A Comparison between Observations and MM5 Simulations of the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer across a Temperature Front

Simulations, made with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University (PSU)–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5), of the response of the marine atmospheric boundary layer (MABL) as air moves over a sharp SST front are compared with observations made during the Frontal Air–Sea Interaction Experiment (FASINEX) in the North Atlantic subtropical convergence zone. The purpose of undertaking these comparisons was to evaluate the performance of MM5 in the vicinity of an SST front and to determine which of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterizations available best represents MABL processes. FASINEX provides an ideal dataset for this work in that it contains detailed measurements for scenarios at the two extremes: wind blowing from warm to cold water normal to a 2°C SST front and the converse, wind blowing from cold to warm water. For the wind blowing from warm to cold water, there is a pronounced modification of the near-surface wind field over the front, in both model results and aircraft observations. The decrease of near-surface wind speed and stress is due to a stable internal boundary layer (IBL) induced by the SST front, restricting exchange of mass and momentum between the surface and upper part of the MABL. For the cold-to-warm case, the relatively strong vertical mixing through the entire MABL over warm water dampens the response of the near-surface winds and surface stress to the SST front. The properties observed by the aircraft are simulated quite well in both cases, suggesting that MM5 captures the appropriate boundary layer physics at the mesoscale or regional scale

Green alliances and the role of taxation

We examine two alternative strategies that an environmental group can embark when interacting with a firm. The first one which is already discussed in the literature is when the group campaigns against the firm. The second one which has not been modelled in the literature is when the group collaborates with the firm (green alliance) to reduce the cost of the cleaner technology. We look at the case of both options being available for the group in a setting with an environmental tax. One of the main results of the paper argues that for higher taxation the conflict scenario is more likely to happen, implying that collaboration and a more stringent environmental policy are substitutes. This identifies a previously unexamined and possibly adverse effect of public policy on environmental quality because it weakens the impact of the pollution tax on emission intensity. We also characterise the optimal tax that maximises social welfare and find that under pure conflict –when conflict is the only option for the environmentalists– optimal tax is higher than when the group can choose to act against or join forces with the firm, indicating that a less stringent environmental policy is needed in the latter scenario