9 research outputs found

    Promoting Adherence to Influenza Vaccination Recommendations in Pediatric Practice.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: In the United States, nonadherence to seasonal influenza vaccination guidelines for children and adolescents is common and results in unnecessary morbidity and mortality. We conducted a quality improvement project to improve vaccination rates and test effects of 2 interventions on vaccination guidelines adherence. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized control trial with 11 primary care practices (PRACTICE) that provided care for 11 293 individual children and adolescents in a children\u27s health care system from September 2015 through April 2016. Practice sites (with their clinicians) were randomly assigned to 4 arms (no intervention [Control], computerized clinical decision support system [CCDSS], web-based training [WBT], or CCDSS and WBT [BOTH]). RESULTS: During the study, 55.8% of children and adolescents received influenza vaccination, which improved modestly during the study period compared with the prior influenza season ( P = .009). Actual adherence to recommendations, including dosing, timeliness, and avoidance of missed opportunities, was 46.4% of patients cared for by the PRACTICE. The WBT was most effective in promoting adherence with vaccination recommendations with an estimated average odds ratio = 1.26, P \u3c .05, to compare between preintervention and intervention periods. Over the influenza season, there was a significantly increasing trend in odds ratio in the WBT arm ( P \u3c .05). Encouraging process improvements and providing longitudinal feedback on monthly rate of vaccination sparked some practice changes but limited impact on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based training at the start of influenza season with monthly reports of adherence can improve correct dose and timing of influenza vaccination with modest impact on overall vaccination rate

    Replacement of HA-MRSA by CA-MRSA infections at an academic medical center in the midwestern United States, 2004-5 to 2008.

    No full text
    We noted anecdotally that infections designated as health care-associated (HA-) MRSA by epidemiologic criteria seemed to be decreasing in incidence at the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) after 2004. We compared MRSA patients seen at any site of clinical care at UCMC and the isolates that caused their infections in 2004-5 (n = 545) with those in 2008 (n = 135). The percent of patients with MRSA infections cultured > 2 days after hospital admission decreased from 19.5% in 2004-5 to 7.4% in 2008 (p = 0.001). The percent in 2004-5 compared with 2008 who had a hospitalization (49.1% to 26.7%, p = 0.001) or surgery (43.0% to 14.1%, p<0.001) in the previous year decreased. In 2008 a greater percent of patients was seen in the emergency department (23.1% vs. 39.3%) and a smaller percent both in intensive care units (15.6% vs. 6.7%) and in other inpatient units (40.7% vs. 32.6%) (p<0.001). The percent of patients with CA-MRSA infections by the CDC epidemiologic criteria increased from 36.5% in 2004-5 to 62.2% in 2008 (p<0.001). The percent of MRSA isolates sharing genetic characteristics of USA100 decreased from 27.9% (152/545) to 12.6% (17/135), while the percent with CA-MRSA (USA300) characteristics increased from 53.2% (290/545) to 66.7% (90/135). The percent of infections that were invasive did not change significantly. Our data suggest that HA-MRSA infections, both by epidemiologic and microbiologic criteria, relative to CA-MRSA, decreased between 2004-5 and 2008 at UCMC

    Association of High-Level Mupirocin Resistance and Multidrug-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an Academic Center in the Midwestern United Statesâ–¿

    No full text
    Mupirocin is a topical antimicrobial used to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, usually in the absence of susceptibility testing. We hypothesized that high-level (HL) mupirocin resistance was associated with multidrug resistance (MDR). To this end, unique patient isolates identified at our institution during 2008 were stratified into those resistant to ≥3 non-β-lactam antimicrobial classes (MDR) and non-MDR MRSA. HL mupirocin resistance was screened by mupA PCR on all MDR isolates (n = 191) and a 20% random sample (n = 130) of non-MDR isolates; E-testing confirmed HL resistance. We found that among MDR isolates, 13 (6.8%) carried mupA, whereas none of the non-MDR isolates did (P = 0.001). Thus, although the overall prevalence of HL mupirocin resistance is low among MRSA isolates at our institution, an association exists between mupA carriage and MDR. Using genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling, we identified nine HL mupirocin-resistant clones. Whereas the majority of mupA-negative MDR isolates had a health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) genotype (multilocus sequence type 5 [ST5] or SCCmec type II), the majority of mupA-positive MDR isolates had a community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) genotype (ST8 or SCCmec type IV). However, CA- and HA-MRSA genotypes were more evenly distributed among mupA-positive isolates compared to mupA-negative MDR isolates. Thus, in Chicago, mupA is circulating among both CA- and HA-MRSA backgrounds

    Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections at UCMC in 2004-5 and 2008.

    No full text
    a<p>The p-value was determined using the χ-square or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate; for mutually exclusive categorical variables a single test was performed to compare the distribution of the data for 2004-5 with the data for 2008.</p>b<p>Includes cholecystitis, conjunctivitis, peritonitis and upper respiratory infection.</p>c<p>Denominators for HA-MRSA risk factors in 2004-5 exclude those interviewed patients who answered that that they did not know information requested of them and those patients about whom risk factor information could not be determined from chart review. Information regarding a stay in a long-term care facility for 2004-5 patients was determined only for those patients lacking another health-care risk factor for HA-MRSA infection. For 2008 patients, this was evaluated for all 135 enrolled.</p

    Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates at UCMC from 2004-5 and 2008.

    No full text
    a<p>MLST clonal complex designations vary with time. The clonal cluster designations indicated here were accurate at the conclusion of 2008.</p>b<p><i>slv</i>, single locus variant with no assigned multilocus sequence type (MLST).</p>c<p>1-31-1-1-12-1-40 denote the allotypes of 7 genes (<i>arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi,</i> and <i>yqiL</i>) that determine this undefined MLST type.</p>d<p>7 MRSA isolates from 2004-5 had multiple or no <i>ccr</i> genes and were thus considered nontypable.</p>e<p>Includes intermediate susceptibility results as resistant. In some cases, isolates were not tested for clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin susceptibility, and the number tested are indicated in the table as the denominator for each relevant category.</p
    corecore