A Phase 2 Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Internal Carotid Artery Infusion of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived ALD-401 Cells in Patients With Recent Stable Ischemic Stroke (RECOVER-Stroke).

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke has no approved treatments to enhance recovery. ALD-401 is an enriched population of aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem cells, capable of reducing neurological deficits in animal models. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the safety of internal carotid artery, intra-arterially delivered autologous bone marrow-derived ALD-401 in patients with disabling middle cerebral artery stroke in comparison with sham harvest with sham infusion. Secondary objectives were to determine feasibility and efficacy. METHODS: This was a prospective phase 2, industry-funded, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study with blinded assessments. One hundred subjects were planned, aged 30 to 83 years, with confirmed first-time middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke with modified Rankin scale ≥3. Study patients were randomly assigned 3:2 to bone marrow harvest at 11 to 17 days after stroke followed 2 days later by intracarotid infusion of ALD-401 versus sham harvest and then sham infusion in the same timeframe. The primary study outcome was safety based on the incidence of a 4-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale worsening and the proportion of serious adverse events. Efficacy was based on modified Rankin scale change at 90 days. Other secondary outcomes were the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events, disability by Barthel Index, quality of life using EQ-5D, rehabilitation utilization, disability at 1 year, and MRI evidence of complications. RESULTS: There were no infusional or allergic reactions and no difference in treatment emergent adverse events. Four patients had small areas of asymptomatic restricted diffusion on MRI in the treatment group. There was no significant difference between the ALD-401 and placebo groups on the modified Rankin scale for the intent-to-treat population at day 90 (mean difference, 0.3; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.8; P=0.330). There were no significant differences between the groups on any of the secondary efficacy measures. CONCLUSIONS: Intracarotid infusion of ALD-401 does not lead to clinical adverse events in patients with subacute ischemic stroke, although there was a higher incidence of small lesions on MRI in the treatment group. There was no difference in the primary efficacy end point between the groups. The study provides a framework for the design and conduct of future intra-arterial cell therapy trials in stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01273337

Noncontrast Computed Tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score May Modify Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in DAWN

Background and Purpose- It is unknown whether noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) can identify patients who will benefit from intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in the extended time window. We sought to characterize baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) in DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo) and to assess whether ASPECTS modified IAT effect. Methods- Core lab adjudicated ASPECTS scores were analyzed. The trial cohort was divided into 2 groups by qualifying imaging (computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging). ASPECTS-by-treatment interaction was tested for the trial coprimary end points (90-day utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and mRS, 0-2), mRS 0 to 3, and ordinal mRS. ASPECTS was evaluated separately as an ordinal and a dichotomized (0-6 versus 7-10) variable. Results- Of 205 DAWN subjects, 123 (60%) had NCCT ASPECTS, and 82 (40%) had diffusion weighted imaging ASPECTS. There was a significant ordinal NCCT ASPECTS-by-treatment interaction for 90-day utility-weighted mRS (interaction P=0.04) and mRS 0 to 2 (interaction P=0.02). For both end points, IAT effect was more pronounced at higher NCCT ASPECTS. The dichotomized NCCT ASPECTS-by-treatment interaction was significant only for mRS 0 to 2 (interaction P=0.04), where greater treatment benefit was seen in the ASPECTS 7 to 10 group (odds ratio, 7.50 [2.71-20.77] versus odds ratio, 0.48 [0.04-5.40]). A bidirectional treatment effect was observed in the NCCT ASPECTS 0 to 6 group, with treatment associated with not only more mRS 0 to 3 outcomes (50% versus 25%) but also more mRS 5 to 6 outcomes (40% versus 25%). There was no significant modification of IAT effect by diffusion weighted imaging ASPECTS. Conclusions- Baseline NCCT ASPECTS appears to modify IAT effect in DAWN. Higher NCCT ASPECTS was associated with greater benefit from IAT. No treatment interaction was observed for diffusion weighted imaging ASPECTS

Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The Solitaire Flow Restoration Device is a novel, self-expanding stent retriever designed to yield rapid flow restoration in acute cerebral ischaemia. We compared the efficacy and safety of Solitaire with the standard, predicate mechanical thrombectomy device, the Merci Retrieval System. METHODS: In this randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled patients from 18 sites (17 in the USA and one in France). Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had acute ischaemic stroke with moderate to severe neurological deficits and were treatable by thrombectomy within 8 h of stroke symptom onset. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate patients to receive thrombectomy treatment with either Solitaire or Merci (1:1; block sizes of four and stratified by centre and stroke severity). The primary endpoint was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) scale 2 or 3 flow in all treatable vessels without symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, after up to three passes of the assigned device, as assessed by an independent core laboratory, which was masked to study assignment. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. A prespecified efficacy stopping rule triggered an early halt to the trial. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 01054560. RESULTS: Between February, 2010, and February, 2011, we randomly allocated 58 patients to the Solitaire group and 55 patients to the Merci group. The primary efficacy outcome was achieved more often in the Solitaire group than it was in the Merci group (61%vs 24%; difference 37% [95% CI 19-53], odds ratio [OR] 4·87 [95% CI 2·14-11·10]; p(non-inferiority) INTERPRETATION: The Solitaire Flow Restoration Device achieved substantially better angiographic, safety, and clinical outcomes than did the Merci Retrieval System. The Solitaire device might be a future treatment of choice for endovascular recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke. FUNDING: Covidien/ev3

