Organic in Europe: Prospects and Developments

In 2016/2017 the European organic food and farming sector continued to excel both in terms of organic production and market growth as well as the latest developments in European Union (EU) food and farming policy. Data for 2016 shows the European organic food market recording significant growth – increasing by 11.4 percent (EU: 12.0 percent). At the same time, the organic sector faces a number of challenges, notably that the growth rates in organic production continue to lag behind the dynamic growth seen within the organic food market. In the public policy arena at the EU level, there are some opportunities for the organic sector to capitalise on the growing awareness and interest in tackling sustainability concerns in the agri-food sector amongst policymakers, but there are also challenges. These prospects and developments for organic in Europe are explored in this chapter

Organic in Europe: Recent Developments

In 2017, the European organic food and farming sector continued to excel both in terms of organic production and market growth. Data for 2017 (for full data see page 216) shows the European organic food market recording significant growth – increasing by more than ten percent to 37.3 billion. At the same time, the organic sector faces a number of challenges, notably that the growth rates in organic area, in spite of recent stronger growth, continues to lag behind the dynamic growth seen within the organic food market (Figure 68). A major milestone in 2018 was the publication of the new European Union rules on organic production and labelling of organic products in May, and in June 2018, the European Commission launched its proposal for the Common Agricultural Policy for the period 2021 to 2027

Policy brief on the organic approach to inputs – Plant protection products, fertilisers, veterinary drugs and feed additives explained

The plant and animal health care strategy in organic farming strengthensagro-biodiversity, protects the environment as well as animal and human health. In addition to fully exploiting preventive options, the use of external inputs such as plant protection products, fertilisers or veterinarymedicinal productsis allowed to prevent inacceptable losses in productivity or animal suffering. However, external inputs need to comply with organic standardsas well as European legislationand aretherefore carefully evaluated before any decision on acceptance is taken.Organic farming systems should aim at reducing dependency on off-farm fertilisers to the lowest feasable level to ensure closed nutrient cycles and avoid nutrient leakage and contamination. This policy brief explains the underlying principles and the procedures for evaluation of inputs, focusing on plant protection products, fertilisers, feed additives and veterinary medicinal products used in organic farming under European legislation. The case study in Annex I on plant protection products provides a full picture on the processes and criteria for authorisation, the assessment of new inputs accordingtothe suitability in organic farming, the history of utilised substances and possible trade-offs and concerns

Progression-Free Survival Early Assessment Is a Robust Surrogate Endpoint of Overall Survival in Immunotherapy Trials of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Radiology-based outcomes, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), are used as surrogate endpoints in oncology trials. We aimed to assess the surrogacy relationship of PFS with overall survival (OS) in clinical trials of systemic therapies targeting advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by novel meta-regression methods. Methods: A search of databases (PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Meeting Libraries, Clinicaltrials.gov) for trials of systemic therapies for advanced HCC reporting both OS and PFS was performed. Individual patient data were extracted from PFS and OS Kaplan–Meier curves. Summary median PFS and OS data were obtained from random-effect model. The surrogate relationships of median PFS, first quartile (Q1), third quartile (Q3), and restricted mean survival time (RMST) for OS were evaluated by the coefficient of determination R2. Heterogeneity was explored by meta-regression. Results: We identified 49 trials, 11 assessing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and 38 multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Overall, the correlation between median PFS and median OS was weak (R2 = 0.20. 95% Confidence Intervals [CI]-0.02;0.42). Surrogacy robustness varied between treatment classes and PFS endpoints. In ICI trials only, the correlations between Q1-PFS and Q1-OS and between 12-month PFS-RMST and 12-month OS-RMST were high (R2 = 0.89, 95%CI 0.78–0.98, and 0.80, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, respectively). Interaction p-values obtained by meta-regression confirmed the robustness of results. Conclusions: In trials of systemic therapies for advanced HCC, the surrogate relationship of PFS with OS is highly variable depending on treatment class (ICI or MKI) and evaluation time-point. In ICI trials, Q1-PFS and 12-month PFS-RMST are robust surrogate endpoints for OS

Si photomultipliers for bio-sensing applications

In this paper, silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) are proposed as optical detectors for bio sensing. Optical transduction is the most used detection mechanism in many biosensor applications, such as DNA microarray and real-time polymerase chain reaction. The performances of a 25 pixels device used for both applications are studied. The results confirm that the SiPM is more sensitive than the traditionally employed detectors. In fact, it is able to experimentally detect 1 nM and 100 fM of fluorophore concentrations in dried samples and solutions, respectively. We present and discuss in details the detector configuration and its characterization as fluorescence detector for bio sensing

Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma with a 3-months interval in “extremely high-risk” patients does not further improve survival

