New Pharmacological Agents to Aid Smoking Cessation and Tobacco Harm Reduction: What has been Investigated and What is in the Pipeline?

A wide range of support is available to help smokers to quit and aid attempts at harm reduction, including three first-line smoking cessation medications: nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline and bupropion. Despite the efficacy of these, there is a continual need to diversify the range of medications so that the needs of tobacco users are met. This paper compares the first-line smoking cessation medications to: 1) two variants of these existing products: new galenic formulations of varenicline and novel nicotine delivery devices; and 2) twenty-four alternative products: cytisine (novel outside of central and eastern Europe), nortriptyline, other tricyclic antidepressants, electronic cigarettes, clonidine (an anxiolytic), other anxiolytics (e.g. buspirone), selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors, supplements (e.g. St John’s wort), silver acetate, nicobrevin, modafinil, venlafaxine, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), opioid antagonist, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) antagonists, glucose tablets, selective cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists, nicotine vaccines, drugs that affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission, drugs that affect N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDA), dopamine agonists (e.g. levodopa), pioglitazone (Actos; OMS405), noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and the weight management drug lorcaserin. Six criteria are used: relative efficacy, relative safety, relative cost, relative use (overall impact of effective medication use), relative scope (ability to serve new groups of patients), and relative ease of use (ESCUSE). Many of these products are in the early stages of clinical trials, however, cytisine looks most promising in having established efficacy and safety and being of low cost. Electronic cigarettes have become very popular, appear to be efficacious and are safer than smoking, but issues of continued dependence and possible harms need to be considered

Replication and Fine Mapping for Association of the C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6 Genes with Prostate Cancer in the Chinese Population

Prostate cancer represents the leading cause of male death across the world. A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified five novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in the Japanese population. This study is to replicate and fine map the potential association of these five loci with prostate cancer in the Chinese Han population.In Phase I of the study, we tested the five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which showed the strongest association evidence in the original GWAS in Japanese. The study sample consists of 1,169 Chinese Hans, comprising 483 patients and 686 healthy controls. Then in phase II, flanking SNPs of the successfully replicated SNPs in Phase I were genotyped and tested for association with prostate cancer to fine map those significant association signals.We successfully replicated the association of rs13385191 (located in the C2orf43 gene, P = 8.60×10(-5)), rs12653946 (P = 1.33×10(-6)), rs1983891 (FOXP4, P = 6.22×10(-5)), and rs339331 (GPRC6A/RFX6, P = 1.42×10(-5)) with prostate cancer. The most significant odds ratio (OR) was recorded as 1.41 (95% confidence interval 1.18-1.68) for rs12653946. Rs9600079 did not show significant association (P = 8.07×10(-2)) with prostate cancer in this study. The Phase II study refined these association signals, and identified several SNPs showing more significant association with prostate cancer than the very SNPs tested in Phase I.Our results provide further support for association of the C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6 genes with prostate cancer in Eastern Asian populations. This study also characterized the novel loci reported in the original GWAS with more details. Further work is still required to determine the functional variations and finally clarify the underlying biological mechanisms

Abstract P3-04-02: Molecular analysis of breast cancers from individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes secondary to mutations in <i>BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2,</i> and<i> PALB2</i>

Abstract Background: Despite a growing understanding of the somatic landscape of breast tumors from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, less is known about breast tumors from carriers of germline mutations in other homologous recombination and DNA repair pathway genes such as ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2. Methods: We identified 44 clinically annotated breast cancer cases that included carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 (n=9), BRCA2 (n=9), ATM (n=5), CHEK2 (n=7), and PALB2 (n=6) from the Hereditary Cancer Risk Program at BUMC. Sporadic breast cancers cases (n=8) were also collected. Genomic DNA and RNA were extracted from macro-dissected FFPE tumor sections, adjacent normal FFPE tissue, along with constitutional genomic DNA from blood. Expanded whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on normal/tumor pairs and RNA-seq from tumors for each case. Bioinformatics analysis was performed using industry standard methods for somatic characterization. Results: All germline mutations were confirmed by WES. Somatic mutational analysis and copy number profiling from WES revealed the greatest similarities among BRCA1 and CHEK2 carriers. As expected, TP53 mutations were found in 8 of 9 BRCA1 carriers as all were triple negative subtype. We also detected somatic TP53 mutations in tumors from 4 of 7 CHEK2 carriers. Somatic TP53 mutations were found in only 1 of 7 BRCA2 tumors and 1 of 4 PALB2 tumors tested. Furthermore, BRCA1 and CHEK2 tumors showed trends of having higher mutation burden. Analysis of copy number BRCAness demonstrated stronger similarities between BRCA1, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 tumors. BRCA2 tumors were unique with fewer events and characterized by specific amplifications including 11q23 (CCND1) and 17q23 (BRIP1). Hierarchical clustering of RNA-seq data revealed strong clustering of BRCA1 tumors compared to all other tumors, predominantly attributed to breast cancer subtype. Furthermore, pathway analysis of genes that distinguish BRCA1 mutation positive versus non-BRCA mutated tumors showed strong correlation to pro-inflammatory and immune pathway signatures. Conclusions: Molecular analysis of 44 breast cancers from individuals with inherited predisposition to breast cancer via BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 germline mutations demonstrated strongest somatic similarities between BRCA1 and CHEK2 tumors although all BRCA1 were TNBC and all CHEK2 tumors were ER positive. Marked differential gene expression differences in RNA expression patterns were observed in BRCA1 mutation carriers compared with all other groups analyzed. Our study is among the first to interrogate the profile of non-BRCA mutated hereditary breast cancers. Citation Format: Blum JL, Wong S, Pearson EJ, Nair A, Snipes GJ, Briones N, Baker A, Cropp CD, Carpten JD. Molecular analysis of breast cancers from individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes secondary to mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-04-02.</jats:p

