Physician, organizational, and patient factors associated with suboptimal blood pressure mManagement in Type 2 diabetic patients in primary care

OBJECTIVE - To assess the quality of hypertension care in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice and identify physician, organizational, and patient factors associated with sub-optimal care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Data from 895 randomly selected diabetic patients were extracted from the electronic medical records of 95 general practitioners. Physician and organizational characteristics were collected with a questionnaire. We conducted a multilevel analysis to identify associations with blood pressure registration, hypertension treatment, and achievement of target blood pressure levels. RESULTS - For 652 patients (73%), a blood pressure measurement was recorded in the last year. Of these patients, 132 (20%) reached a target level of 135/85 mmHg. In total, 595 patients were classified as having hypertension, of whom 192 received no treatment (32%), 193 received an ACE inbibitor (32%), and 210 received other antihypertensives. Patients visiting a diabetes facility, referred to a specialist, with a female general practitioner, or with a general practitioner with < less-than-or-equal-to >10 years work experience had better recordings of their blood pressure. Suboptimal treatment was higher in older patients and smoking patients. Treatment was better in patients with coronary comorbidity, hyperlipidemia, or those referred to a specialist. Not achieving the blood pressure target was related to older age of the patients CONCLUSIONS - Hypertension management of type 2 diabetic patients in primary care is suboptimal. Characteristics of general practitioners as well as additional care provided by a diabetes facility or a specialist are associated with better processes of care, but blood pressure outcomes are not as clearly related to these factors

C-reactive protein to rule out complicated pneumococcal disease manifestations: a retrospective cohort study in adults with pneumococcal bacteraemia

OBJECTIVES: To explore the negative predictive value (NPV) of C-reactive protein (CRP) at admission to exclude complicated disease manifestations of pneumococcal disease. METHODS: A Dutch multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted between 01-01-2012 and 30-06-2020. Adults with positive blood cultures for Streptococcus pneumoniae, whose CRP was measured at admission and whose infection focus was known, were included. Electronic medical and microbiological records were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 832 bacteraemic patients enrolled, 30% had complicated manifestations of pneumococcal disease; most frequent were pleural effusion (8.9%), pleural empyema (5.4%) and meningitis (7.5%). Compared to solitary pneumonia, patients with pleural effusion and empyema presented with higher CRP levels. Although low CRP levels did not exclude complicated disease in general, a CRP level 114 mg/L, such that suspicion of empyema could only be ruled out in a minority of cases (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Complicated manifestations are prevalent in adult pneumococcal bacteraemia. Low blood CRP levels can reliably exclude the development of pulmonary empyema. Practical value may be largest in settings without thoracic imaging at hand