40 research outputs found

    UPDATED: Federal Reserve: Emergency Lending ( Effective March 27, 2020)

    Get PDF

    Costs of Government Interventions in Response to the Financial Crisis: A Retrospective

    Get PDF

    Title IV Provisions of the CARES Act(P.L. 116-136)

    Get PDF

    COVID-19: Commercial Paper Market Strains and Federal Government Support

    Get PDF

    The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and Current Financial Turmoil: Issues and Analysis

    Get PDF
    CRS Report for Congress: The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and Current Financial Turmoil: Issues and Analysi

    Accelerated Vehicle Retirement for Fuel Economy: “Cash for Clunkers”

    Get PDF

    Understanding and enhancing future infrastructure resiliency: a socio-ecological approach

    Get PDF
    The resilience of any system, human or natural, centres on its capacity to adapt its structure, but not necessarily its function, to a new configuration in response to long-term socio-ecological change. In the long term, therefore, enhancing resilience involves more than simply improving a system's ability to resist an immediate threat or to recover to a stable past state. However, despite the prevalence of adaptive notions of resilience in academic discourse, it is apparent that infrastructure planners and policies largely continue to struggle to comprehend longer-term system adaptation in their understanding of resilience. Instead, a short-term, stable system (STSS) perspective on resilience is prevalent. This paper seeks to identify and problematise this perspective, presenting research based on the development of a heuristic 'scenario-episode' tool to address, and challenge, it in the context of United Kingdom infrastructure resilience. The aim is to help resilience practitioners to understand better the capacities of future infrastructure systems to respond to natural, malicious threats

    The terror that underpins the ‘peace’: The political economy of Colombia’s paramilitary demobilisation process

    Get PDF
    Studies on terrorism have traditionally focused on non-state actors who direct violence against liberal states. Such studies have also tended to focus on political motivations and, therefore, have neglected the economic functions of terrorism. This article challenges the divorce of the political and economic spheres by highlighting how states can use terrorism to realise interconnected political and economic goals. To demonstrate this, we take the case of the paramilitary demobilisation process in Colombia and show how it relates to the US-Colombian free trade agreement (FTA). We argue that the demobilisation process fulfils a dual role. Firstly, the process aims to improve the image of the Colombian government required to pass the controversial FTA through US Congress in order to protect large amounts of US investment in the country. Secondly, the demobilisation process serves to mask clear continuities in paramilitary terror which serve mutually supportive political and economic functions for US investment in Colombia
    corecore