Cyclin D1, cyclin E, and p21 have no apparent prognostic value in anal carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential prognostic and/or predictive value of the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, and p21 protein in a series of 98 anal carcinomas (T1-4, N0-3) treated by radiotherapy with (51) or without (47) chemotherapy in one institution. Correlation with Mib1 index and p53 expression was also investigated. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 124 months (range: 30-266). Immunohistochemical staining was performed on pretreatment biopsies, applying a standard ABC technique for cyclin D1 (clone DSC6, DAKO, 1 : 300), cyclin E (clone 13A3, Novocastra, 1 : 100), p21(WAF/CIP1) (clone SX118, DAKO, 1 : 50), p53 (clone DO7, DAKO, 1 : 200), and Mib1 (Ki-67, Dianova, 1 : 20). Tumours were classified into low- or high-expression groups according to the expression level of the protein considered. High expression was found in 51% of tumours for cyclin E, in 33.7% for cyclin D1, and in 65% for p21. None of those factors were significantly associated with clinical variables such as advanced T or N categories. In a monovariate analysis, advanced T and N categories and longer overall treatment time were the only variables that correlated significantly with low rate of local control (LC) and disease-free survival. However, in a subgroup analysis, high p21 expression correlated with a trend for significantly higher 5-year LC (87 vs 68%, P=0.07) in the N0 patients. The results of this study suggest that the cell-cycle proteins investigated are unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting treatment response or prognosis in patients with anal carcinomas

Sci—Wed PM: Delivery—02: Characterization and Clinical Evaluation of RADPOS 4D in vivo Dosimetry System

A novel 4D in vivo dosimetry system, RADPOS, has recently been developed. The system combines a MOSFET dosimeter with an electromagnetic positioning sensor and is currently used in a clinical trial to determine its potential for application in external beam treatments. The probe is small (1.3 mm diameter) and can be used either on patient skin or inside natural body cavities as a real time treatment verification tool providing immediate feedback about patient motion and the accuracy of the delivered dose. Preliminary tests have shown that the RADPOS has dosimetric characteristics similar to microMOSFET detectors, when the last one is used alone. The system can measure displacements with an accuracy ranging from (1.1–1.3) mm, within a volume defined by the coordinates: [formula omitted], [formula omitted], and [formula omitted], related to the transmitter. The stability of the RADPOS position readout is within 0.21 ± 0.07 mm and is not affected by the linac beam. The clinical trial involves lung cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy. Four RADPOS detectors are positioned at marked points on the patients' abdomen and chest during an initial 4DCT and subsequent treatment fractions. Position coordinates of the sensors are read in real time and compared to determine deviation from initial breathing patterns measured during the 4DCT. Total dose is read at the end of each fraction. Initial clinical results show that the RADPOS system can measure the amplitude and period of the patients breathing pattern and can provide a means to identify corresponding changes in dose

The value of pretreatment cell kinetic parameters as predictors for radiotherapy outcome in head and neck cancer : a multicenter analysis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the potential of pre-treatment cell kinetic parameters to predict outcome in head and neck cancer patients treated by conventional radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Data from 11 different centers were pooled. Inclusion criteria were such that the patients received radiotherapy alone, and that the radiotherapy was given in an overall time of at least 6 weeks with a dose of at least 60 Gy. All patients received a tracer dose of either iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) or bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) intravenously prior to treatment and a tumor biopsy was taken several hours later. The cell kinetic parameters labeling index (LI), DNA synthesis time (Ts) and potential doubling time (Tpot) were subsequently calculated from flow cytometry data, obtained on the biopsies using antibodies against I/BrdUrd incorporated into DNA. Each center carried out their own flow cytometry analysis. Results: From the 11 centers, a total of 476 patients conforming to the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Median values for overall time and total dose were 49 days and 69 Gy, respectively. Fifty one percent of patients had local recurrences and 53% patients had died, the majority from their disease. Median follow-up was 20 months; being 30 months for surviving patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that T-stage, maximum tumor diameter, differentiation grade, N-stage, tumor localization and overall time correlated with locoregional control, in decreasing order of significance. For the cell kinetic parameters, univariate analysis showed that only LI was significantly associated with local control (P=0.02), with higher values correlating with a worse outcome. Ts showed some evidence that patients with longer values did worse, but this was not significant (P=0.06). Tpot showed no trend (P=0.8). When assessing survival in a univariate analysis, neither LI nor Tpot associated with outcome (P=0.4, 0.4, respectively). Surprisingly, Ts did correlate with survival, with longer values being worse (P=0.02). In the multivariate analysis of local control, LI lost its significance (P=0.16). Conclusions: The only pretreatment kinetic parameter for which some evidence was found for an association with local control (the best end-point for testing the present hypothesis) was LI, not Tpot, and this evidence disappeared in a multivariate analysis. It therefore appears that pretreatment cell kinetic measurements carried out using flow cytometry, only provide a relatively weak predictor of outcome after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.NCI T92-004