Benefit of Endovascular Thrombectomy by Mode of Onset: Secondary Analysis of the DAWN Trial

Background and Purpose— It is unknown whether the benefit of thrombectomy in late presenting acute stroke patients with imaging evidence of clinical-infarct mismatch is different in patients presenting with wake-up stroke compared with those presenting with witnessed onset or unwitnessed onset. Methods— Prespecified secondary analysis was performed from DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Imaging [DWI] or Computerized Tomography Perfusion [CTP] Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention), a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with blinded end point assessment comparing thrombectomy with the Trevo device against standard medical therapy in patients with acute stroke and clinical-infarct mismatch presenting 6 to 24 hour after the time last seen well. For the purposes of this study, the primary outcome was the proportion of modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between outcome and mode of onset. Results— All 206 enrolled patients were included in the study. Mode of onset was: wake-up stroke (55.3%, n=114), witnessed onset (12.1%, n=25), and unwitnessed onset (32.5%, n=67) with median time last seen well to randomization (13.4±3.7, 10.0±3.7, 14.1±4.9 hours) respectively. Rates of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the thrombectomy arm were not statistically different across patient onset subtypes (P=0.79 and P=0.40, respectively). The benefit of thrombectomy compared with best medical therapy was maintained across all 3 onset modes (rates of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 in patients allocated to thrombectomy versus control: wake-up stroke—49.3% versus 10.6%, witnessed onset—63.6% versus 21.4%, UW—41.4% versus 13.2%; P×interaction=0.79). In univariable and multivariable analyses, mode of onset was not identified as a significant predictor of modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Conclusions— In patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting between 6 and 24 hours from time last seen well and harboring clinical-infarct mismatch, the benefit of thrombectomy was similar regardless of the wake-up, unwitnessed, or witnessed mode of onset

Abstract 1122‐000075: Optimization of Transport Protocols to Increase the Odds of Thrombectomy

Introduction: We sought to determine a distance threshold where mode of transportation impacted treatment options for potential thrombectomy patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed transferred stroke patients to our comprehensive stroke center within 8 hours of onset from January 2017 to December 2019. In our analysis, all patients had a CTA confirmed large vessel occlusion, NIHSS >10 and arrived within 8 hours of onset as a candidate for thrombectomy. Patients were not treated with thrombectomy if they presented with a completed infarct or hemorrhagic conversion. Patients were transferred by air or ground based on availability and safety. Transfers were grouped based on distance: 0–30 miles, 31–60 miles, 61–90 and > 90 miles. We performed a binomial logistic regression for each distance group to determine a threshold where the odds of receiving thrombectomy statistically decoupled based on mode of transportation. Results: Of the 243 patients reviewed, 52.1% (126) received thrombectomy. Transport for 50.8% (123) patients was by air. Hospitals transferring within 0–30 miles accounted for 26.6% (65); 31–60 miles accounted for 22.1% (54); 61–90 miles accounted for25.8% (63) and >90 miles accounted for 24.8% (60). The odds of receiving a thrombectomy were significantly higher with air transportation (OR 3.0, CI 1.04‐8.74, p = 0.043) at a distance threshold of >90 miles. At a distance threshold of 10 to 30 miles, the odds of receiving a thrombectomy were significantly higher with ground transportation (OR 5.5, CI 1.15‐26.14, p = 0.032). There was no difference between modes of transportation for 31 to 90 miles. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that air transport beyond 90 miles increases the odds of receiving a thrombectomy for patients arriving within 8 hours of symptom onset. Ground transport, rather than air transport, between 10 and 30 miles may be more beneficial. Our results suggest that specific regional transport thresholds based on distance do exist and if recognized and altered can result in more favorable transfers

