The Frail Constitution Of Good Intentions

If I understand the architecture of Professor Miller\u27s argument correctly, his lofty conclusion rests on two pillars, either of which he regards as adequate to support it; these pillars in turn arise from a single foundational premise

Book Review: American Constitutional Law. (2d Ed.). by Laurence M. Tribe.

Book review: American Constitutional Law. (2d ed.). By Laurence M. Tribe. Mineola, New York: Foundation Press. 1988. P.p. 1778. Reviewed by: Stanley C Brubaker

Book Review: The Authoritative and the Authoritarian. by Joseph Vining.

Book review: The Authoritative and the Authoritarian. By Joseph Vining. Chicago, 11.: University of Chicago Press. 1986. Pp. XX, 268. Reviewed by: Stanley C. Brubaker

Book Review: on What the Constitution Means. by Sotirios Barber.

Book review: On What the Constitution Means. By Sotirios Barber. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1984. Pp. viii, 245. Reviewed by Stanley C Brubaker

Book Review: American Constitutional Law. (2d Ed.). by Laurence M. Tribe.

Book review: American Constitutional Law. (2d ed.). By Laurence M. Tribe. Mineola, New York: Foundation Press. 1988. P.p. 1778. Reviewed by: Stanley C Brubaker

Book Review: on What the Constitution Means. by Sotirios Barber.

Book review: On What the Constitution Means. By Sotirios Barber. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1984. Pp. viii, 245. Reviewed by Stanley C Brubaker