Dragging maintaining symmetry: can it generate the concept of inclusivity as well as a family of shapes?

This article describes a project using Design Based Research methodology to ascertain whether a pedagogical task based on a dynamic figure designed in a Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) program could be instrumental in developing students’ geometrical reasoning. A dragging strategy which I have named ‘Dragging Maintaining Symmetry’ (DMS) was shown to be important for the making of mathematical meanings in the context of Dynamic Geometry. In particular, it encouraged students’ development of the concept of inclusive relations between shapes generated from the dynamic figure, especially the rhombus as a special case of the kites. This development was not automatic and in addition to their work with the dynamic figure the students were shown an animation of the figure under DMS. Watching the animation allowed the students to attend to the continuous nature of the changing figure and proved to be the catalyst for moving their reasoning towards perceiving inclusive relations between the rhombus and kite

Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report

This survey on the theme of Geometry Education (including new technologies) focuses chiefly on the time span since 2008. Based on our review of the research literature published during this time span (in refereed journal articles, conference proceedings and edited books), we have jointly identified seven major threads of contributions as these relate to the early years of learning (pre-school and primary school) through to post-compulsory education and to the issue of mathematics teacher education for geometry. These themes are as follows: developments in and trends in the use of theories; advances in the understanding of spatial reasoning; the use and role of diagrams and gestures; advances in the understanding of the role of technologies; advances in the understanding of the teaching and learning of definitions; advances in the understanding of the teaching and learning of the proving process; and, moving beyond traditional Euclidean approaches. Within each theme, we identify relevant research and also offer commentary on future directions