4 research outputs found

    Comparison of Anti-müllerian Hormone (AMH) and Hormonal Assays for Phenotypic Classification of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    Get PDF
    Objectives: The aim is to compare the hormonal status and anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels of patients who have different polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes, polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) and healthy women. Material and methods: A total of 350 PCOS women, 71 women with PCOM and 79 healthy women with normal ovarian morphology (NOM) were observed. PCOS patients were divided into groups according to the phenotypes. Phenotype A- characterized by anovulation, hyperandrogenism and PCOM; phenotype B- defined as anovulation, hyperandrogenism; Phenotype C- identified as hyperandrogenism and PCOM; Phenotype D- outlined as anovulation and PCOM. AMH levels were compared for each group. Results: Among 350 PCOS patients the highest number belonged to phenotype A (n = 117, 33.4%). The rest were distrubuted as follows: phenotype B (n = 89, 25.4%), phenotype C (n = 72, 20.6%), phenotype D (n = 72, 20.6%). Phenotype A (9.17 ± 4.56) had the highest mean AMH levels in our study. Comparison of AMH levels showed a statistically significant difference between phenotypes A and D. There was a statistically significant difference on comparison of AMH between NOM, PCOM and all PCOS phenotypes. Conclusions: Phenotype A is the most serious form of PCOS and these patients has all three features which are hyperandrogenism, anovulation and ultrasound findings of polycystic ovary (PCO). AMH reflects the severity of PCOS and patients with Phenotype A have higher AMH levels

    Different Effects of Myoinositol plus Folic Acid versus Combined Oral Treatment on Androgen Levels in PCOS Women

    Get PDF
    Recently, myoinositol (myo-ins) and folic acid combination has gained an important role for treating Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), in addition to combined oral contraceptives (COC). We aimed to examine myo-ins effects on anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and compare them with those ones obtained administering COC. In this prospective study, 137 PCOS patients, diagnosed according to Rotterdam criteria and admitted to the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Outpatient Clinic at Dokuz Eylul University (Izmir, Turkey), were included. After randomization to COC (n=60) and myo-ins (n=77) arms, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, Modified Ferriman Gallwey scores were calculated. Biochemical and hormonal analysis were performed, and LH/FSH and Apo B/A1 ratios were calculated. Data analysis was carried out in demographically and clinically matched 106 patients (COC = 54; myo-ins = 52). After 3-month treatment, increase in HDL and decreases in LH and LH/FSH ratio were statistically more significant only in COC group when compared with baseline (in both cases p>0.05). In myo-ins group, fasting glucose, LDL, DHEAS, total cholesterol, and prolactin levels decreased significantly (for all p<0.05). Progesterone and AMH levels, ovarian volume, ovarian antral follicle, and total antral follicle counts lessened significantly in both groups (for all p<0.05). In PCOS treatment, MYO is observed more effective in reductions of total ovarian volume and AMH levels
    corecore