A methodology to estimate the potential to move inpatient to one day surgery

BACKGROUND: The proportion of surgery performed as a day case varies greatly between countries. Low rates suggest a large growth potential in many countries. Measuring the potential development of one day surgery should be grounded on a comprehensive list of eligible procedures, based on a priori criteria, independent of local practices. We propose an algorithmic method, using only routinely available hospital data to identify surgical hospitalizations that could have been performed as one day treatment. METHODS: Moving inpatient surgery to one day surgery was considered feasible if at least one surgical intervention was eligible for one day surgery and if none of the following criteria were present: intervention or affection requiring an inpatient stay, patient transferred or died, and length of stay greater than four days. The eligibility of a procedure to be treated as a day case was mainly established on three a priori criteria: surgical access (endoscopic or not), the invasiveness of the procedure and the size of the operated organ. Few overrides of these criteria occurred when procedures were associated with risk of immediate complications, slow physiological recovery or pain treatment requiring hospital infrastructure. The algorithm was applied to a random sample of one million inpatient US stays and more than 600 thousand Swiss inpatient stays, in the year 2002. RESULTS: The validity of our method was demonstrated by the few discrepancies between the a priori criteria based list of eligible procedures, and a state list used for reimbursement purposes, the low proportion of hospitalizations eligible for one day care found in the US sample (4.9 versus 19.4% in the Swiss sample), and the distribution of the elective procedures found eligible in Swiss hospitals, well supported by the literature. There were large variations of the proportion of candidates for one day surgery among elective surgical hospitalizations between Swiss hospitals (3 to 45.3%). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach allows the monitoring of the proportion of inpatient stay candidates for one day surgery. It could be used for infrastructure planning, resources negotiation and the surveillance of appropriate resource utilization

Ambulatory Care and orthopaedic capacity planning

Ambulatory Care facilities (often referred to as diagnosis and treatment centres) separate the routine elective activity from the uncertainty of complex inpatient and emergency treatment. Only routine patients with predictable outcomes should be treated in Ambulatory Care. Hence the centre should be able to plan its activities effectively. This paper considers the consequences for the remaining elective inpatient bed and theatre requirements. Computer models are used to simulate many years of activity in an orthopaedic department at a typical District General hospital. The adoption of Ambulatory Care will increase the proportion of day case treatment but the reduction in the overall bed requirement will be relatively small (at most 10%). Separating the elective theatre activity into day case and inpatient sessions will tend to produce inpatient theatre sessions with a disproportionate number of longer procedures. This can reduce overall theatre utilisation by up to 15%, which implies the need for an increase of up to 18% in the number of theatre sessions if waiting times are to be maintained