Hereditary deficiency of protein C or protein S confers increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events at a young age: results from a large family cohort study.

Contains fulltext : 70054.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Whether hereditary protein S, protein C, or antithrombin deficiency is associated with arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and whether history of venous thromboembolism in these subjects predisposes them to subsequent ATE have yet to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: On the basis of pedigree analysis, we enrolled a total of 552 subjects (52% women; mean age, 46+/-17 years), belonging to 84 different kindreds, in this retrospective family cohort study. Detailed information on previous episodes of venous thromboembolism, ATE, anticoagulant use, and atherosclerosis risk factors was collected. Primary study outcome was objectively verified symptomatic ATE. Of 552 subjects, 308 had protein S (35%), protein C (39%), or antithrombin (26%) deficiency. Overall, annual incidences of ATE were 0.34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.49) in deficient versus 0.17% (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28) in nondeficient subjects; the hazard ratio was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2 to 4.5). Because the risk hazards varied over lifetime, we performed a time-dependent analysis. After adjusting for atherosclerosis risk factors and clustering within families, we found that deficient subjects had a 4.7-fold (95% CI, 1.5 to 14.2; P=0.007) higher risk for ATE before 55 years of age versus 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.6) thereafter compared with nondeficient family members. For separate deficiencies, the risks were 4.6- (95% CI, 1.1 to 18.3), 6.9- (95% CI, 2.1 to 22.2), and 1.1- (95% CI, 0.1 to 10.9) fold higher in protein S-, protein C-, and antithrombin-deficient subjects, respectively, before 55 years of age. History of venous thromboembolism was not related to subsequent ATE (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nondeficient family members, subjects with protein S or protein C deficiency but not antithrombin deficiency have a higher risk for ATE before 55 years of age that is independent of prior venous thromboembolism

High long-term absolute risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C or antithrombin.

Hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C and antithrombin are known risk factors for first venous thromboembolism. We assessed the absolute risk of recurrence, and the contribution of concomitant thrombophilic defects in a large cohort of families with these deficiencies. Annual incidence of recurrence was estimated in 130 deficient patients, with separate estimates for those with each of protein S, protein C, and antithrombin deficiency, and in eight non-deficient patients with prior venous thromboembolism. All patients were also tested for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, high levels of factors VIII, IX and XI, and hyperhomocysteinemia. There were 81 recurrent events among 130 deficient patients. Median follow-up was 4.6 years. Annual incidences (95% confidence interval) of recurrent venous thromboembolism were 8.4% (5.8-11.7) for protein S deficiency, 6.0% (3.9-8.7) for protein C deficiency, 10.0% (6.1-15.4) for antithrombin deficiency, and overall 7.7% (6.1-9.5). Relative risk of recurrence in patients with a spontaneous versus provoked first event was 1.5 (0.95-2.3). Cumulative recurrence rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 15%, 38% and 53%. Relative risk of recurrence with concomitant defects was 1.4 (0.7-2.6) (1 defect) and 1.4 (0.8-2.7) (> or =2 defects). Annual incidence was 1.0% (0.03-5.5) in eight non-deficient patients. Annual incidence of major bleeding in deficient patients on oral anticoagulant treatment was 0.5% (0.2-1.0). We conclude that patients with a hereditary protein S, protein C or antithrombin deficiency appear to have a high absolute risk of recurrence. This risk is increased after a first spontaneous event, and by concomitance of other thrombophilic defects

High absolute risks and predictors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with nephrotic syndrome: results from a large retrospective cohort study.

