KESTREL and KITE Phase 3 studies: 100-week results with brolucizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE To report the 100-week outcomes from KESTREL and KITE. DESIGN Two phase 3, double-masked, active-controlled, randomized trials. METHODS Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg (BRO3/BRO6) or aflibercept 2 mg (AFL) in KESTREL (N=566) or 1:1 to BRO6 or AFL in KITE (N=360). BRO3/BRO6 arms received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by q12w dosing, with an option to adjust to q8w at predefined disease activity assessment visits. In KITE, at Week 72, based on the disease stability assessment, treatment intervals could be extended by 4 weeks in the BRO6 arm. AFL arms received 5 monthly loading doses followed by fixed q8w dosing. RESULTS At Week 100, change from baseline in BCVA (letters) was +8.8 for BRO6 and +10.6 for AFL in KESTREL; +10.9 for BRO6 and +8.4 for AFL in KITE. In both studies, fewer BRO6 subjects had intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid versus (vs) AFL. Results were achieved with 32.9% (KESTREL) and 47.5% (KITE) of BRO6 subjects maintained on q12w and q12w/q16w dosing, respectively. Intraocular inflammation rates for BRO6 vs AFL were 4.2% vs 1.1% (KESTREL) and 2.2% vs 1.7% (KITE) of which retinal vasculitis rates were 0.5% vs 0% in KESTREL, with no cases in KITE. Retinal vascular occlusion rates were 1.6% vs 0.5% (KESTREL) and 0.6% in both treatment arms in KITE. CONCLUSION Results show the long-term efficacy and durability of brolucizumab in improving visual and anatomical outcomes in DME; the overall safety profile of brolucizumab remained unchanged through Year 2

Safety and Efficacy of Ixoberogene Soroparvovec in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States (OPTIC): A Prospective, Two-Year, Multicentre Phase 1 Study

Background Gene therapy, successfully used in rare, monogenetic disorders, may prove to be a durable management approach for common, polygenetic conditions, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Repeated injections, oftentimes monthly, and possibly for decades, of vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists (anti-VEGF), is the standard for nAMD. We hypothesised that an in-office, intravitreal administration of ixoberogene soroparvovec (ixo-vec, formerly ADVM-022), a single-dose gene therapy encoding for the proven anti-VEGF protein, aflibercept, would transform retinal cells to continually produce aflibercept to minimise treatment burden in nAMD. Methods In this two-year, open-label, prospective, multicentre phase 1 study, patients with nAMD responding to antiVEGF were assigned to four cohorts differing by ixo-vec dose (2 × 1011 vs 6 × 1011 vector genomes (vg/eye)) and prophylactic steroids (oral prednisone vs topical difluprednate). The primary outcome was the type, severity, and incidence of ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs); secondary endpoints included vision, central subfield thickness (CST), and the number of supplemental injections. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03748784. Findings Thirty patients with nAMD were enrolled between November 14, 2018 and June 30, 2020 at nine study sites in the United States. No systemic ixo-vec related AEs were noted. Across both dose groups the most common adverse event was anterior chamber cell, which was reported in 11 participants in the 6 × 1011 dose group and in 7 participants in the 2 × 1011 dose group; intraocular inflammation was responsive to topical corticosteroids, with no anterior chamber cells or vitreous cells observed in 2 × 1011 vg/eye patients at the end of the study. Vision and CST remained stable throughout two years with annualised anti-VEGF injections reduced by 80% (10.0 mean annualised anti-VEGF injections to 1.9) in 2 × 1011 vg/eye and 98% (9.8 mean annualised anti-VEGF injections to 0.2) in 6 × 1011 vg/eye cohorts. Interpretation Ixo-vec was generally well-tolerated, maintained vision, and improved anatomical outcomes in nAMD, with a substantial reduction in anti-VEGF injections. A single administration of an in-office gene therapy, with vectorised protein with an already established clinical benefit, has the potential to revolutionise the management of common ocular disorders requiring ongoing, frequent therapeutic interventions

Structural Updates to the Implant and Refill Needle of the Port Delivery Platform

