15 research outputs found

    Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular geometric patterns in patients with essential hypertension

    Get PDF
    Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to affect left ventricular (LV) remodeling favorably in several conditions, it remains unclear whether they can influence LV geometric pattern in hypertension. To address this issue, 122 patients (71 men and 51 women; mean age = 51 +/- 20 years) with mild to moderate hypertension were studied prospectively. All underwent clinical evaluation and Doppler echocardiography at entry and more than 2 years of quinapril therapy (10-40 mg/day). According to either LV mass (normal if <131 g/m(2) for men or <100 g/m(2) for women) or the ratio of LV posterior wall thickness to diastolic diameter (RWT; normal if <0.45) at baseline, 58 patients had normal mass and RWT, 18 patients had concentric remodeling (i.e., normal mass but increased RWT), 24 patients had eccentric hypertrophy (i.e., increased mass but normal RWT), and 22 patients had concentric hypertrophy (i.e., increase in both mass and RWT). After 6 months of quinapril therapy, all patients with normal left ventricles showed the maintenance of mass and RWT within normal limits. Patients with concentric remodeling showed no increase in mass but had a significant decrease in RWT. Patients with eccentric hypertrophy exhibited a significant reduction in mass with no substantial change in RWT. Patients with concentric hypertrophy had a significant reduction in both mass and RWT. Changes in LV mass and geometry were maintained during the 2-year period of treatment and were paralleled by improvements in Doppler in dices of LV diastolic function in each group. It is concluded that quinapril, with its well-known effects on LV hypertrophy, modifies the LV geometric pattern of hypertensive patients favorably, regardless of the presence of an abnormal LV mass or RWT

    Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Utility of a Digital Health Tool for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring in Real-Life Hematology Practice. Evidence From the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE Platform

    Get PDF
    Digital health tools are increasingly being used in cancer care and may include electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring systems. We examined physicians’ perceptions of usability and clinical utility of a digital health tool (GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform) for ePRO monitoring in the real-life practice of patients with hematologic malignancies. This tool allows for the collection and assessment of ePROs with real-time graphical presentation of results to medical staff. Based on a predefined algorithm, automated alerts are sent to medical staff. Participating hematologists completed an online survey on their experience with the platform. Of the 201 patients invited to participate between December 2020 and June 2021 (cut-off date for current analysis), 180 (90%) agreed to enter the platform and had a median age of 57 years. Twenty-three hematologists with a median age of 42 years and an average of 17 years of experience in clinical practice were surveyed. All hematologists agreed or strongly agreed that the platform was easy to use, and 87%, agreed or strongly agreed that ePROs data were useful to enhance communication with their patients. The majority of physicians (78%) accessed the platform at least once per month to consult the symptom and health status profile of their patients. The frequency of access was independent of physician sex (p=0.393) and years of experience in clinical practice (p=0.404). In conclusion, our preliminary results support the clinical utility, from the perspective of the treating hematologist, of integrating ePROs into the routine cancer care of patients with hematologic malignancies

    Critical pathways in the emergency department improve treatment modalities for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a European hospital

    No full text
    The use of protocols for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is growing, but no definite conclusion regarding the value of critical pathways in Europe has been drawn
    corecore