Editorial: Women in surgical oncology: 2021

Currently, female researchers represent merely a minority, accounting for an estimated 29.3% who end up covering this position worldwide, with a great variability according to each country (1). Specifically, Central Asia exhibits the greatest proportion of female researchers with an estimated 48.2% as opposed to South and West Asia with the lowest count globally (i.e. 18.5%) (1). In response to such a large gender gap in the scientific research community, the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) is in the midst of developing new indicators in order to better comprehend the reasons behind women’s decisions to pursue one career over another. Several could be the reasons implicated in limiting and discouraging women’s access to the scientific community, including ancient biases and gender stereotypes. By further understanding such issues, the UIS project concurrently aims at reducing the gender inequality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields, by possibly promoting reforms in policies and implementing changes in favor of gender equality in all countries with the ultimate goal of empowering women (2

Response to Sleeve gastrectomy may double the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in morbidly obese patients

We would like to thank Papadia et al. for their interest in our article, “Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Actual or Potential Threat? Italian Series and Literature Review” [1]. We also greatly appreciated their attempt at evaluating the relative risk (RR) of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients who undergo sleeve gastrectomy (SG). To do so, they extrapolated the reported number of SGs performed in Italy over the 3-year period (2012–2015) in which the EAC cases belonging to our series occurred. Papadia et al. [1] show how SG may raise the risk of developing EAC by an estimated 11-fold compared with the general population. Furthermore, they highlight how the RR of EAC in the SG subpopulation appears to be substantially greater compared with patients affected by morbid obesity (RR of 11.9 versus 4.8, respectively). The authors also share our concern regarding the young age (40.3 ± 16.7 yr) and early presentation (27.3 ± 7.6 mo) of EAC after surgery, pointing out how the progression from a normal esophageal mucosa to Barrett’s esophagus (BE) generally befalls over a considerably longer timeframe in patients with GERD that did not have SG. This observation is supported by several studies published by our group demonstrating how the incidence of BE, 58 months after SG, is as high as 17.2%—consistent with other reported rates (i.e., 15%–18.8%) [2,3]—and is correlated to the increased presence of a biliary-type refluxate [[4], [5], [6]], likely to be responsible for the accelerated mucosal injury of the distal esophagus [7]. Emblematic is the case reported in literature of the patient who had a preoperatively diagnosed short-segment BE and who inevitably developed an EAC 36 months later [8]. Although a sporadically reported case, this further emphasizes not only the importance of performing a preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to detect any mucosal lesion, but also how BE should constitute an absolute contraindication to SG due to its innate risk of malignant evolution. Finally, loss to follow-up still represents a major, long-standing issue after bariatric surgery, which contributes to precluding the chance of performing protocols of secondary prevention for the identification of any esophageal malignancy at its earliest stages. To this regard, close endoscopic surveillance is of paramount importance for a prompt detection. We also would like to reiterate the necessity of having international online registries, which could allow physicians to determine the actual incidence of EAC after SG and to comprehend its pathogenesis, management, and outcomes possibly better. Despite this potential downside, SG persists as a safe and effective procedure for the cure of obesity and its co-morbid conditions, concurrently carrying low rates of long-term complications and nutritional deficiencies. Additionally, due to its greater technical simplicity and shorter operative time compared with other common bariatric procedures, SG is also the treatment of choice in the super-obese group, easily granting the option for revisional surgery (i.e., RYGB, one anastomosis gastric bypass [OAGB], duodenal switch [DS], single anastomosis duodeno-ileal sleeve [SADI-S]) in case of weight regain or insufficient weight loss. Hence, SG should yet be regarded as a fundamental and valuable bariatric operation to be performed after a thorough preoperative workup and a close endoscopic follow up

Obesity surgery and cancer. What are the unanswered questions?

Obesity has become a global epidemic with a soaring economic encumbrance due to its related morbidity and mortality. Amongst obesity-related conditions, cancer is indeed the most redoubtable. Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity and its associatedmetabolic and cardiovascular disorders. However, the understanding of whether and how bariatric surgery determines a reduction in cancer risk is limited. Obesity-related malignancies primarily include colorectal and hormone-sensitive (endometrium, breast, prostate) cancers. Additionally, esophago-gastric tumors are growing to be recognized as a new category mainly associated with post-bariatric surgery outcomes. In fact, certain types of surgical procedures have been described to induce the development and subsequent progression of pre-cancerous esophageal and gastric lesions. This emerging category is of great concern and further research is required to possibly prevent such risks. Published data has generated conflicting results. In fact, while overall cancer risk reduction was reported particularly in women, some authors showed no improvement or even increased cancer incidence. Although various studies have reported beneficial effects of surgery on risk of specific cancer development, fundamental insights into the pathogenesis of obesity-related cancer are indispensable to fully elucidate its mechanisms

Esophageal adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy. Actual or potential threat? Italian series and literature review

