The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior.

Managed care organizations use explicit financial incentives to influence physicians\u27 use of resources. This has contributed to concerns regarding conflicts of interest for physicians and adverse effects on the quality of patient care. In light of recent publicized legislative and legal battles about this issue, we reviewed the literature and analyzed studies that examine the effect of these explicit financial incentives on the behavior of physicians. The method used to undertake the literature review followed the approach set forth in the Cochrane Collaboration handbook. Our literature review revealed a paucity of data on the effect of explicit financial incentives. Based on this limited evidence, explicit incentives that place individual physicians at financial risk appear to be effective in reducing physician resource use. However, the empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of bonus payments on physician resource use is mixed. Similarly, our review revealed mixed effects of the influence of explicit financial incentives on the quality of patient care. The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior is complicated by a lack of understanding of the incentive structure by the managed care organization and the physician. The lack of a universally acceptable definition of quality renders it important that future researchers identify the term explicitly

The quality of care for Medicare patients with peptic ulcer disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine quality of care for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Collaborating with five Peer Review Organizations, we used 1995 Medicare claim files to select samples of inpatients with a principal diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Quality of care indicators developed by content experts included percentages for ulcer patients tested for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); biopsied patients who received tissue tests; H. pylori-positive patients who received appropriate therapy; and ulcer patients screened for preadmission nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and counseled about risks. RESULTS: Of 2,644 patients eligible for medical record review, 56% were tested for H. pylori, and 73% of those testing positive were treated appropriately; 84% of patients with endoscopic biopsies received a tissue test for H. pylori; 74% of patients were screened for preadmission NSAID use, 24% had documented counseling of NSAID use, and only 2% had documented counseling on the ulcer risk of NSAID use. Statistically significant regional variation occurred in four of six quality indicators. Outpatient records were reviewed for 529 patients to document prior outpatient H. pylori in this population; only 2% (n = 12) were tested for H. pylori in the year before admission. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve quality of care by testing for and treating H. pylori in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease and to improve screening for NSAIDs and counseling on ulcer risks

The quality of care for Medicare patients with peptic ulcer disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine quality of care for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Collaborating with five Peer Review Organizations, we used 1995 Medicare claim files to select samples of inpatients with a principal diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Quality of care indicators developed by content experts included percentages for ulcer patients tested for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); biopsied patients who received tissue tests; H. pylori-positive patients who received appropriate therapy; and ulcer patients screened for preadmission nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and counseled about risks. RESULTS: Of 2,644 patients eligible for medical record review, 56% were tested for H. pylori, and 73% of those testing positive were treated appropriately; 84% of patients with endoscopic biopsies received a tissue test for H. pylori; 74% of patients were screened for preadmission NSAID use, 24% had documented counseling of NSAID use, and only 2% had documented counseling on the ulcer risk of NSAID use. Statistically significant regional variation occurred in four of six quality indicators. Outpatient records were reviewed for 529 patients to document prior outpatient H. pylori in this population; only 2% (n = 12) were tested for H. pylori in the year before admission. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve quality of care by testing for and treating H. pylori in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease and to improve screening for NSAIDs and counseling on ulcer risks