Transbronchial fine needle aspiration in clinical practice

We review our experience of transbronchial fine needle aspiration (TBFNA) over a 3-year period. A total of 112 TBFNAs were performed on 95 patients. Four aspirates were from peripheral lung lesions, 20 from non-ulcerated submucosal infiltrative lesions, 19 from mediastinal abnormalities close to the tracheobronchial tree, and the remaining 69 were for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma with apparent mediastinal lymph node spread, evaluated by chest computed tomography (CT). In the 20 submucosal lesions TBFNA reached a sensitivity of 82.3%, providing the only evidence of a malignant process in five cases. With respect to the 19 mediastinal lesions arising in close proximity to the central airways, TBFNA permitted a diagnosis in cases that would otherwise have required more invasive procedures, although the diagnostic sensitivity of the technique in this group of patients was poor (26%). In the mediastinal staging group, the sensitivity was 76.9%, with no false positive results. Complete sensitivity of TBFNA for the detection of disease was 65.8%. We conclude that TBFNA is a reliable and low risk procedure.29228SCI

Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs

Some patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy benefit from combination therapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Additionally, virtually all epilepsy patients will receive, at some time in their lives, other medications for the management of associated conditions. In these situations, clinically important drug interactions may occur. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone induce many cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glucuronyl transferase (GT) enzymes, and can reduce drastically the serum concentration of associated drugs which are substrates of the same enzymes. Examples of agents whose serum levels are decreased markedly by enzyme-inducing AEDs, include lamotrigine, tiagabine, several steroidal drugs, cyclosporin A, oral anticoagulants and many cardiovascular, antineoplastic and psychotropic drugs. Valproic acid is not enzyme inducer, but it may cause clinically relevant drug interactions by inhibiting the metabolism of selected substrates, most notably phenobarbital and lamotrigine. Compared with older generation agents, most of the recently developed AEDs are less likely to induce or inhibit the activity of CYP or GT enzymes. However, they may be a target for metabolically mediated drug interactions, and oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, felbamate and, at high dosages, topiramate may stimulate the metabolism of oral contraceptive steroids. Levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin have not been reported to cause or be a target for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions involving AEDs have not been well characterized, but their understanding is important for a more rational approach to combination therapy. In particular, neurotoxic effects appear to be more likely with coprescription of AEDs sharing the same primary mechanism of action

Two-stage Study of Familial Prostate Cancer by Whole-exome Sequencing and Custom Capture Identifies 10 Novel Genes Associated with the Risk of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: Family history of prostate cancer (PCa) is a well-known risk factor, and both common and rare genetic variants are associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To detect new genetic variants associated with PCa, capitalizing on the role of family history and more aggressive PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A two-stage design was used. In stage one, whole-exome sequencing was used to identify potential risk alleles among affected men with a strong family history of disease or with more aggressive disease (491 cases and 429 controls). Aggressive disease was based on a sum of scores for Gleason score, node status, metastasis, tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, systemic recurrence, and time to PCa death. Genes identified in stage one were screened in stage two using a custom-capture design in an independent set of 2917 cases and 1899 controls. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Frequencies of genetic variants (singly or jointly in a gene) were compared between cases and controls. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Eleven genes previously reported to be associated with PCa were detected (ATM, BRCA2, HOXB13, FAM111A, EMSY, HNF1B, KLK3, MSMB, PCAT1, PRSS3, and TERT), as well as an additional 10 novel genes (PABPC1, QK1, FAM114A1, MUC6, MYCBP2, RAPGEF4, RNASEH2B, ULK4, XPO7, and THAP3). Of these 10 novel genes, all but PABPC1 and ULK4 were primarily associated with the risk of aggressive PCa. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach demonstrates the advantage of gene sequencing in the search for genetic variants associated with PCa and the benefits of sampling patients with a strong family history of disease or an aggressive form of disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: Multiple genes are associated with prostate cancer (PCa) among men with a strong family history of this disease or among men with an aggressive form of PCa