2 research outputs found
Prediction of the Crystal Morphology of β‑HMX using a Generalized Interfacial Structure Analysis Model
At
sufficiently low supersaturations such that the spiral growth
mechanism dominates, β-cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine (HMX)
grows from acetone into a polyhedron surrounded mainly by the (020)
and (011) faces. In order to elucidate the morphology, a generalized
form of the interfacial structure analysis model is suggested. In
this method, the molecular order parameters of crystals are defined
to identify the orientation and conformation of the adsorbed growth
unit at the interface. This presents a robust method to calculate
the orientational and conformational free energy surfaces that are
utilized for the spiral growth model of centrosymmetric growth units
with polygonal spiral edges. From the metadynamics simulation using
these order parameters as collective variables, the free energy surfaces
with respect to the collective variables revealed that high conformational
free energy of the chair conformation discouraged preordering of the
growth units into crystal-like orientation and conformation. The resulting
morphology was consistent with the previous experimental and theoretical
results, indicating that the anisotropic local concentrations of the
growth units at the interface play a critical role in the different
relative growth rates of the slow-growing faces
Interfacial Structure Analysis for the Morphology Prediction of Adipic Acid Crystals from Aqueous Solution
Adipic
acid crystals grown from aqueous solutions have a hexagonal
plate morphology with a dominant (100) face, where the hydrogen-bonding
carboxylic acid groups are exposed. In the present work, the crystal
morphology was investigated by interfacial structure analysis to obtain
the relative growth rates for the spiral growth model. The concentration
of effective growth units at the interface was found to be the key
external habit-controlling factor by molecular dynamics simulations
at the crystal–solution interface. The differences between
the experimentally observed faces of (002), (100), and (011) and unobserved
faces of (111Ì…), (102Ì…), and (202Ì…) were explained
by two concepts from the interfacial structure analysis that determine
the concentration of the effective growth units. The observed faces
were characterized by larger values of both the surface scaling factor
and molecular orientation factor, implying low anisotropic local concentrations
at the interface and high free energy barriers for reorientation on
these faces, respectively. Furthermore, the number of turns and the
length of one complete spiral rotation and the number of unsaturated
bonds were incorporated into the original approach. This consideration
of the spiral geometry resulted in a close resemblance to the experimental
morphology