Abnormal regulation of soluble and anchored IL-6 receptor in monocytes from patients with essential thrombocythemia

Objective: In a previous study, we found increased plasma soluble receptor for interleukin-6 (sIL-6R) levels in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) that could promote megakaryopoiesis through IL-6 binding and further interaction with the signal transducer gp130. Here we have searched for the cell source of sIL-6R within mononuclear cells in these patients and the underlying abnormalities involved in its overproduction. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with the diagnosis of ET were studied. sIL-6R levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique in the supernatants of peripheral monocyte and lymphocyte cultures. Expression of membrane-anchored IL-6R was determined by flow cytometry. In order to study the mechanism of sIL-6R production, tumor necrosis factor−α protease inhibitor was added to specifically block IL-6R shedding. Gene expression of sIL-6R levels were evaluated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results: Monocytes were the main source of sIL-6R. Besides, in ET patients, monocyte sIL-6R release was higher than that of controls (p = 0.0014). Lymphocytes enhanced monocyte sIL-6R production by cell-mediated contact in normal controls, but this cooperation could not be seen in patients. Membrane expression of IL-6R was increased after monocyte adhesion in ET. sIL-6R synthesis was upregulated in most patients, while messenger RNA was normal. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ET monocytes are responsible for sIL-6R overproduction within mononuclear cells through synthesis upregulation. In addition, the lack of cooperation of lymphocytes in monocyte sIL-6R production in ET could be due to a monocyte abnormality. The agonistic effect of sIL-6R on IL-6 action could contribute to the exacerbated megakaryocytic growth in ET.Fil: Goette, Nora Paula. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Lev, Paola Roxana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Heller, Paula Graciela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Glembotsky, Ana Claudia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Chazarreta, Carlos Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Salim, Juan Pablo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Molinas, Felisa Concepcion. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; ArgentinaFil: Marta, Rosana Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas; Argentin

Five-Test Simple Scheme for Species-Level Identification of Clinically Significant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

A working scheme developed in our laboratory for identification (by species group and species) of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) was evaluated with 201 consecutive isolates and then validated by using the reference method of Kloos and Schleifer (W. E. Kloos and K. H. Schleifer, J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:82-88, 1975). This five-test simple scheme (referred to here as the simple scheme) combines the novobiocin susceptibility test with tests for urease, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase, ornithine decarboxylase, and aerobic acid from mannose. The addition of one or two tests within a particular species group could then positively identify the isolate. Two commercial systems, Staph-Zym (Rosco) and API-Staph (bioMérieux), along with results obtained by using Rosco diagnostic tablets (nongrowth tests), were also compared with the reference method. One isolate could not be identified even by the reference method. Of the remaining 200 strains, 191 (95.5%) strains were correctly identified with Staph-Zym and 171 strains (85.5%) were correctly identified with API-Staph. The most frequent clinical CNS species isolated were Staphylococcus epidermidis (50.5%), S. haemolyticus (18.5%), S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (16.0%), S. lugdunensis (6.0%), and S. warneri (2.5%). The simple scheme validated with the reference method has demonstrated an excellent correlation in the identification of the three most frequent species isolated: S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus. With the simple scheme, identification of CNS was possible within 24 h after the enzymatic tests were used, whereas up to 72 h is necessary for the growth tests. This methodology would be very useful in any clinical microbiology laboratory for the presumptive identification of CNS species groups and species