Effects of Removal and Remixing of Heavyweight Pigs on Performance to Slaughter Weights

An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of heavyweight pig removal and remixing on performance. The experiment used a total of 450 pigs (31 kg initial BW) that were sorted and remixed at a mean replicate BW of 73 kg. Treatments were 15 pigs/pen from initial BW to slaughter (15S), 20 pigs/pen from initial BW to time of sort and remix, then reduced to 15 pigs/pen (20/ 15), and 15 pigs/pen from time of sort and remix to slaughter, comprised of the 5 heaviest pigs from each of three 20/15 pens per replicate (15M). Space allocation was 0.56 m2/pig to the day of remixing and 0.74 m2/pig thereafter. There was no effect (P \u3e 0.1) of treatment on ADG before 73 kg BW when pens were 1A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, Lincoln, NE 68583. Journal series no. 14679. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] 3Committee members during the study in addition to those listed above were G. Apgar, SIU; M. Carlson, MO; R. K. Christenson, USDA-ARS RLH USMARC; L. Christianson, IL; M. Ellis, IL; R. Goodband, KSU; J. D. Harmon, IA; M. Honeyman, IA; D. D. Jones, IN; S. J. Moeller, OH; B. Richert, IN; K. Stalder, TN; R. C. Thaler, SD. the experimental units. There was no effect (P \u3e 0.1) of treatment on ADG or feed conversion to slaughter BW following removal and remixing using the contrast 20/15 + 15M vs. 15S. The average of the replicate for 20/15 and 15M was used as the experimental unit in a second statistical analysis. Daily feed was less (P = 0.079) from placement to 73 kg BW for the 20/15 + 15M population vs. the 15S population resulting in a lesser (P = 0.067) overall ADG (0.875 vs. 0.887 kg/d, respectively) with no effect (P \u3e 0.1) on feed conversion or CV sample population BW. Removal and remixing of heavyweight pigs at a midpoint in the growth process had minimal effects on performance to slaughter and CV for BW at slaughter

NF93-113 Proper Way to Ear Notch Pigs

This NebFact offers instruction in pig ear notching

Effect of Source of Pig, Housing System, and Receiving Diet on Performance of Purchased Feeder Pigs

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of source of pig, housing system and receiving diet on performance of purchased feeder pigs. Pigs purchased from distant auction markets (DM) gained slower for the first 13 d post-arrival (P\u3c.01, trials 1 and 2) than pigs of similar size purchased from local, one-owner sources (LS)

Effect of Wean-to-Finish Management on Pig Performance

An experiment consisting of three trials was conducted to determine the effect of wean-to-finish management systems on pig performance. Treatments consisted of: 1) wean-to-finish single stock (WF) at 7.5 ft2/pig from weaning (17 day mean age) to slaughter in a fully slatted finishing facility; 2) double stock (DS) at 3.75 ft2/pig for eight weeks following weaning and then split into two pens at 7.5 ft2/pig each; and 3) nursery (NF) at 3.75 ft2/ pig for eight weeks in a conventional nursery followed by movement to the finisher and stocked at 7.5 ft2/pig to slaughter. All pens had one two-hole wean-finish dry feeder per 15 pigs and one cup-drinker per 15 pigs. While there were health related performance problems in Trials 1 and 2 due to PRRS, there were no trial by treatment interactions. At the end of eight weeks, WF pigs were heavier (P\u3c.01) than DS pigs with NF pigs intermediate in weight (63.1, 59.2, and 60.9 lbs, respectively). The heavier weight was due to a difference (P\u3c.01) in feed intake between the WF and DS treatments. There was no effect of nursery phase treatment on feed efficiency. There was no effect (P\u3e.1) of any management treatment on any grow-finish phase production parameter reported. These data suggest that the performance improvement associated with wean–to-finish production systems occurs during the first eight weeks post-weaning. They also suggest that the response can be expected even when health challenges occur in a production system