Language spoken at home and the association between ethnicity and doctor-patient communication in primary care: analysis of survey data for South Asian and White British patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if language spoken at home mediates the relationship between ethnicity and doctor-patient communication for South Asian and White British patients. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of patient experience survey data collected from 5870 patients across 25 English general practices. Mixed effect linear regression estimated the difference in composite general practitioner-patient communication scores between White British and South Asian patients, controlling for practice, patient demographics and patient language. RESULTS: There was strong evidence of an association between doctor-patient communication scores and ethnicity. South Asian patients reported scores averaging 3.0 percentage points lower (scale of 0-100) than White British patients (95% CI -4.9 to -1.1, p=0.002). This difference reduced to 1.4 points (95% CI -3.1 to 0.4) after accounting for speaking a non-English language at home; respondents who spoke a non-English language at home reported lower scores than English-speakers (adjusted difference 3.3 points, 95% CI -6.4 to -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: South Asian patients rate communication lower than White British patients within the same practices and with similar demographics. Our analysis further shows that this disparity is largely mediated by language.The work was conducted as part of an MPhil course, and involved secondary analysis of survey data designed and collected by a collaboration between the Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research at the University of Cambridge and the University of Exeter Medical School. KB was not employed by the University of Cambridge, nor did she receive any funding at any time during the project. GA and JB were funded for the original NIHR grant which funded the original survey but received no funding for this specific work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The survey on which this secondary analysis was based was funded by a National Institute for Health Research Programme Grant for Applied Research (NIHR PGfAR) programme (RP-PG-0608-10050). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from BMJ Group via http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-01004

Moyo Vol. VIII N 2

Durica, Paul. Editor\u27s Letter . 4. Fisher, Dan. Heaven for Thunder (Thoughts on the Last Execution) . 5. Anshuman, Karan. Return to Sender (Mail-Order Brides Log-On Love) . 6. Grindstaff, Michelle. Madonna or Whore (Language Traps Female Sexuality) . 7. Thackeray, Alex. Strike Against the Right (Canada Collegians Take Action) . 8. Dotson, Dorothy. Tori Listening to Mullet Boy . 10. Stine, Alison. Tori Story (Secrets of a Toriphile: Good Girl Gets Plugged) . 11. Barret, Laura. Late Night Crush (Girl Crazy for Conan) . 15. Hankinson, Tom. Environmentally friendly, or Else (DURP tough on DU Junk) . 16. Bussan, David. Fantasy\u27s Island (Alums Find Paradise in Northern Cyprus) . 18. Burt, Kara. Innocents on Break (Students Exercise Alternatives in New York) . 21. Werne, Kirsten. Two Turntables and a Ten-Gallon Hat . 23. Million, Chris. Friendship a Modem Away, Sigh (AOL Alters Denison Social Scene) . 34

Moyo Vol. VIII N 1

Durica, Paul Editor\u27s Letter . 4. Thackeray, Alex. Postcard from the sXe . 5. Ward, Luc. Gods & Monsters (Hook-Up at Church) . 6. Anshuman, Karan. The India Nobody Knows (Mysticism and Misconceptions Revealed) . 8. Clements, Nina and Betsy Falconer. God as One of Us: Diverse Faiths Thrive at Denison . 10. Million, Chris. Splendor in the Fall (First Year Love Bittersweet) . 16. Grindstaff, Michelle. Beer by Night, Bed by Morning . 17. Hart, Madeline and Meredith Newman. Smoke Alarm: Reading This may Cause Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and Complicate Pregnancy . 21. Almirall, Sara and Kirsten Werne. 20 Best Spots to Smoke on Campus . 22. Werne, Kirsten. An Interview with Painted Thin . 23. Burt, Kara. All in All, We\u27re Just Paper o the Wall (Dorm Art Clue to Denison Identity) . 25. Levine, Robert. Less Talk, Moore Rock (Thurston\u27 Sound Uplifts Soul) . 30. Almirall, R.R. Turtles . 31. Almirall, RR. The Warthog Feels He Has Much in Common With Paul Newman, Others Don\u27t . 20

Constraints on the χ_(c1) versus χ_(c2) polarizations in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV

The polarizations of promptly produced χ_(c1) and χ_(c2) mesons are studied using data collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC, in proton-proton collisions at √s=8  TeV. The χ_c states are reconstructed via their radiative decays χ_c → J/ψγ, with the photons being measured through conversions to e⁺e⁻, which allows the two states to be well resolved. The polarizations are measured in the helicity frame, through the analysis of the χ_(c2) to χ_(c1) yield ratio as a function of the polar or azimuthal angle of the positive muon emitted in the J/ψ → μ⁺μ⁻ decay, in three bins of J/ψ transverse momentum. While no differences are seen between the two states in terms of azimuthal decay angle distributions, they are observed to have significantly different polar anisotropies. The measurement favors a scenario where at least one of the two states is strongly polarized along the helicity quantization axis, in agreement with nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics predictions. This is the first measurement of significantly polarized quarkonia produced at high transverse momentum