Jalin C. Wesley and Benjamin David Stidham in a Joint Voice Recital

This is the program for the joint senior recital of baritone Jalin C. Wesley and tenor Benjamin David Stidham. Mr. Wesley and Mr. Stidham were accompanied on the piano by Susan Monroe and Phyllis Walker. This recital took place on October 21, 2014, in the McBeth Recital Hall in the Mabee Fine Arts Center

Sources of Sex Information Used by Young British Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW) and Women Who Have Sex Exclusively with Men (WSEM): Evidence from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles

There is little consideration about the provision of information about sex to women who have sex with women (WSW). This study drew on data from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyle, a nationally representative survey of people in Great Britain. Logistic regression was undertaken to examine firstly the relationships between WSW and women who have sex exclusively with men (WSEM) and their main source of information about sex, and secondly between WSW/WSEM and unmet need for information about sex. Each source was included as the binary outcome indicating yes this was the main source, or no this was not the main source of information about sex. The results found that WSW had significantly lower odds of reporting lessons at schools as their main source of information, and significantly higher odds of reporting sources defined as ‘other’ (predominantly first girlfriend/boyfriend or sexual partner) as their main source of information. Reported levels of unmet need for information was also higher amongst young WSW compared with WSEM. This study provides new insights into the sex educational needs of young women and highlights the need for sex education in schools in Great Britain to include information on a full-range of sexual practices, including same-sex sexual relationships

Systematic review with network meta‐analysis: the efficacy of anti‐ TNF agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107372/1/apt12749.pd

Letter: biological drugs for inducing remission in ulcerative colitis – authors' reply

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106897/1/apt12724.pd

Letter: comparative efficacy of biological therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis – authors’ reply

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107370/1/apt12773.pd

Client Participation in Moral Case Deliberation: A Precarious Relational Balance

Moral case deliberation (MCD) is a form of clinical ethics support in which the ethicist as facilitator aims at supporting professionals with a structured moral inquiry into their moral issues from practice. Cases often affect clients, however, their inclusion in MCD is not common. Client participation often raises questions concerning conditions for equal collaboration and good dialogue. Despite these questions, there is little empirical research regarding client participation in clinical ethics support in general and in MCD in particular. This article aims at describing the experiences and processes of two MCD groups with client participation in a mental healthcare institution. A responsive evaluation was conducted examining stakeholders’ issues concerning client participation. Findings demonstrate that participation initially creates uneasiness. As routine builds up and client participants meet certain criteria, both clients and professionals start thinking beyond ‘us-them’ distinctions, and become more equal partners in dialogue. Still, sentiments of distrust and feelings of not being safe may reoccur. Client participation in MCD thus requires continuous reflection and alertness on relational dynamics and the quality of and conditions for dialogue. Participation puts the essentials of MCD (i.e., dialogue) to the test. Yet, the methodology and features of MCD offer an appropriate platform to introduce client participation in healthcare institutions