6 research outputs found
Depression and quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies
Background: Depression is one of the major psychiatric morbidities in cancer patients.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of depressive symptoms in the quality of life (QoL) of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and monoclonal
antibodies treatments.
Methods: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted between April and November
2016. To evaluate the QoL, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaire were
used. The patients were screened for depressive symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety
and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and those with a positive HADS-D positive questionnaire were referenced to the Psychiatry and Mental Health Department for further
assessment and follow-up.
Results: We included 45 female patients. Sixteen (35.6%) patients had a positive HADSD questionnaire and depressive symptoms confirmed by a psychiatric physician. Of those
patients, 7 (15.6%) had a major depressive episode confirmed by psychiatric interview.
There was a significant association of depressive symptoms with the future perspectives
scale (p = 0.022), breast symptoms scale (p = 0.011) and arm symptom scale (p = 0.005).
Significant differences were found in the fatigue (p = 0.024), pain (p = 0.037) and dyspnea
(p = 0.009) subscales being worse in patients with depressive symptoms. The association
between having depressive symptoms or not was shown to be significant or marginally
significant for the variables stage of the tumour (p = 0.057), presence of distant metastasis (p = 0.072) and previous diagnosis of depression (p = 0.011). The patients treated with
regimens containing monoclonal antibodies presented better outcomes in various subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-B23 questionnaires than those patients treated
with chemotherapy regimens without monoclonal antibodies.
Conclusions: Despite the small sample of our study, this study provided evidence that
depressive symptoms in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and
monoclonal antibodies treatments detrimentally reduced various aspects of Qo
Translation, Adaptation and Validation of a Portuguese Version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II
The prevalence of obesity has increased worldwide. An assessment of the impact of obesity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) requires specific instruments. The Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (MA-II)
is a widely used instrument to assess HRQoL in morbidly obese patients. The objective of this study was to translate and validate a Portuguese version of the MA-II.
The study included forward and backward translations of the original MA-II. The reliability of the Portuguese MA-II was estimated using the internal consistency and test-retest methods. For validation purposes, the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the Portuguese MA-II and the Portuguese versions of two other questionnaires, the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite). One hundred and fifty morbidly obese patients were randomly assigned to test the reliability and validity of the Portuguese MA-II. Good internal consistency was demonstrated by a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.80, and a very good agreement in terms of test-retest reliability was recorded, with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88. The total sums of MA-II scores and each item of MA-II were significantly correlated with all domains of SF-36 and IWQOL-Lite. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between theMA-II total score and BMI. Moreover, age, gender and surgical status were independent predictors of MA-II total score.
A reliable and valid Portuguese version of the MA-II was produced, thus enabling the routine use of MA-II in the morbidly obese Portuguese population
Depression and quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies
Recomendações para o diagnóstico e tratamento do adenocarcinoma gástrico (Grupo de Investigação de Cancro Digestivo)
.
Translation, Adaptation and Validation of a Portuguese Version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II
Delayed colorectal cancer care during covid-19 pandemic (decor-19). Global perspective from an international survey
Background
The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer (CRC) care during the pandemic.
Methods
The impact of COVID-19 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of CRC patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in CRC care. Respondents were divided into two comparator groups: 1) ‘delay’ group: CRC care affected by the pandemic; 2) ‘no delay’ group: unaltered CRC practice.
Results
A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the ‘delay’ (745, 70.9%) and ‘no delay’ (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to COVID-19 units, units fully dedicated to COVID-19 care, personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the ‘delay’ group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of CRC care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in COVID-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to COVID-19 units were statistically associated with unaltered CRC care in the ‘no delay’ group, while the geographical distribution was not.
Conclusions
Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic CRC practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health-care delivery systems, hospital’s preparedness, resources availability, and local COVID-19 prevalence rather than geographical factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize CRC care