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the impact of component-level changes and manufacturing process improvements on septum durability in the ocular implant of the Port Delivery Platform (PD-P), more commonly known as the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) with its current formulation. METHODS: Laboratory tests were conducted to determine (1) the bond strength of the septum to the overmold, (2) the amount of force utilized for the refill needle to puncture the septum, and (3) septum durability over 50 years. To simulate multiple refill-exchanges over long-term clinical use, implants were aged at elevated temperature in saline and the septum was repetitively punctured at random locations using the refill needle every 3.5 days, simulating 6 months of use. RESULTS: Updates to the septum-overmold interface of the implant and manufacturing process improvements doubled the bond strength between the overmold and septum (1.2 N to 2.4 N). Light lubrication of the refill needle reduced needle insertion force into the septum by \u3e50% (1 N to 0.4 N). Together, these modifications increased long-term septum durability, with no septum dislodgements being observed after over 50 years of simulated use. CONCLUSIONS: Structural updates to the PD-P implant and refill needle have met and exceeded performance specifications, mitigating the risk of future septum dislodgement in the updated product. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Structural updates to the PD-P implant and refill needle resulted in the ability to withstand the equivalent of over 50 years of simulated use without septum dislodgement and should improve the longevity of the device in clinical use

Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures

Purpose: There are primarily two techniques for affixing the scleral buckle (SB) to the sclera in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD): scleral tunnels or scleral sutures. Methods: This retrospective study examined all patients with primary RRD who were treated with primary SB or SB combined with vitrectomy from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 across six sites. Two cohorts were examined: SB affixed using scleral sutures versus scleral tunnels. Pre- and postoperative variables were evaluated including visual acuity, anatomic success, and postoperative strabismus. Results: The mean preoperative logMAR VA for the belt loop cohort was 1.05 ± 1.06 (Snellen 20/224) and for the scleral suture cohort was 1.03 ± 1.04 (Snellen 20/214, p = 0.846). The respective mean postoperative logMAR VAs were 0.45 ± 0.55 (Snellen 20/56) and 0.46 ± 0.59 (Snellen 20/58, p = 0.574). The single surgery success rate for the tunnel cohort was 87.3% versus 88.6% for the suture cohort (p = 0.601). Three patients (1.0%) in the scleral tunnel cohort developed postoperative strabismus, but only one patient (0.1%) in the suture cohort (p = 0.04, multivariate p = 0.76). All cases of strabismus occurred in eyes that underwent SB combined with PPV (p = 0.02). There were no differences in vision, anatomic success, or strabismus between scleral tunnels versus scleral sutures in eyes that underwent primary SB. Conclusion: Scleral tunnels and scleral sutures had similar postoperative outcomes. Combined PPV/SB in eyes with scleral tunnels might be a risk for strabismus post retinal detachment surgery

Suprachoroidal Space Injection Technique Expert Panel Guidance

Purpose: To develop professional guidelines for best practices for suprachoroidal space (SCS) injection, an innovative technique for retinal therapeutic delivery, based on current published evidence and clinical experience. Methods: A panel of expert ophthalmologists reviewed current published evidence and clinical experience during a live working group meeting to define points of consensus and key clinical considerations to inform the development of guidelines for in-office SCS injection. Results: Core consensus guidelines for in-office SCS injection were reached and reported by the expert panel. Current clinical evidence and physician experience supported SCS injection as a safe and effective method for delivering retinal and choroidal therapeutics. The panel established consensus on the rationale for SCS injection, including potential benefits relative to other intraocular delivery methods and current best practices in patient preparation, pre- and peri-injection management, SCS-specific injection techniques, and postinjection management and follow-up. Conclusion: These expert panel guidelines may support and promote standardization of SCS injection technique, with the goal of optimizing patient safety and outcomes. Some aspects of the procedure may reasonably be modified based on the clinical setting and physician judgment, as well as additional study

Leading Eye Institute to Participate in ACT\u27s Embryonic Stem Cell Clinical Trial for Macular Degeneration Wills Eye Institute receives IRB approval to treat dry-AMD using ACT\u27s hESC-derived retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells

Press release announcing: MARLBOROUGH, Mass., Jan 17, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. ( ACT ; OTCBB: ACTC), a leader in the field of regenerative medicine, today announced that the Wills Eye Institute in Philadelphia has received institutional review board (IRB) approval as a site for the Phase 1/2 clinical trial for dry age-related macular degeneration (dry AMD) using human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells