6 research outputs found

    āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ”āļąāļŠāļ™āļĩāļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‚āļēāļĒ

    Get PDF
    āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ”āļąāļŠāļ™āļĩāļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‚āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ§āļąāļ™āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđƒāļ™āļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ„āļ—āļĒ āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ”āļąāļŠāļ™āļĩāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ āļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļ™āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āđƒāļ” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ”āļąāļŠāļ™āļĩāļˆāļēāļ 8 āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļāļĐāļ•āļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ­āļēāļŦāļēāļĢ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļīāļ™āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ­āļļāļ›āđ‚āļ āļ„āļšāļĢāļīāđ‚āļ āļ„ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļīāļ™āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ­āļŠāļąāļ‡āļŦāļēāļĢāļīāļĄāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļāđˆāļ­āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāļēāļāļĢ āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩ āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļŦāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™ āļ„āļģāļ™āļ§āļ“āđ‚āļ”āļĒ 2 āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ„āļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ„āđˆāļēāļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļœāļĨāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē 30 āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩ āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļŠāđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļšāđˆāļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ”āļąāļŠāļ™āļĩāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āđāļĨāļ° āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļˆāļēāļāđāļšāļšāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡ Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ§āļąāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ 22 āļžāļĪāļĐāļ āļēāļ„āļĄ āļž.āļĻ. 2558 āļ–āļķāļ‡ 29 āļ˜āļąāļ™āļ§āļēāļ„āļĄ āļž.āļĻ. 2560 āđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļšāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 2 āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē  āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļŠāđ‰āļē (10.00 āļ™. – 12.30 āļ™.) āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļšāđˆāļēāļĒ (14.30 āļ™. – 16.30 āļ™.) āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ–āļđāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ­āļŠāļąāļ‡āļŦāļēāļĢāļīāļĄāļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāđ€āļŠāđ‰āļēāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļˆāļēāļāđāļšāļšāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡ GARCH āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āđ‰āļ™ āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļąāļ™āļœāļ§āļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ•āļŠāļēāļŦāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļāļąāļšāļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāđāļ•āđˆāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļāļąāļšāļ•āļąāļ§āđāļ›āļĢāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļļāļĄāļ­āļ·āđˆāļ™āđ† āđāļ—

    Enhancing Organizational Resilience through Mindful Organizing

    No full text
    Organizational resilience and mindfulness are inextricably connected and have specific characteristics related to responding to challenging events. This mixed-method research study aimed to explore the relationship between mindful organizing and organizational resilience. A qualitative critical incident analysis was conducted with executives to explore insights into mindfulness and resilience at the organizational level. Using the analysis of a moment structures (AMOS) program, the structural equation modeling method was employed to assess the relationships between mindfulness, mindful organizing, and organizational resilience. A total of 639 usable cross-sectional questionnaires from diverse organizations in Thailand were used for data analysis. The findings of the current study reveal that mindful organizing has a positive influence on organizational resilience. This paper discusses the implications and limitations of these findings, along with suggestions for future research

    Enhancing employee resilience through Eastern spirituality and Western scientific mindfulness

    No full text
    Employee resilience is closely linked to well-being, happiness, and workplace performance. Many studies have suggested a connection between mindfulness and employee resilience. However, a notable distinction arises between Eastern spiritual mindfulness and Western scientific mindfulness, prompting an investigation into the specific elements of each perspective that contribute to supporting employee resilience. This study aims to clarify whether Eastern mindfulness, characterized by awareness and attention, or Western mindfulness, characterized by qualities like novelty seeking, novelty producing, and engagement, exerts a more apparent influence on enhancing employee resilience. Furthermore, it seeks to explore any correlation between Eastern spiritual mindfulness and Western scientific mindfulness. This research employs a mixed-method approach utilizing critical incident analysis to gain profound insights of mindfulness perspectives. Furthermore, it applies structural equation modeling to rigorously examine the relationship between mindfulness and employee resilience. The findings reveal a positive association between Eastern and Western mindfulness. Surprisingly, while Eastern mindfulness does not directly impact on employee resilience positively, Western mindfulness demonstrates a favorable effect on employee resilience. Moreover, Western mindfulness emerges as a mediator in the relationship between Eastern mindfulness and employee resilience. This study contributes to both theoretical and practical realm of knowledge. Additionally, it acknowledges its limitations and offers recommendations for future research
    corecore