Background:Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) leads to esophageal mucosal damage in an elevated percent-age of cases, configuring a clinical condition of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in a proportion as high as15–18.8%. BE may rarely evolve into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).Objectives:To raise awareness of BE as a precancerous lesion which may progress toward malig-nancy after this popular bariatric procedure.Setting:Bariatric referral centers, Italy.Methods:All patients referred to our bariatric center who developed an EAC after SG between 2012and 2019 were reviewed and consecutively included in this study. The available scientific literatureregarding this complication is additionally reviewed.Results:The 3 male patients comprised in this case series underwent laparoscopic SG between 2012and 2015 in different bariatric referral centers. Age and body mass index at baseline ranged from 21–54 years and 43.1–75.6 kg/m2, respectively. All patients were lost to follow-up early after surgery (3.761.4 months), and were diagnosed with EAC at a mean of 27.367.6 months after SG. The 4 re-ported cases in the scientific literature developed an EAC at a mean of 32.5623 months fromSG. Overall, a diagnosis of EAC was made approximately 30.3617.1 months postoperatively, whichseems relatively and worryingly early after surgery. Conclusion:Although the rate and probability of progression from BE to EAC is still not well defined,assuming that the rising popularity and execution of SG leads to a growth in the BE incidence, then thepreoperative identification and stratification of cancer risk factors in this subset of patients is stronglyencouraged. Clinical and endoscopic follow-ups are essential to allow for prevention and early diag-nosis and for epidemiologic data collection purposes

Spider surgical system versus multiport laparoscopic surgery. Performance comparison on a surgical simulator

BACKGROUND: The rising interest towards minimally invasive surgery has led to the introduction of laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) surgery as the natural evolution of conventional multiport laparoscopy. However, this new surgical approach is hampered with peculiar technical difficulties. The SPIDER surgical system has been developed in the attempt to overcome some of these challenges. Our study aimed to compare standard laparoscopy and SPIDER technical performance on a surgical simulator, using standardized tasks from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). METHODS: Twenty participants were divided into two groups based on their surgical laparoscopic experience: 10 PGY1 residents were included in the inexperienced group and 10 laparoscopists in the experienced group. Participants performed the FLS pegboard transfers task and pattern cutting task on a laparoscopic box trainer. Objective task scores and subjective questionnaire rating scales were used to compare conventional laparoscopy and SPIDER surgical system. RESULTS: Both groups performed significantly better in the FLS scores on the standard laparoscopic simulator compared to the SPIDER. Inexperienced group: Task 1 scores (median 252.5 vs. 228.5; p = 0.007); Task 2 scores (median 270.5 vs. 219.0; p = 0.005). Experienced group: Task 1 scores (median 411.5 vs. 309.5; p = 0.005); Task 2 scores (median 418.0 vs. 331.5; p = 0.007). Same aspects were highlighted for the subjective evaluations, except for the inexperienced surgeons who found both devices equivalent in terms of ease of use only in the peg transfer task. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the SPIDER is an innovative and promising device, our study proved that it is more challenging than conventional laparoscopy in a population with different degrees of surgical experience. We presume that a possible way to overcome such challenges could be the development of tailored training programs through simulation methods. This may represent an effective way to deliver training, achieve mastery and skills and prepare surgeons for their future clinical experience

Upper gut heat shock proteins HSP70 and GRP78 promote insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

A high-fat diet increases the risk of insulin resistance, type-2 diabetes, and non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis. Here we identified two heat-shock proteins, Heat-Shock-Protein70 and Glucose-Regulated Protein78, which are increased in the jejunum of rats on a high-fat diet. We demonstrated a causal link between these proteins and hepatic and whole-body insulin-resistance, as well as the metabolic response to bariatric/metabolic surgery. Long-term continuous infusion of Heat-Shock-Protein70 and Glucose-Regulated Protein78 caused insulin-resistance, hyperglycemia, and non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis in rats on a chow diet, while in rats on a high-fat diet continuous infusion of monoclonal antibodies reversed these phenotypes, mimicking metabolic surgery. Infusion of these proteins or their antibodies was also associated with shifts in fecal microbiota composition. Serum levels of Heat-Shock-Protein70 and Glucose-Regulated Protein78were elevated in patients with non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis, but decreased following metabolic surgery. Understanding the intestinal regulation of metabolism may provide options to reverse metabolic diseases

Insulin sensitivity and secretion modifications after bariatric surgery

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing over time as result of the obesity epidemics. In fact, the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes across Europe in 2010 was estimated to be 8.2% of the population and its projection for 2030 sees figures of 10.1%. This increase in the number of diabetic individuals has also dramatically raised the health expense, with spending on diabetes in Europe in 2010 accounting for 10% of the total healthcare cost. A meta-analysis of the literature evidenced that the clinical and laboratory manifestations of Type 2 diabetes are resolved in 78.1%, and are improved in 86.6% of obese patients (body mass index >35 kg/m²) after bariatric surgery. However, a gradation of effects of different surgical techniques in improving glucose control does exist, with the largest and durable effects observed in prevalently malabsorptive procedures. The outcome of bariatric surgery on insulin sensitivity and secretion is different in relation to the type of operation performed. In fact, while Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass enhances insulin secretion after a meal thus improving glucose metabolism, Bilio-Pancreatic Diversion acts through the amelioration of insulin sensitivity allowing a subsequent reduction of insulin hypersecretion, which is a typical feature of the insulin resistance state. Gastric banding action is mediated uniquely through the weight loss, and the effect of sleeve gastrectomy is still to be elucidated. Incretin secretion is dramatically increased under nutrient stimulation after gastric bypass leading, probably, to an overstimulation of pancreatic β-cells resulting in the increase of insulin secretio