5 research outputs found

    Genotoxicity of tamoxifen citrate and 4‐nitroquinoline‐1‐oxide in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster

    Get PDF
    Tamoxifen (TAM) is an anti‐oestrogen used for treatment and prevention of human breast cancer, but it is also related to human endometrial and uterine cancer. The wing spot test in Drosophila melanogaster was employed to determine the genotoxic effects of TAM and 4‐nitroquinoline‐1‐oxide (4‐NQO), a carcinogen that produces adducts similar to TAM-DNA adducts detected in rodent liver and human liver microsomes. As Drosophila spp. have no oestrogen receptor, no effects can result in binding of TAM to a receptor. Chronic treatments with TAM citrate were performed with 3‐day‐old larvae of the standard (ST) and high bioactivation (HB) crosses of the wing spot test at concentrations of 0.66, 1.66 and 3.33 mM. In addition, the carcinogen 4‐NQO was administered at 2.5 and 5.0 mM. Somatic spots on normal wings from marker‐ heterozygous flies and on serrate wings from balancer‐ heterozygous flies were scored to determine mutation and recombination events in somatic cells for each compound. The results showed genotoxic effects of TAM at 1.66 and 3.33 mM in the ST cross only and without a clear dose-response effect. This suggests a weak genotoxicity of this anti‐oestrogen. The negative results obtained with TAM in the HB cross may indicate efficient detoxification of the compound by the increased xenobiotic metabolism present in this cross. As reported before, 4‐NQO showed genotoxic effects in the ST cross with a clear dose-response effect. For the first time, we report enhanced effects of this compound in the HB cross. It is concluded that the genotoxicity of TAM in the Drosophila wing spot test is different from that of 4‐NQ

    Effects of Fructose and Palmitic Acid on Gene Expression in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> Larvae: Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases

    No full text
    One of the largest health problems worldwide is the development of chronic noncommunicable diseases due to the consumption of hypercaloric diets. Among the most common alterations are cardiovascular diseases, and a high correlation between overnutrition and neurodegenerative diseases has also been found. The urgency in the study of specific damage to tissues such as the brain and intestine led us to use Drosophila melanogaster to study the metabolic effects caused by the consumption of fructose and palmitic acid in specific tissues. Thus, third instar larvae (96 ± 4 h) of the wild Canton-S strain of D. melanogaster were used to perform transcriptomic profiling in brain and midgut tissues to test for the potential metabolic effects of a diet supplemented with fructose and palmitic acid. Our data infer that this diet can alter the biosynthesis of proteins at the mRNA level that participate in the synthesis of amino acids, as well as fundamental enzymes for the dopaminergic and GABAergic systems in the midgut and brain. These also demonstrated alterations in the tissues of flies that may help explain the development of various reported human diseases associated with the consumption of fructose and palmitic acid in humans. These studies will not only help to better understand the mechanisms by which the consumption of these alimentary products is related to the development of neuronal diseases but may also contribute to the prevention of these conditions

    Zearalenone Does Not Show Genotoxic Effects in the <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> Wing Spot Test, but It Induces Oxidative Imbalance, Development, and Fecundity Alterations

    No full text
    Zearalenone (ZEN) is a non-steroidal mycoestrogen produced by the Fusarium genus. ZEN and its metabolites compete with 17-beta estradiol for cytosolic estrogen receptors, causing reproductive alterations in vertebrates. ZEN has also been associated with toxic and genotoxic effects, as well as an increased risk for endometrial adenocarcinomas or hyperplasia, breast cancer, and oxidative damage, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Previous studies have monitored cellular processes through levels of transcripts associated with Phase I Xenobiotic Metabolism (Cyp6g1 and Cyp6a2), oxidative stress (hsp60 and hsp70), apoptosis (hid, grim, and reaper), and DNA damage genes (Dmp53). In this study, we evaluated the survival and genotoxicity of ZEN, as well as its effects on emergence rate and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Additionally, we determined levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) using the D. melanogaster flare and Oregon R(R)-flare strains, which differ in levels of Cyp450 gene expression. Our results showed that ZEN toxicity did not increase mortality by more than 30%. We tested three ZEN concentrations (100, 200, and 400 μM) and found that none of the concentrations were genotoxic but were cytotoxic. Taking into account that it has previously been demonstrated that ZEN administration increased hsp60 expression levels and apoptosis gene transcripts in both strains, the data agree with an increase in ROS and development and fecundity alterations. Since Drosophila lacks homologous genes for mammalian estrogen receptors alpha and beta, the effects of this mycotoxin can be explained by a mechanism different from estrogenic activity

    Global attitudes in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: ACIE Appy Study

    No full text
    Background: Surgical strategies are being adapted to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations on the management of acute appendicitis have been based on expert opinion, but very little evidence is available. This study addressed that dearth with a snapshot of worldwide approaches to appendicitis. Methods: The Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe designed an online survey to assess the current attitude of surgeons globally regarding the management of patients with acute appendicitis during the pandemic. Questions were divided into baseline information, hospital organization and screening, personal protective equipment, management and surgical approach, and patient presentation before versus during the pandemic. Results: Of 744 answers, 709 (from 66 countries) were complete and were included in the analysis. Most hospitals were treating both patients with and those without COVID. There was variation in screening indications and modality used, with chest X-ray plus molecular testing (PCR) being the commonest (19\ub78 per cent). Conservative management of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis was used by 6\ub76 and 2\ub74 per cent respectively before, but 23\ub77 and 5\ub73 per cent, during the pandemic (both P < 0\ub7001). One-third changed their approach from laparoscopic to open surgery owing to the popular (but evidence-lacking) advice from expert groups during the initial phase of the pandemic. No agreement on how to filter surgical smoke plume during laparoscopy was identified. There was an overall reduction in the number of patients admitted with appendicitis and one-third felt that patients who did present had more severe appendicitis than they usually observe. Conclusion: Conservative management of mild appendicitis has been possible during the pandemic. The fact that some surgeons switched to open appendicectomy may reflect the poor guidelines that emanated in the early phase of SARS-CoV-2
    corecore