Blue sensors : technology and cooperative monitoring in UN peacekeeping.

For over a half-century, the soldiers and civilians deployed to conflict areas in UN peacekeeping operations have monitored ceasefires and peace agreements of many types with varying degrees of effectiveness. Though there has been a significant evolution of peacekeeping, especially in the 1990s, with many new monitoring functions, the UN has yet to incorporate monitoring technologies into its operations in a systematic fashion. Rather, the level of technology depends largely on the contributing nations and the individual field commanders. In most missions, sensor technology has not been used at all. So the UN has not been able to fully benefit from the sensor technology revolution that has seen effectiveness greatly amplified and costs plummet. This paper argues that monitoring technologies need not replace the human factor, which is essential for confidence building in conflict areas, but they can make peacekeepers more effective, more knowledgeable and safer. Airborne, ground and underground sensors can allow peacekeepers to do better monitoring over larger areas, in rugged terrain, at night (when most infractions occur) and in adverse weather conditions. Technology also allows new ways to share gathered information with the parties to create confidence and, hence, better pre-conditions for peace. In the future sensors should become 'tools of the trade' to help the UN keep the peace in war-torn areas

Canadian Armed Forces Plaque

Square wood and metal plaque with the badge of the Canadian Armed Forces. The plaque reads, To His Excellency Kenneth M. Curtis with Best Wishes of the Chief of Defence Staff and the Canadian Armed Forces Jan, 1981 .https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/gov_curtis/1004/thumbnail.jp

R.W. Cue Engine Performance Monitoring and Troubleshooting Techniques for the CF-18 Aircraft

The F404-GE-400 engines of th