Reproducibility of Ablated Volume Measurement Is Higher with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound than with B-Mode Ultrasound after Benign Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation—A Preliminary Study

The reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and standard B-mode ultrasound in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules was compared. A preliminary study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules between 2014 and 2016, with available CEUS and B-mode post-ablation checks. CEUS and B-mode images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of ablated volume (Bland-Altman test). For CEUS, the mean inter-observer difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.219 mL (-0.372-0.809 mL); for B-mode, the mean difference was 0.880 mL (-1.655-3.414 mL). Reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (85%) than for B-mode (27%). Mean intra-observer differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.013 mL (0.803-4.097 mL) for Reader 1 and 0.031 mL (0.763-3.931 mL) for Reader 2 using CEUS, while they were 0.567 mL (-2.180-4.317 mL, Reader 1) and 0.759 mL (-2.584-4.290 mL, Reader 2) for B-mode. Intra-observer reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (96% and 95%, for the two readers) than for B-mode (21% and 23%). In conclusion, CEUS had higher reproducibility and inter- and intra-observer agreement compared to conventional B-mode in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules

Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence : a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study

Background: Bone strain index (BSI) is a tool measuring bone strain, derived from dual x-ray photon absorptiometry. It is able to characterise an aspect of bone quality that, joined to the quantity and quality parameters of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), permits an accurate definition of fracture risk. As no data are available about BSI precision, our aim was to assess its in vitro reproducibility. Methods: A Hologic spine phantom was used to perform BSI scans with three different scan modes: fast array (FA), array (A), and high definition (HD). Different soft tissue thicknesses (1, 3, 6 cm) of fresh pork rind layers as a surrogate of abdominal fat were interposed. For each scan mode, the phantom was consecutively scanned 25 times without repositioning. Results: In all scan modes (FA, A, HD) and at every fat thickness, BSI reproducibility was lower than that of BMD. The highest reproducibility was found using HD-mode with 1 cm of pork rind and the lowest one using HD-mode with 6 cm of pork rind. Increasing fat thickness, BSI reproducibility tended to decrease. BSI least significant change appeared to be about three times that of BMD in all modalities and fat thicknesses. Without pork rind superimposition and with 1-cm fat layer, BSI reproducibility was highest with HD-mode; with 3 or 6 cm fat thickness, it was higher with A-mode. Conclusions: BSI reproducibility was worse than that of BMD, but it is less sensitive to fat thickness increase, similarly to TBS

Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study

Objectives Bone strain index (BSI) is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived index of bone strength obtained from lumbar densitometric scan. We estimated the reproducibility of BSI in healthy women with different body mass index. Methods We enrolled postmenopausal women (mean age +/- SD: 66 +/- 10 years) divided into three groups (A, B and C) according to body mass index (BMI: < 25; 25-29.9; >= 30 kg/m(2)) and two groups (D and E) according to waist circumference (WC: <= 88; > 88 cm), each of 30 subjects. They underwent two DXA examinations with in-between repositioning, according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines for precision estimation. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI were expressed as g/cm(2) and absolute value, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between root-mean-square standard deviation and mean; least significant change percentage (LSC%) as 2.77 x CoV; reproducibility as the complement to 100% LSC. Results BSI increased proportionally to BMI and WC and significantly in group C compared to B and A (p = 0.032 and 0.006, respectively). BSI was significantly higher in E compared to D (p = 0.017), whereas no differences were observed in BMD. Although BSI reproducibility was slightly lower in group C (89%), the differences were not significant between all groups. BMD reproducibility did not significantly differ between all groups. Conclusions BSI reproducibility was significantly lower than that of BMD and decreased proportionally to BMI and WC increase. This reduction of BSI reproducibility was more pronounced in patients with BMI >= 30 and WC > 88, as expected, being BSI a parameter sensible to weight

Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study

Objectives: Bone strain index (BSI) is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived index of bone strength obtained from lumbar densitometric scan. We estimated the reproducibility of BSI in healthy women with different body mass index. Methods: We enrolled postmenopausal women (mean age ± SD: 66 ± 10 years) divided into three groups (A, B and C) according to body mass index (BMI: < 25; 25–29.9; ≥ 30 kg/m2) and two groups (D and E) according to waist circumference (WC: ≤ 88; > 88 cm), each of 30 subjects. They underwent two DXA examinations with in-between repositioning, according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines for precision estimation. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI were expressed as g/cm2 and absolute value, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between root-mean-square standard deviation and mean; least significant change percentage (LSC%) as 2.77 × CoV; reproducibility as the complement to 100% LSC. Results: BSI increased proportionally to BMI and WC and significantly in group C compared to B and A (p = 0.032 and 0.006, respectively). BSI was significantly higher in E compared to D (p = 0.017), whereas no differences were observed in BMD. Although BSI reproducibility was slightly lower in group C (89%), the differences were not significant between all groups. BMD reproducibility did not significantly differ between all groups. Conclusions: BSI reproducibility was significantly lower than that of BMD and decreased proportionally to BMI and WC increase. This reduction of BSI reproducibility was more pronounced in patients with BMI ≥ 30 and WC > 88, as expected, being BSI a parameter sensible to weight

Clinical prognostic factors in advanced epithelioid haemangioendothelioma: a retrospective case series analysis within the Italian Rare Cancers Network

BACKGROUND: This multicentric, retrospective study conducted within the Italian Rare Cancer Network describes clinical features and explores their possible prognostic relevance in patients with advanced epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) started on surveillance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data on adult patients with molecularly confirmed, advanced EHE consecutively referred at five sarcoma reference centres between January 2010 and June 2018, with no evidence of progressive disease (PD) and started on surveillance. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were performed. In the latter, due to the low number of cases and events, penalized likelihood was applied, and variable selection was performed using a random forest model. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included. With a median follow-up of 50.2 months, 51 (76%) patients developed PD and 16 (24%) remained stable. PD at treatment start did not meet RECIST version 1.1 in 15/51 (29%) patients. The 3-year PFS and OS were 25.4% and 71.1%, respectively, in the whole population. Tumour-related pain (TRP) was the most common baseline symptom (32.8%), followed by temperature (20.9%), fatigue (17.9%), and weight loss (16.4%). Baseline TRP (P = 0.0002), development of TRP during follow-up (P = 0.005), baseline temperature (P = 0.002), and development of fatigue during follow-up (P = 0.007) were associated with a significantly worst PFS. An association between baseline TRP (P < 0.0001), development of TRP during follow-up (P = 0.0009), evidence of baseline serosal effusion (P = 0.121), and OS was recorded. CONCLUSION: Because of the poor outcome observed in EHE patients presenting with serosal effusion, TRP, temperature, or serosal effusion, upfront treatment in this subgroup could be considered