Fabrication of High-Quality Microfluidic Solid-Phase Chromatography Columns

Here we report a low-pressure bead packing technique for the robust integration of high-performance chromatography columns in poly­(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices made by multilayer soft lithography (MSL). A novel column geometry featuring micrometer-sized bypass channels along the entire length of the separation channel is used to achieve rapid packing of multiple high-quality bead bed columns in parallel with near-perfect yield. Pulse tests show that these microfluidic columns achieve exceptional reproducibility and efficiency, with measured plate counts of 1 650 000/m ± 7%, corresponding to a reduced plate height of <i>h</i> = 0.12 ± 7%. The combination of high-performance chromatography columns and valve-based microfluidics offers new opportunities for the integration of sample processing with preparative and analytical separations for biology and chemistry

Fabrication of High-Quality Microfluidic Solid-Phase Chromatography Columns

Here we report a low-pressure bead packing technique for the robust integration of high-performance chromatography columns in poly­(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices made by multilayer soft lithography (MSL). A novel column geometry featuring micrometer-sized bypass channels along the entire length of the separation channel is used to achieve rapid packing of multiple high-quality bead bed columns in parallel with near-perfect yield. Pulse tests show that these microfluidic columns achieve exceptional reproducibility and efficiency, with measured plate counts of 1 650 000/m ± 7%, corresponding to a reduced plate height of <i>h</i> = 0.12 ± 7%. The combination of high-performance chromatography columns and valve-based microfluidics offers new opportunities for the integration of sample processing with preparative and analytical separations for biology and chemistry

Microfluidic Integration of Parallel Solid-Phase Liquid Chromatography

We report the development of a fully integrated microfluidic chromatography system based on a recently developed column geometry that allows for robust packing of high-performance separation columns in poly­(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices having integrated valves made by multilayer soft lithography (MSL). The combination of parallel high-performance separation columns and on-chip plumbing was used to achieve a fully integrated system for on-chip chromatography, including all steps of automated sample loading, programmable gradient generation, separation, fluorescent detection, and sample recovery. We demonstrate this system in the separation of fluorescently labeled DNA and parallel purification of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplified variable regions of mouse immunoglobulin genes using a strong anion exchange (AEX) resin. Parallel sample recovery in an immiscible oil stream offers the advantage of low sample dilution and high recovery rates. The ability to perform nucleic acid size selection and recovery on subnanogram samples of DNA holds promise for on-chip genomics applications including sequencing library preparation, cloning, and sample fractionation for diagnostics

Highly multiplexed single-cell quantitative PCR

<div><p>We present a microfluidic device for rapid gene expression profiling in single cells using multiplexed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). This device integrates all processing steps, including cell isolation and lysis, complementary DNA synthesis, pre-amplification, sample splitting, and measurement in twenty separate qPCR reactions. Each of these steps is performed in parallel on up to 200 single cells per run. Experiments performed on dilutions of purified RNA establish assay linearity over a dynamic range of at least 10⁴, a qPCR precision of 15%, and detection sensitivity down to a single cDNA molecule. We demonstrate the application of our device for rapid profiling of microRNA expression in single cells. Measurements performed on a panel of twenty miRNAs in two types of cells revealed clear cell-to-cell heterogeneity, with evidence of spontaneous differentiation manifested as distinct expression signatures. Highly multiplexed microfluidic RT-qPCR fills a gap in current capabilities for single-cell analysis, providing a rapid and cost-effective approach for profiling panels of marker genes, thereby complementing single-cell genomics methods that are best suited for global analysis and discovery. We expect this approach to enable new studies requiring fast, cost-effective, and precise measurements across hundreds of single cells.</p></div

Methods for Multiplex Template Sampling in Digital PCR Assays

<div><p>The efficient use of digital PCR (dPCR) for precision copy number analysis requires high concentrations of target molecules that may be difficult or impossible to obtain from clinical samples. To solve this problem we present a strategy, called Multiplex Template Sampling (MTS), that effectively increases template concentrations by detecting multiple regions of fragmented target molecules. Three alternative assay approaches are presented for implementing MTS analysis of chromosome 21, providing a 10-fold concentration enhancement while preserving assay precision.</p></div

Multiplex Template Sampling (MTS) strategies.

<p>In the first, “short multiplex”, the sampling rate is raised by ten primer pairs in a multiplexed PCR with a common fluorescent probe for detection. The second method, “long multiplex”, is similar, but loci-specific primers are longer and we append a universal sequence to them. A third method, “repetitive simplex”, uses a single PCR assay designed to target chromosome-specific repetitive sequences.</p

Effect of volume on dPCR reactions.

<p>Performance of same PCR mixes as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0098341#pone-0098341-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1B</a> in 100 pL volumes. Two multiplexing approaches are compared: short primers and long primers plus a pair of universal primers. Multiplexing level in PCR reactions (horizontal axis) increases from 1× to 10×. Asterisks denote data points where difference between the two approaches was not significant (p = 0.05).</p

dPCR quality comparison between “short” and “long” multiplexing strategies.

<p>(<b>A</b>) Boxplots for comparison of Ct values (vertical axis) distribution in 2 nL PCR compartments filled with variable multiplexing level (horizontal axis) primer mixes. Upper panel – PCR mixes supplemented with short primers. Lower panel – PCR mixes supplemented with combination of long and plus a pair of universal primers. Red crosses denote outliers that are larger than the 75^th percentile plus 1.5× the interquartile range or smaller than the 25^th percentile minus 1.5× the interquartile range. This corresponds to approximately ±2.7σ and 99.3% coverage assuming that the data are normally distributed. (<b>B</b>) The ratio between mean fluorescence in positive chambers in dPCR arrays and background fluorescence in negative chambers.</p

Pairs of long and short oligonucleotides used in multiplexed PCR reactions.

<p>Short primers are shown in bold. The first ten pairs target different loci on chromosome 21. The last pair targets RNAse P on chromosome 6. The oligonucleotides used for long multiplex experiments are full sequences listed in the table, with the addition of the universal sequence GACTGACTGCGTAGGTATTATCG (designated as U1 in the table) for forward primers and CACAGGAAACAGCTATGACC (designated as U2 in the table) for the reverse at 5′ end of the primers. The primers used for the repetitive simplex experiments target ten loci on chromosome 21 and were CCTGGTCTGCACCCCAGTG and GTGCAGGAGCTGGTGCAG, and were used with probe #74 (Cat. #04688970001) from the Roche Universal Probe Library which anneals to the CTGCTGCCC motif.</p>*<p>Universal sequences on 5′ ends of long pairs are not shown.</p

Single cell mRNA expression.

<p>(A) Heatmap of expression values of six mRNA on 175 single K562 cells and 4 no cell controls (NCC). Each column represents a cell, and each row represents an assay. Replicate measurements are grouped according to assay. As expected, murine <i>Gapdh</i> is not detected, only spuriously generating signal in 4/525 detection chambers. No-cell controls are clearly distinguishable from those from single cells, with an average difference in magnitude greater than 100×. The variability between replicate measurements for each gene is much smaller than the variance in expression seen between different cells. (B) Distribution of the copy number of each gene measured in each single cell, along with the mean expression values obtained from previously published single-cell qPCR measurements [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191601#pone.0191601.ref010" target="_blank">10</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191601#pone.0191601.ref012" target="_blank">12</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191601#pone.0191601.ref014" target="_blank">14</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191601#pone.0191601.ref030" target="_blank">30</a>]. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation.</p