Neurophysiological mechanisms of chronic primary spine pain relief by chiropractic spinal manipulation = Mécanismes neurophysiologiques du soulagement de la douleur vertébrale chronique primaire par les manipulations vertébrales chiropratiques

La chiropratique est une profession de la santé qui s’intéresse au diagnostic, au traitement, et à la prévention des troubles musculosquelettiques. L’intervention la plus communément utilisée en chiropratique est la manipulation vertébrale (dite « ajustement chiropratique »). D’ailleurs, les consultations en chiropratique sont principalement pour des douleurs vertébrales, particulièrement dans la région lombaire. La lombalgie est la principale cause d'incapacité à travers le monde. Elle engendre des coûts considérables pour la société et les individus atteints. Chez environ un tiers des individus, la lombalgie persiste et devient chronique, entraînant une incapacité et une diminution de la qualité de vie. Chez ces individus, aucun processus pathologique affectant les tissus vertébraux ne peut être mis en évidence. En effet, cette douleur, dite nociplastique, serait plutôt causée par des mécanismes pathologiques du système nociceptif. La lombalgie chronique, dite primaire chez ces individus, est ainsi considérée comme le diagnostic en soi, et non un symptôme secondaire à une pathologie sous-jacente. Chez certains individus, les manipulations vertébrales peuvent soulager la lombalgie chronique primaire. Cependant, leur efficacité comme intervention de première ligne et leurs mécanismes hypoalgésiques restent à démontrer. L'objectif général de cette thèse est d’examiner les mécanismes hypoalgésiques des manipulations vertébrales. Le premier objectif spécifique est d’examiner les mécanismes hypoalgésiques d’une manipulation vertébrale à l’aide d’un modèle expérimental de douleur persistante chez des individus en santé. Le deuxième objectif spécifique est d’examiner les mécanismes du soulagement de la douleur lombaire chronique primaire par une intervention chiropratique de quatre semaines, qui comprend douze séances de manipulations vertébrales. La thèse comprend deux études empiriques, soit une étude expérimentale et une étude clinique, qui sont précédées d’une revue de littérature ciblée. Le premier article est une revue narrative explorant les mécanismes neurophysiologiques de la manipulation vertébrale pour soulager la douleur vertébrale. Le deuxième article décrit les résultats d’une étude expérimentale chez des individus en santé. Dans cette étude, nous avons examiné les mécanismes d'inhibition de la douleur en réponse à une manipulation vertébrale ciblant un segment vertébral dont la peau a été sensibilisée par une application topique de capsaïcine. Le troisième article est une revue narrative examinant l'efficacité des manipulations vertébrales pour le traitement des douleurs vertébrales. Le quatrième article décrit les résultats d’un essai contrôlé randomisé avec groupe placebo chez des individus atteints de lombalgie chronique primaire. Dans cette étude, nous avons examiné si le soulagement de la lombalgie chronique primaire par une intervention chiropratique s’accompagne d’une atténuation de processus pathologiques contribuant à la douleur nociplastique. Les résultats indiquent qu’une manipulation vertébrale peut atténuer l’hyperalgésie mécanique secondaire observée avec le modèle expérimental de douleur persistante. Ceci suggère qu’une manipulation vertébrale pourrait agir sur des processus pathologiques qui mènent à la douleur chronique. Ces résultats sont cohérents avec la réduction de la douleur observée chez les patients atteints de lombalgie chronique primaire recevant des manipulations vertébrales. De plus, la réduction de la lombalgie chronique était accompagnée d’une réduction de l’hyperalgésie mécanique lombaire et de la dramatisation de la douleur. Dans l’ensemble, ces résultats suggèrent qu’une intervention chiropratique comprenant des manipulations vertébrales est efficace pour réduire la lombalgie chronique primaire, et que cet effet pourrait découler en partie d’une réduction de processus contribuant à la douleur nociplastique. Ceci renforce les recommandations cliniques sur l’utilisation de la chiropratique pour le soulagement de la lombalgie chronique primaire. D’autres études seront nécessaires pour clarifier les mécanismes neurophysiologiques et anti-inflammatoires des manipulations vertébrales.Chiropractic is a health profession focused on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, mainly through spinal manipulation (also known as "chiropractic adjustment"). The majority of patients consult a chiropractor seeking spine pain relief, primarily in the lower back. Low back pain is the leading cause of global disability, generating considerable costs for society and affected individuals. At least one third of people with low back pain experience persistent pain, leading to chronic disability and a decrease in quality of life. In affected individuals, no pathological process affecting the spinal tissues can be identified. Instead, this pain, called nociplastic, is presumed to be caused by pathological mechanisms within the nociceptive system. Thus, in these individuals, low back pain is considered as chronic primary pain, and not the symptom of an underlying disease. In some individuals, spinal manipulations can relieve chronic primary low back pain. However, their effectiveness as a first-line intervention and their hypoalgesic mechanisms remain to be demonstrated. The overarching aim of this thesis is to examine the hypoalgesic mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulations. The first specific objective is to investigate the hypoalgesic mechanisms of a spinal manipulation using an experimental model of persistent back pain in healthy individuals. The second specific objective is to investigate the mechanisms of relief of chronic primary low back pain by a four-week chiropractic intervention, including twelve sessions of spinal manipulations. The thesis includes two empirical studies: an experimental study and a clinical study, both preceded by a targeted literature review. The first study is a narrative review exploring the neurophysiological mechanisms of spinal manipulation to relieve spine pain. The second article describes the results of an experimental trial on healthy individuals, where we examined the mechanisms of pain inhibition following a spinal manipulation targeting a spinal segment sensitized by the topical application of capsaicin The third article is a narrative review examining the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for the treatment of spine pain. The fourth article describes the results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial with individuals suffering from chronic primary low back pain. In this study, we examined whether the relief of chronic primary low back pain by a chiropractic intervention is accompanied by an attenuation of pathological processes contributing to nociplastic pain. The results indicate that a single spinal manipulation can mitigate segmental mechanical hyperalgesia observed with the experimental model of persistent pain. This suggests that spinal manipulations could act on pathological processes that lead to chronic pain. These results are consistent with the pain reduction observed in patients with chronic primary low back pain receiving spinal manipulations. Furthermore, low back pain relief was accompanied by a reduction in mechanical hyperalgesia and in pain catastrophizing. Overall, these results indicate that a chiropractic intervention including spinal manipulations is efficacious in reducing chronic primary low back pain, and that this effect could in part stem from a reduction in processes contributing to nociplastic pain. This reinforces clinical recommendations on the use of chiropractic for the relief of chronic primary low back pain. Further studies will be needed to clarify the neurophysiological and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of spinal manipulations

Urinary TNF-α as a potential biomarker for chronic primary low back pain

IntroductionOver two thirds of individuals with low back pain (LBP) may experience recurrent or persistent symptoms in the long term. Yet, current data do not allow to predict who will develop chronic low back pain and who will recover from an acute episode. Elevated serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) have been associated with poor recovery and persistent pain following an acute episode of LBP. Inflammatory cytokines may also mediate mechanisms involved in nociplastic pain, and thus, have significant implications in chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP).MethodsThis study aimed to investigate the potential of urinary TNF-α levels for predicting outcomes and characterizing clinical features of CPLBP patients. Twenty-four patients with CPLBP and 24 sex- and age-matched asymptomatic controls were recruited. Urinary TNF-α concentrations were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks, during which CPLBP patients underwent spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).ResultsConcentrations of TNF-α were found to be elevated in baseline urine samples of CPLBP patients compared to asymptomatic controls. Moreover, these values differed among patients depending on their pain trajectory. Patients with persistent pain showed higher levels of TNF-α, when compared to those with episodic CPLBP. Furthermore, baseline TNF-α concentrations and their changes after 4 weeks predicted alterations in pain intensity and disability following SMT in patients with CPLBP.DiscussionThese findings warrant further research on the potential use of urinary TNF-α concentrations as a prognostic biomarker for CPLBP

Neurophysiological mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulation for spine pain

Abstract Together, neck pain and back pain are the first cause of disability worldwide, accounting for more than 10% of the total years lived with disability. In this context, chiropractic care provides a safe and effective option for the management of a large proportion of these patients. Chiropractic is a healthcare profession mainly focused on the spine and the treatment of spinal disorders, including spine pain. Basic studies have examined the influence of chiropractic spinal manipulation on a variety of peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal mechanisms involved in spine pain. While spinal cord mechanisms of pain inhibition contribute at least partly to the pain-relieving effects of chiropractic treatments, the evidence is weaker regarding peripheral and supraspinal mechanisms, which are important components of acute and chronic pain. This narrative review highlights the most relevant mechanisms of pain relief by spinal manipulation and provides a perspective for future research on spinal manipulation and spine pain, including the validation of placebo interventions that control for placebo effects and other non-specific effects that may be induced by spinal manipulation

From hands-on to remote:Moderators of response to a novel self-management telehealth programme during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, state‐wide lockdowns were declared in many countries, including Spain. Citizens were confined to their homes and remotely supported activities were prioritized as an alternative to in‐person interactions. Previous data suggest that remote and self‐management interventions may be successful at reducing pain and related psychological variables. However, individual factors influencing the effectiveness of these interventions remain to be identified. We aimed to investigate the psychological and motivational factors moderating changes in pain observed in chiropractic patients undertaking a novel telehealth self‐management programme. METHODS: A cohort of 208 patients from a chiropractic teaching clinic was recruited to participate in the study. Patients received telehealth consultations and individualized self‐management strategies tailored for their current complaint. They were encouraged to make use of these strategies daily for 2–4 weeks, whilst rating their pain intensity, motivation and adherence. Validated questionnaires were completed online to assess catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients completed the first 2 weeks of the programme, experiencing significant reductions in all variables. Kinesiophobia emerged as a key factor influencing pain reduction and moderating the association between motivation and pain relief. In turn, adherence to the programme was associated with lower pain intensity, although moderated by the degree of motivation. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of COVID‐19, when introducing remote and self‐management strategies, pain cognitions and motivational factors should be taken into consideration to foster adherence and yield better pain outcomes