6 research outputs found

    Reglamento de los Reales Caballeros Hospitalarios Españoles de San Juan Bautista

    Get PDF
    Copia digital. Valladolid : Junta de Castilla y LeĂłn. ConsejerĂ­a de Cultura y Turismo, 2009-2010Fecha de la Real Ăłrden: 188

    Safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic response of regadenoson for stress perfusion CMR

    Get PDF
    Owing to its pharmacodynamics and posology, the use of regadenoson for stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has potential advantages over other vasodilators. We sought to evaluate the safety, hemodynamic response and diagnostic performance of regadenoson stress-CMR in routine clinical practice. All regadenoson stress-CMR examinations performed between May 2017 and July 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 698 studies were included for the final analysis. A conventional stress/rest protocol was performed using a 1.5T MRI scanner (Magnetom Aera, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Adverse events, clinical symptoms, and hemodynamic response were assessed. Diagnostic accuracy of the test was evaluated in patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography. Nearly half of patients (48.5%) remained asymptomatic. Most common clinical symptoms included dyspnea (137, 19.6%), chest pain (116, 16.6%) and flushing (44, 6.3%). Two patients (0.28%) could not complete the examination due to severe hypotension or unbearable chest pain. Overall, an increase in heart rate (HR) response (36.2% [IQR: 22.5–50.9]) and a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (median systolic BP response of -5% [IQR: -11.5-0.6]; median diastolic BP response of -6.3 mmHg [IQR: -13.4-0]) was observed. Patients with symptoms induced by regadenoson showed higher HR response (40.3%, IQR: 26.4–56.1 vs. 32.4%, IQR: 19-45.6, p<0.001), whereas a blunted HR response was observed in diabetic (29.6%, IQR: 18.4–42 p<0.001), obese (31.7%, IQR: 20.7–46.2 p=0.005) and patients aged 70 years or older (32.9%, IQR: 22.6–43.1 p<0.001). Overall, regadenoson stress-CMR showed 95.65% (IQ 91.49–99.81) sensitivity, 54.84% (IQ 35.71–73.97) specificity, 86.99% (IQ 82.74–94.68) positive predictive value, and 77.27% (IQ 57.49–97.06) negative predictive value for detecting significant coronary stenosis as compared with invasive coronary angiography. Regadenoson is a well-tolerated vasodilator that can be safely employed for stress perfusion CMR, with high diagnostic performanc

    Act relative to the enforcement of the preceding agreement

    No full text

    Long-term prognostic value of coronary CTA in orthotopic heart transplant recipients

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of coronary CTA (CCTA) in heart transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The records of 114 patients who had undergone a heart transplant (mean age, 61.7 ± 11.1 [SD] years; 83.3% men) and who underwent CCTA for the surveillance of coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) from June 2007 to December 2017 were retrospectively evaluated for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularization, cardiac arrhythmias, stroke, and retransplant). Patients were classified according to the presence of nonobstructive CAV (lumen reduction < 50%) or obstructive disease (lumen reduction ≄ 50%) and using a coronary segment involvement score (SIS). Differences in MACE rate between groups were compared. RESULTS. Obstructive CAV was observed in 12 heart transplant recipients (10.5%). During a mean follow-up of 67.5 ± 41.4 months the overall rates of MACE were 50% and 14.7% in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive CAV, respectively (p < .05), resulting in an odds ratio for MACE of 6 (95% CI, 1.7–21.2). Comparison of event-free survival showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 5 (95% CI, 1.95–13; p =. 004) for patients with obstructive disease. The presence of four or more stenotic coronary segments (SIS ≄ 4) was associated with a higher rate of events (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.46–8.23). CONCLUSION. In patients who have undergone a heart transplant, CCTA offers a significant long-term prognostic impact on the prediction of MACEs
    corecore