29 research outputs found
Risk Factors of Voiding Dysfunction and Patient Satisfaction After Tension-free Vaginal Tape Procedure
This study was undertaken to identify risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction and factors having impact on patient global satisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Two hundred and eighty-five women who underwent the TVT procedure for stress urinary incontinence were analyzed to identify risk factors predictive of voiding dysfunction. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as a peak urinary flow rate (PFR) <10 mL/sec (straining voiding, n=17) or residual urine volume >30% of bladder capacity (incomplete emptying, n=13). The global satisfaction rate was 91.6%. Voiding dysfunction developed in 29 (10.2%) patients. Among the factors, PFR was only factor of significance for voiding dysfunction. There was no significant difference between patients with and without voiding dysfunction in terms of their satisfaction. But postoperative PFR <10 mL/sec significantly compromised global satisfaction after the surgery. In those patients with a preoperative PFR <20 mL/sec, there were more patients with postoperative PFR <10 mL/sec. Peak urinary flow rate is an important factor for the postoperative voiding dysfunction. The inevitable decline in PFR can compromise patients' satisfaction with the procedure, when their postoperative PFR was <10 mL/sec
Paradoxical Air Embolism during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Case Report
Air embolism is a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patent foramen ovale, which is necessary in fetal circulation, is a potential route for emboli arising from the venous system to enter the systemic arterial circulation, resulting in paradoxical air embolism syndrome. A case of paradoxical air embolism during percutaneous nephrolithotomy is presented. To our knowledge, this is the first report of paradoxical air embolism associated with patent foramen ovale during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Iliac Stent-Graft Placement for Treatment of a Cutting Balloon–Induced Ureteroiliac Vein Fistula
Clinical Factors Associated With Dose Escalation of Solifenacin for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Real Life Practice
PurposeTo determine the baseline clinical characteristics associated with dose escalation of solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).MethodsWe analyzed the data of patients with OAB (micturition frequency ≥8/day and urgency ≥1/day) who were treated with solifenacin and followed up for 24 weeks. According to our department protocol, all the patients kept voiding diaries, and OAB symptom scores (OABSS) were monitored at baseline and after 4, 12, and 24 weeks of solifenacin treatment.ResultsIn total, 68 patients (mean age, 60.8±10.0 years) were recruited. The dose escalation rate by the end of the study was 41.2%, from 23.5% at 4 weeks and 17.6% at 12 weeks. At baseline, the dose escalator group had significantly more OAB wet patients (53.6% vs. 20.0%) and higher total OABSS (10.2±2.4 vs. 7.9±3.5, P=0.032) than the nonescalator group. OAB wet (odds ratio [OR], 4.615; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.578-13.499; P<0.05) and total OABSS (OR, 1.398; 95% CI, 1.046-1.869; P<0.05) were found to be independently associated with dose escalation.ConclusionsPatients who have urgency urinary incontinence and high total OABSS have a tendency for dose escalation of solifenacin
Effect of decreased renal function on poor oncological outcome after radical cystectomy
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of preoperative renal impairment on the oncological outcomes of patients with urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy from 2004 to 2017. All patients who underwent preoperative 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renal scintigraphy (DTPA) were identified. We divided the patients into two groups according to their glomerular filtration rates (GFRs): GFR group 1, GFR≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2; GFR group 2, 60≤GFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m2. We included 89 patients in GFR group 1 and 246 patients in GFR group 2 and compared the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes between the two groups.
Results: The mean time required for recurrence was 125.5±8.0 months in GFR group 1 and 85.7±7.4 months in GFR group 2 (p=0.030). The mean cancer-specific survival was 131.7±7.8 months in GFR group 1 and 95.5±6.9 months in GFR group 2 (p=0.051). The mean overall survival was 123.3±8.1 months in GFR group 1 and 79.5±6.6 months in GFR group 2 (p=0.004).
Conclusions: Preoperative GFR values in the range of 60≤GFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m2 are independent prognostic factors for poor recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival in patients after radical cystectomy compared with GFR values of ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2
Effectiveness of Noncontrast Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Residual Stones after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
No difference in follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate between hypertensive and matched nonhypertensive kidney donors
Background: According to current guidelines, kidney donor candidates with controlled hypertension using 1 or 2 antihypertensive drugs may be considered as donor. However, this recommendation is based on the study that antihypertensive drug was initiated in mainly “after donor registration” and this may be white-coat hypertension because of donation-related anxiety. We compared the follow-up eGFR between kidney donors with preexisting hypertension and matched nonhypertensive donors. Methods: This single-center retrospective study classified 97 living hypertensive donors previously receiving antihypertensive drugs into two groups: 1 drug group (61 donors) and 2 drugs group (36 donors). We compared the follow-up eGFR between each donor previously receiving antihypertensive drugs and three matched nonhypertensive donors in terms of age, sex, and follow-up duration. Results: At a mean (range) of 51 months (12–214) in the 1 drug group, and 54 months (12–175) in the 2 drugs group after donation, there was no significant difference in follow-up eGFR between hypertensive donors previously receiving antihypertensive drugs and matched controls in each group and in total donors. There was no difference in the incidence of the patients with follow-up eGFR < 45 mL/min/m2 in each group and their matched controls. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that baseline eGFR was the only independent predictor for the final follow-up eGFR in the total donors. Conclusion: Our results support the current guidelines that donor candidates with controlled hypertension using 1 or 2 antihypertensive drugs may be considered as donors, and may increase the strength of this recommendation. Resumen: Antecedentes: Según las guías actuales, los candidatos a donantes con hipertensión controlada que utilicen 1 o 2 antihipertensivos pueden considerarse donantes. Sin embargo, esta recomendación se basa en el estudio en el que el fármaco antihipertensivo se inició principalmente «después del registro del donante» y esto puede ser hipertensión de bata blanca debido a la ansiedad relacionada con la donación. Comparamos la TFGe de seguimiento entre donantes de riñón con hipertensión preexistente y donantes no hipertensos compatibles. Métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro clasificó a 97 donantes hipertensos vivos que recibieron previamente fármacos antihipertensivos en dos grupos: 1 grupo de fármacos (61 donantes) y 2 grupos de fármacos (36 donantes). Comparamos la TFGe de seguimiento entre cada donante que recibió previamente fármacos antihipertensivos y tres donantes no hipertensivos compatibles en términos de edad, sexo y duración del seguimiento. Resultados: A una media (rango) de 51 meses (12-214) en el grupo de un fármaco y 54 meses (12-175) en el grupo de 2 fármacos después de la donación, No hubo diferencias significativas en la TFGe de seguimiento entre los donantes hipertensos que recibieron previamente fármacos antihipertensivos y los controles emparejados en cada grupo y en el total de donantes. No hubo diferencia en el número de pacientes con TFGe de seguimiento < 45 ml/min/m2 en cada grupo y sus controles emparejados. El análisis de regresión lineal múltiple mostró que la TFGe basal fue el único factor de riesgo independiente para la TFGe de seguimiento final en el total de donantes. Conclusión: Nuestros resultados apoyan las directrices actuales de que los candidatos a donantes con hipertensión controlada que utilizan 1 o 2 fármacos antihipertensivos pueden considerarse donantes y pueden aumentar la fuerza de esta recomendación