Serial ASPECTS in the DAWN Trial: Infarct Evolution and Clinical Impact

Background and purpose: The impact of baseline ischemia on Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and evolution over 24 hours may be distinct in late thrombectomy. We analyzed predictors of serial ASPECTS and clinical outcomes in the DAWN trial (Diffusion-Weighted Imaging or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo). Methods: The DAWN Imaging Core Laboratory independently scored ASPECTS at baseline and 24 hours. Descriptive statistics characterized ASPECTS on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and 24 hours, delineating ASPECTS change over 24 hours. Results: 206 subjects (mean age 70.0±13.7 years; 54.9% (n=113) female; baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale median (interquartile range) 17 (13, 21) were included. Baseline ASPECTS was median (interquartile range) 8.0 (7–8), with 92/205 (44.9%) between 0 and 7 and 113/205 (55.1%) 8 and 10. 24-hour ASPECTS was median 6.0 (4–8), with ASPECTS change or infarct evolution having median −1, ranging from −8 to +2. Multivariable logistic regression showed older age (odds ratio [OR] for 10-year interval, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.02–1.55], P=0.030) and dyslipidemia (OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.06–3.19], P=0.031) were independently associated with higher baseline ASPECTS. Higher 24-hour ASPECTS was predicted by endovascular treatment (OR, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.58–4.81], P=0.0004), baseline glucose \u3c150 mg/dL (OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.50–5.46], P=0.001), lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89–0.98], P=0.010), and older age (OR for 10-year interval, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.01–1.55], P=0.041). Internal carotid artery lesion location (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.24–0.89], P=0.021) was inversely related to 24-hour ASPECTS. Good clinical outcome (day 90 modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was predicted by 24-hour ASPECTS (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.08–1.96], P=0.014). Extensive infarct evolution (ASPECTS decrease ≥6) occurred in 14/201 (7.0%). Elevated baseline serum glucose ≥150 mg/dL was a predictor of ASPECTS decrease of ≥4 points (OR, 2.78 [95% CI, 1.21–6.35] P=0.016) as was internal carotid artery occlusion (OR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.05–5.88]; P=0.038). ASPECTS change was influenced by treatment arm (P=0.001 by Wilcoxon), including 0 ASPECTS change in 42/105 (40.0%) of the endovascular arm and only 20/96 (20.8%) of the medical arm. Conclusions: DAWN subjects enrolled with small infarct cores had a broad range of baseline ASPECTS. Twenty-four-hour ASPECTS, strikingly influenced by endovascular therapy, predicted good clinical outcomes. Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02142283

Trevo 2000: Results of a Large Real-World Registry for Stent Retriever for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background Recent randomized controlled trials show benefit of thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in stroke. Real-world data aid in assessing reproducibility of outcomes outside of clinical trials. The Trevo Retriever Registry is a multicenter, international, prospective study designed to assess outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results The Trevo Registry is a prospective database of patients with large vessel occlusion treated with the Trevo device as the first device. The primary end point is revascularization based on modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score and secondary end points include 90-day modified Rankin Scale, 90-day mortality, neurological deterioration at 24 hours, and device/procedure related adverse events. Year 2008 patients were enrolled at 76 centers in 12 countries. Median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 16 (interquartile range, 11-20). Occlusion sites were internal carotid artery (17.8%), middle cerebral artery (73.5%), posterior circulation (7.1%), and distal vascular locations (1.6%). A modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b or 3 was achieved in 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6, 93.9) of procedures, with 55.3% (95% CI, 53.1, 57.5) of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at 3 months. Patients meeting revised 2015 American Heart Association criteria for thrombectomy had a 59.7% (95% CI , 56.0; 63.4) modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at 3 months, whereas 51.4% treated outside of American Heart Association criteria had modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2. 51.4% (95% CI , 49.6, 55.4). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate was 1.7% (95% CI , 1.2, 2.4). Conclusions The Trevo Retriever Registry represents real-world data with stent retriever. The registry demonstrates similar reperfusion rates and outcomes in the community compared with rigorous centrally adjudicated clinical trials. Future subgroup analysis of this cohort will assist in identifying areas of future research. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02040259

Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy: evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial.

BACKGROUND: In light of recent positive trial data for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stent retriever use by practitioners without prior experience with these devices may become more common. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for AIS using Solitaire for patients treated in the roll-in period of the Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial, which represented the first clinical use of the device for these interventionalists. METHODS: Prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and angiographic data on patients treated in the initial roll-in and subsequent randomized phases of the SWIFT study were collected and analyzed. Key statistical analyses were validated by an independent external statistician. RESULTS: Patients in the roll-in period achieved equivalently high rates of reperfusion (55%) compared with those treated with the device in the randomized phase (61%). Rates of adverse events were comparable (13% vs. 9%). Rates of good neurological outcome were equivalent between the roll-in and randomized patients treated with Solitaire (63% vs. 58%). Including the roll-in patients strengthened the conclusions of the study, that reperfusion rates without symptomatic hemorrhage with Solitaire were greater than with Merci (59% vs. 24%, p\u3c0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombectomy in AIS using the Solitaire stent retriever device can be performed safely and effectively when used by experienced neurointerventionalists without previous experience with the device. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The SWIFT study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 01054560