21 research outputs found

    Les clivages sociaux en Europe autour de la construction politique europĂ©enne en 2005-2010: l’Europe des Ă©lites contre l’État-Nation des classes populaires?

    Get PDF
    The rejection of the European Constitution by French and Dutch voters in 2005 has brought about an unprecedented crisis for European integration, with strong risks of regression into nationalism and xenophobia. However, in a paradoxical way, that crisis has not prevented the building of a political Europe - even a federal Europe - because it has hampered intergovernmental negotiations more than the functioning of European institutions. Moreover, social polarisation means that Europhiles in the Ă©lites have been able to press for institutional solutions culminating in the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, a landmark in the consolidation of the European Union

    Les pĂ©riphĂ©ries espagnoles aprĂšs 1978: Catalyseurs de l’intĂ©gration europĂ©enne?

    Get PDF
    Since 1978 and the return to democracy, Spain’s three main peripheral spaces from a linguistic, cultural point of view (Catalonia, the Basque Country and Galicia) have been constantly trying to get more and more autonomy from the central Spanish state. As regiones históricas (“historical regions”), they claim more competences than those enjoyed by other comunidades autónomas. That is particularly spectacular in the case of the Basque Country and Catalonia. From that perspective, belonging to the European Union was long perceived as an essential element in order to act without the Spanish state’s permission in the field of public policies. Therefore it was seen as a clearly beneficial political commitment. At a time when identities often clash in new ways, it is necessary to wonder whether those Spanish peripheral spaces go on playing such a role of catalysts of European integration

    Le discours identitaire d’extrĂȘme droite: rĂ©vĂ©lateur d’une idĂ©ologie aux marges du paysage politique?

    Get PDF
    In his book Histoire de l’extrĂȘme droite en France (A history of the extreme right in France), the French historian Michel Winock shows how difficult it is to give a simple, accurate definition of the extreme right, which he presents as ‘a hard political tendency but a soft concept’. However, one of the characteristics which are common to most extreme right-wing parties is that they tend to inscribe their discourse on identity (not only from a political point of view but also from a cultural or even biological point of view) inside a marginal space and even a space of marginality, a domain for marginal personalities.We shall see that those organisations choose to place themselves deliberately into the margins of the political landscape and that they do it in both senses of the term: first because their discourses sound scandalous to democratic parties and secondly because those speeches often reflect their will to exclude themselves from the political game. Indeed, extreme right-wing theorists and politicians frequently refuse to exercise power because they consider that such an activity is almost inevitably tainted with compromise and corruption. So they prefer resorting to verbal – or even physical – violence in order to attract voters eager to protest against the supposed unfairness of the establishment. That is why extreme right-wing factions have to face a difficult situation in which they need to be marginal and scandalous to exist, but in which democratic, governmental parties can easily use their marginal character to turn them into political scarecrows and ensure their own dominance in an even surer way

    Les dĂ©rapages europhobes dans le dĂ©bat britannique sur la construction d’une Europe politique

    No full text
    How Europhobia gets out of hand in the British debate regarding the construction of a political Europe. British Europhobic ideology is different from simple Euroscepticism, through very clear-cut political and geostrategic positions, and by approximations and shortcuts which sometimes get out of hand. Europhobia is thus a complexe phenomenon in the United Kingdom, and its political exploitation is difficult, whether one is Eurosceptic or a Europhile. The rise of often anti-European populism on the continent relativises the importance of the British Europhobes, but for Tony Blair it is perhaps the indifference of the electorat which threatens his European leadership.L’idĂ©ologie europhobe britannique se distingue du simple euroscepticisme par des positions trĂšs tranchĂ©es en matiĂšre politique et gĂ©ostratĂ©gique, et par des approximations et des raccourcis qui confinent parfois au dĂ©rapage. L’europhobie constitue ainsi un phĂ©nomĂšne complexe au Royaume-Uni et, Ă  ce titre, elle est malaisĂ©e Ă  exploiter politiquement, que l’on se place du point de vue eurosceptique, ou du point de vue europhile. La montĂ©e des populismes souvent anti-europĂ©ens sur le continent relativise l’importance des europhobes britanniques mais, pour Tony Blair, c’est peut-ĂȘtre l’indiffĂ©rence de l’électorat qui menace ses projets de leadership europĂ©en et son image de Premier ministre le plus europĂ©en depuis Edward Heath.Cassagnau Olivier. Les dĂ©rapages europhobes dans le dĂ©bat britannique sur la construction d’une Europe politique. In: Cahiers Charles V, n°41,2006. La Grande-Bretagne et l'Europe. Ambivalence et pragmatisme. pp. 105-120
    corecore