Background An enhanced surveillance schedule has been proposed for cirrhotics with viral etiology, who are considered at extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Aims We compared the 3- and 6-months surveillance interval, evaluating cancer stage at diagnosis and patient survival. Methods Data of 777 HBV and HCV cirrhotic patients with HCC diagnosed under a 3-months (n = 109, 3MS group) or a 6-months (n = 668, 6MS group) surveillance were retrieved from the Italian Liver Cancer database. Survival in the 3MS group was considered as observed and adjusted for lead-time bias, and survival analysis was repeated after a propensity score matching. Results The 3-months surveillance interval neither reduced the share of patients diagnosed outside the Milano criteria, nor increased their probability to receive curative treatments. The median survival of 6MS patients (55.0 months [45.9–64.0]) was not significantly different from the observed (47.0 months [35.0–58.9]; p = 0.43) and adjusted (44.9 months [33.4–56.4]; p = 0.30) survival of 3MS patients. A propensity score analysis confirmed the absence of a survival advantage for 3MS patients. Conclusions A tightening of surveillance schedule does not increase the diagnosis of early-stage tumors, the feasibility of curative treatments and the survival. Therefore, we should maintain the 6-months interval in the surveillance of viral cirrhotics

Monofocal hepatocellular carcinoma: how much does size matter?

none88mixedPelizzaro, Filippo; Penzo, Barbara; Peserico, Giulia; Imondi, Angela; Sartori, Anna; Vitale, Alessandro; Cillo, Umberto; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Forgione, Antonella; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Di Marco, Maria; Caturelli, Eugenio; Zoli, Marco; Sacco, Rodolfo; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Marra, Fabio; Mega, Andrea; Morisco, Filomena; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Svegliati‐Baroni, Gianluca; Foschi, Francesco Giuseppe; Olivani, Andrea; Masotto, Alberto; Nardone, Gerardo; Raimondo, Giovanni; Azzaroli, Francesco; Vidili, Gianpaolo; Oliveri, Filippo; Trevisani, Franco; Farinati, Fabio; Biselli, Maurizio; Caraceni, Paolo; Garuti, Francesca; Gramenzi, Annagiulia; Neri, Andrea; Santi, Valentina; Granito, Alessandro; Muratori, Luca; Piscaglia, Fabio; Sansone, Vito; Tovoli, Francesco; Dajti, Elton; Marasco, Giovanni; Ravaioli, Federico; Cappelli, Alberta; Golfieri, Rita; Mosconi, Cristina; Renzulli, Matteo; Marina Cela, Ester; Facciorusso, Antonio; Cacciato, Valentina; Casagrande, Edoardo; Moscatelli, Alessandro; Pellegatta, Gaia; de Matthaeis, Nicoletta; Allegrini, Gloria; Lauria, Valentina; Ghittoni, Giorgia; Pelecca, Giorgio; Chegai, Fabrizio; Coratella, Fabio; Ortenzi, Mariano; Missale, Gabriele; Inno, Alessandro; Marchetti, Fabiana; Busacca, Anita; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Cammà, Calogero; Di Martino, Vincenzo; Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Giacomo; Stella Franzè, Maria; Saitta, Carlo; Sauchella, Assunta; Bevilacqua, Vittoria; Borghi, Alberto; Casadei Gardini, Andrea; Conti, Fabio; Chiara Dall’Aglio, Anna; Ercolani, Giorgio; Mirici, Federica; Campani, Claudia; Di Bonaventura, Chiara; Gitto, Stefano; Coccoli, Pietro; Malerba, Antonio; Guarino, Maria; Brunetto, Maurizia; Romagnoli, VeronicaPelizzaro, Filippo; Penzo, Barbara; Peserico, Giulia; Imondi, Angela; Sartori, Anna; Vitale, Alessandro; Cillo, Umberto; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Forgione, Antonella; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Di Marco, Maria; Caturelli, Eugenio; Zoli, Marco; Sacco, Rodolfo; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Marra, Fabio; Mega, Andrea; Morisco, Filomena; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Svegliati‐baroni, Gianluca; Foschi, Francesco Giuseppe; Olivani, Andrea; Masotto, Alberto; Nardone, Gerardo; Raimondo, Giovanni; Azzaroli, Francesco; Vidili, Gianpaolo; Oliveri, Filippo; Trevisani, Franco; Farinati, Fabio; Biselli, Maurizio; Caraceni, Paolo; Garuti, Francesca; Gramenzi, Annagiulia; Neri, Andrea; Santi, Valentina; Granito, Alessandro; Muratori, Luca; Piscaglia, Fabio; Sansone, Vito; Tovoli, Francesco; Dajti, Elton; Marasco, Giovanni; Ravaioli, Federico; Cappelli, Alberta; Golfieri, Rita; Mosconi, Cristina; Renzulli, Matteo; Marina Cela, Ester; Facciorusso, Antonio; Cacciato, Valentina; Casagrande, Edoardo; Moscatelli, Alessandro; Pellegatta, Gaia; de Matthaeis, Nicoletta; Allegrini, Gloria; Lauria, Valentina; Ghittoni, Giorgia; Pelecca, Giorgio; Chegai, Fabrizio; Coratella, Fabio; Ortenzi, Mariano; Missale, Gabriele; Inno, Alessandro; Marchetti, Fabiana; Busacca, Anita; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Cammà, Calogero; Di Martino, Vincenzo; Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Giacomo; Stella Franzè, Maria; Saitta, Carlo; Sauchella, Assunta; Bevilacqua, Vittoria; Borghi, Alberto; Casadei Gardini, Andrea; Conti, Fabio; Chiara Dall’Aglio, Anna; Ercolani, Giorgio; Mirici, Federica; Campani, Claudia; Di Bonaventura, Chiara; Gitto, Stefano; Coccoli, Pietro; Malerba, Antonio; Guarino, Maria; Brunetto, Maurizia; Romagnoli, Veronic