Additional file 2: of Feasibility of training practice nurses to deliver a psychosocial intervention within a collaborative care framework for people with depression and long-term conditions

Summary of change in depression symptom level and service use. Tabulated data of average PHQ-9 scores per practice (baseline and post-treatment) and average number of contacts and related costs per practice and patient. (PDF 63 kb

Additional file 1: of A feasibility study for NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression: The NOTEPAD study Protocol

SPIRIT 2013 Checklist. Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents. (DOC 122 kb

Trial CONSORT Diagram.

<p>Trial CONSORT Diagram.</p

Health related quality of life for intervention and control patients.

<p>Health related quality of life for intervention and control patients.</p

Baseline characteristics of participants.

<p>Values are number (percentage) unless stated otherwise.</p><p>Baseline characteristics of participants.</p

Intervention uptake and evaluation.

<p>Values are number (percentage).</p><p>Intervention uptake and evaluation.</p

Cost Effectiveness Analyses.

<p>*Adjusting for baseline measures, and pre-specified covariates for age (individual level), and (at the cluster level) deprivation (IMD), site, and practice size.</p><p>**Dominance: lower expected costs, with greater expected QALY gain.</p>‡<p>WTP = willingness to pay; based in the assessment of incremental net benefit statistic, and WTP thresholds commonly applied in the UK NHS (NICE, 2013).</p

Unit costs for different types of health and social care resource items.

<p>*Unit costs at 2011 prices/costs.</p><p>**Costs uprated/adjusted to 2011 prices using HCHS index reported in PSSRU Unit Costs of Health Care <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0104225#pone.0104225-Curtis1" target="_blank">[27]</a>.</p><p>PSSRU Unit Costs of Health Care 2011 <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0104225#pone.0104225-Curtis1" target="_blank">[27]</a>.</p><p>NHS Ref Costs 2008–09 - <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_256900.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_256900.pdf</a> (Accessed 18/05/12).</p

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

<p>Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.</p

Estimated mean cost (£’s) for health, social care, and other resource use, over 12 month follow-up.

<p><b><i>Kruskal-Wallis (non-parametric) test: no statistically significant differences between groups, other than for OTC cost, and cost for days lost work by friends/relatives, which are statistically significant at p≤0.05.</i></b></p><p><b><i>(Appt</i></b> = <b><i>appointment; OTC</i></b> = <b><i>over the counter).</i></b></p