Minimally invasive surgical management of primary venous ulcers vs. compression treatment: a randomized clinical trial

n/

Surgical management of ascending saphenous thrombophlebitis.

Background. Acute saphenous vein ascending thrombophlebitis is recognised to be a dangerous condition due to the reported high incidence of deep vein thrombus involvement and possibly fatal pulmonary embolism. We assessed the accuracy of duplex scanning in determining the extent of thrombosis as well as the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 146 patients referred to our Vascular Laboratory for acute superficial thrombophlebitis from 1987 to 1997. Duplex scanning identified 85 cases of superficial thrombophlebitis involving at least a segment of the saphenous vein localised below the knee (58.2%); 37 of thrombophlebitis extending into both the superficial and deep venous systems (25.3%), and 24 of saphenous thrombosis extending to within 5 cm of the saphenofemoral junction (16.4%). The latter group underwent saphenofemoral disconnection. We compared the preoperative duplex with the surgical reports and evaluated the surgical results. Results. We did not observe any complication. Return to work and normal activity occurred within 3-5 days. When varicose vein thrombectomy was performed concurrently, the patients had better postoperative pain control. Conclusions. Duplex scanning showed 100% accuracy both in determining the presence of thrombosis and its extent. Saphenofemoral disconnection for thrombosis involving the saphenofemoral junction is a safe procedure and can be performed on an outpatient basis

Varicose vein stripping vs. haemodynamic correction (c.h.i.v.a.): a long term randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term results of stripping vs. haemodynamic correction (Ambulatory Conservative Haemodynamic Management of Varicose Veins, CHIVA) in the treatment of superficial venous incompetence resulting in chronic venous disease (CVD). DESIGN: Randomised comparative trial. PATIENTS: 150 patients affected by CVD, CEAP clinical class 2-6, were randomised to saphenous stripping or to CHIVA. METHODS: The clinical outcome was assessed by an independent observer who recorded the Hobbs clinical score for treated limbs. A subjective report of the outcome was provided by the patients. Recurrence of varices was assessed by both clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10 years, 26 patients were lost to follow-up. The Hobbs score similar in the stripping and CHIVA groups. However recurrence of varicose veins was significantly higher in the stripping group (CHIVA 18%; stripping 35%, P<0.04 Fisher's exact test), without significant differences in the rate of recurrences from the sapheno-femoral junction. The associated risk of recurrence at ten years was doubled in the stripping group (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1-5, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent varices occurred more frequently following saphenous stripping than after CHIVA treatment. The deliberate preservation of the saphenous trunk as a route of venous drainage in the CHIVA group may have been a factor reducing the recurrence rate

Haemodynamic CHIVA correction surgery versus compression for primary venous ulcers: first year results

Objective: To compare two different treatments for primary venous ulcers: a minimally invasive surgical technique for the haemodynamic correction of reflux, versus a traditional compression treatment. Method: From a cohort of 87 lower extremities affected by the first episode of venous ulcers, 45 mobile patients affected by primary chronic venous insufficiency were randomized to receive either the haemodynamic correction procedure (CHIVA) or compression treatment. Results: Mean follow up lasted one year. The rate of healing in the surgical group was 100% in a mean time of 29 days with a velocity of 2.86 mm2/day,and in the conservative group the rate was 96% in 61 days, with a velocity of 1.66 mm2/day (P<0.02). All air plethysmographic parameters, with the exception of ejection fraction, significantly improved at six months in the surgical group. Finally, quality of life significantly improved in both groups, but in the surgical group the following domains were significantly different compared with the compression group: RP, role limitations due to physical problems; VT, energy/vitality; SF, social functioning; RE, role limitations due to emotional problems; and MH, mental health. Conclusions: Surgical haemodynamic correction of reflux has been demonstrated to improve venous function, time to ulcer healing and quality of life when compared with compression treatment