Comparison of quality control for trauma management between Western and Eastern European trauma center

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Quality control of trauma care is essential to define the effectiveness of trauma center and trauma system. To identify the troublesome issues of the system is the first step for validation of the focused customized solutions. This is a comparative study of two level I trauma centers in Italy and Romania and it has been designed to give an overview of the entire trauma care program adopted in these two countries. This study was aimed to use the results as the basis for recommending and planning changes in the two trauma systems for a better trauma care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively reviewed a total of 182 major trauma patients treated in the two hospitals included in the study, between January and June 2002. Every case was analyzed according to the recommended minimal audit filters for trauma quality assurance by The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Satisfactory yields have been reached in both centers for the management of head and abdominal trauma, airway management, Emergency Department length of stay and early diagnosis and treatment. The main significant differences between the two centers were in the patients' transfers, the leadership of trauma team and the patients' outcome. The main concerns have been in the surgical treatment of fractures, the outcome and the lacking of documentation.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The analyzed hospitals are classified as Level I trauma center and are within the group of the highest quality level centers in their own countries. Nevertheless, both of them experience major lacks and for few audit filters do not reach the mmum standard requirements of ACS Audit Filters. The differences between the western and the eastern European center were slight. The parameters not reaching the minimum requirements are probably occurring even more often in suburban settings.</p

Traumi toraco-addominali

Gli autori affrontano il tema complesso dei traumi toracoaddominali dal punto di vista fisiopatologico e del trattamento d'urgenza mirando soprattutto alle attuali visioni clinico terapeutiche

il paziente chirurgico complesso

gli autori prendendo in rassena i principali sistemi di punteggio relativi allo score di gravità dei pazienti,focalizzano il buon risultato terapeutico come funzione di un sistema comune gestionale più che alle singole capacità professionali

Surgical management of trauma: from the "golden hour" to the "Golden Day"

The treatment of the "trauma" has individualized objective therapeutic to reach in the first phase of clinical management defined by Mattox in the concept of the Golden Hour, that consist to transport the patient to the fittest hospital and to recognize and to treat the priorities "ABCDE", identifies in ATLS Guideline. The evolution of the organization for the treatment of the trauma has developed the concept of Trauma System to whose apex there are of the structures devoted define Trauma Center, with specificity of structures and functions, personal devoted fully grown with a specific run. In the Trauma Center is possible to get a therapeutic planning according to the priorities of the case in few times so that to not only achieve the objective to treat in emergency the vital lesions, but to do the necessary treatments precociously to prevent the compliances of the patient, that is checked in environment then multidisciplinary intensive care. This systematic treatment by objective it allows to identify some Guideline of surgical treatment for priority in once defined Golden Day