70 research outputs found

    GAS-PRESSURE BONDING OF ZIRCALOY-CLAD FLAT-PLATE URANIUM DIOXIDE FUEL ELEMENTS

    Get PDF
    A solid-state bonding technique involving the use of gas pressure at elevated temperatures was investigated for the preparation of compartmented Zircaloy-clad flat-plate uranium dioxide fuel elements. These investigations involved development of methods for the surface preparation and assembly of fuel- element components for bonding, determination of optimum bonding parameters, development of barrier coatings for uranium dioxide to prevent reaction with Zircaloy, and extensive testing and evaluation of the bonded fuel elements. During the course of this work, the process was continually modified and refined in an effort to improve the quality of the bonded element and decrease the cost of fabrication. The surface-preparation studies indicated that satisfactory bonding could be obtained consistently with both machined and belt-abraded components. Belt abrasion is more economical and was used as the standard technique in the development phases of the program. Initially the elements were assembled into a stainless steel or Ti-Namel envelope which was evacuated and sealed prior to bonding. Later studies showed that the quality of bonded elements could be improved and process costs decreased by edge welding the Zircaloy components to form a gastight assembly that was then bonded without use of a protective envelope. Further cost reductions were incorporated into the process by the use of piece Zircaloy components to form the picture frame. Optimum bending with a minimum core-to-cladding reaction was achieved by pressure bonding at 1500 to 1550 deg F for 4 hr using a helium gas pressure of 10,000 psi. A postbonding heat treatment for 5 min at 1850 deg F in a salt bath promoted additional grain growth at the bond interface during the alpha-to-beta transformation. Barrier layers of graphite. chronaium, iron. molybdenum, nickel, niobium, palladium, and various oxides were investigated to prevent reaction between the UO/sub 2/ core and Zircaloy cladding. Graphite, in the form of a sprayed and buffed coating, and chromium were found to be relatively effective barriers. The graphite coating was easy to apply and less expensive than a chromium electroplate. (auth

    Microbial contamination of laboratory constructed removable orthodontic appliances

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine whether laboratory constructed removable orthodontic appliances are free from microbial contamination prior to clinical use and to evaluate the dental hospital cross-infection procedures to ensure that patient-derived contamination does not enter the construction process, thereby propagating a cycle of cross-contamination.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The construction process of removable orthodontic appliances from three individuals was evaluated at every stage, from impression to final delivery of the appliance using molecular microbiological techniques. The bacterial profiles at each stage of appliance construction were obtained using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, along with the bacterial profiles of the three participants' saliva. This enabled the bacterial profiles found at each stage of construction to be compared directly with the saliva of the person for whom the appliance was being constructed. Bacteria were identified at each stage using 16S rDNA PCR amplification and sequence phylogeny.RESULTS: There was no evidence of bacterial cross-contamination from patients to the laboratory. The current process of disinfection of impression appears to be adequate. Contamination was found on the final removable appliances (0.97 × 10(2)-1.52 × 10(3) cfu ml(-1)), and this contamination occurred from within the laboratory itself.CONCLUSIONS: Every effort is made to reduce potential cross-infection to patients and dental professionals. Newly constructed removable appliances were shown not to be free from contamination with bacteria prior to clinical use, but this contamination is environmental. Further studies would be required to determine the level of risk this poses to patients.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental professionals have a duty of care to minimise or eradicate potential risks of cross-infection to patients and other members of the team. To date, much less attention has been paid to contamination from the orthodontic laboratory, so contamination and infection risks are unknown.</p
    corecore