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: No data are available on the absolute risk of either venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Reported risks are based on multiple case reports and small studies with mostly short-term follow-up. We assessed the absolute risk of VTE and ATE in a large, single-center, retrospective cohort study and attempted to identify predictive factors in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 298 consecutive patients with nephrotic syndrome (59% men; mean age, 42+/-18 years) were enrolled. Mean follow-up was 10+/-9 years. Nephrotic syndrome was defined by proteinuria > or =3.5 g/d, and patients were classified according to underlying histological lesions accounting for nephrotic syndrome. Objectively verified symptomatic thromboembolic events were the primary study outcome. Annual incidences of VTE and ATE were 1.02% (95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.46) and 1.48% (95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.99), respectively. Over the first 6 months of follow-up, these rates were 9.85% and 5.52%, respectively. Proteinuria and serum albumin levels tended to be related to VTE; however, only the predictive value of the ratio of proteinuria to serum albumin was significant (hazard ratio, 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 26.2; P=0.03). In contrast, neither the degree of proteinuria nor serum albumin levels were related to ATE. Sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, prior ATE, and estimated glomerular filtration rate predicted ATE (P< or =0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study verifies high absolute risks of symptomatic VTE and ATE that were remarkably elevated within the first 6 months. Whereas the ratio of proteinuria to serum albumin predicted VTE, estimated glomerular filtration rate and multiple classic risk factors for atherosclerosis were predictors of ATE

A prospective cohort study on the absolute risks of venous thromboembolism and predictive value of screening asymptomatic relatives of patients with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C or antithrombin.

Contains fulltext : 87552.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Absolute risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in protein S-, protein C-, or antithrombin-deficient subjects are mainly based on retrospective data. Screening asymptomatic relatives of these patients is disputed, though studies addressing this issue have yet to be conducted. METHODS: We prospectively followed 382 relatives of 84 probands. Participants were assessed for other thrombophilic defects and occurrence of exogenous risk factors (i.e. surgery/trauma/immobilization, malignancies, use of systemic estrogens, and pregnancy/puerperium). After screening, deficient subjects were advised to use thromboprophylaxis during exogenous risk factors; use of oral contraceptives was discouraged. RESULTS: Overall annual incidence of VTE was 1.53% (95% CI, 1.00-2.34) in deficient vs. 0.29% (0.13-0.64) in non-deficient relatives; adjusted hazard ratio, 7.0 (95% CI, 2.7-18.0). Annual incidence of unprovoked VTE was 0.95% in deficient vs. 0.05% in non-deficient subjects; age-adjusted hazard ratio, 22.3 (P = 0.003). In contrast, annual incidence of provoked VTE was 0.58% vs. 0.24%; age-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.8 (P = 0.08). Fifty-five (37%) deficient and 80 (34%) non-deficient subjects experienced 91 and 143 exogenous risk factors, respectively, during which six vs. five VTEs (6.6% vs 3.5% per risk-period) occurred, despite the higher compliance with recommended thromboprophylaxis use in deficient (51%) vs. non-deficient (22%) subjects. In deficient subjects all provoked VTEs occurred when thromboprophylaxis was not used. CONCLUSIONS: Protein S, protein C or antithrombin deficiencies confer high absolute risk of VTE. Screening and subsequent augmentation of thromboprophylaxis use may result in reduction of provoked VTE, whereas risk of unprovoked VTE could not be affected by screening.1 juni 201

Selective testing for thrombophilia in patients with first venous thrombosis: results from a retrospective family cohort study on absolute thrombotic risk for currently known thrombophilic defects in 2479 relatives.

Thrombophilia screening is controversial. In a retrospective family cohort, where probands had thrombosis and a thrombophilic defect, 2479 relatives were tested for thrombophilia. In antithrombin-, protein C-, and protein S-deficient relatives, annual incidences of venous thrombosis were 1.77% (95% CI, 1.14-2.60), 1.52% (95% CI, 1.06-2.11), and 1.90% (95% CI, 1.32-2.64), respectively, at a median age of 29 years and a positive family history of more than 20% symptomatic relatives. In relatives with factor V (FV) Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high FVIII levels, these were 0.49% (95% CI, 0.39-0.60), 0.34% (95% CI, 0.22-0.49), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.41-0.51), respectively. High FIX, FXI, and TAFI, and hyperhomocysteinemia were not independent risk factors. Annual incidence of major bleeding in antithrombin-, protein C-, or protein S-deficient relatives on anticoagulants was 0.29% (95% CI, 0.03-1.04). Cumulative recurrence rates in relatives with antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency were 19% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 55% at 10 years. In relatives with FV Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high levels FVIII, these were 7%, 11%, and 25%, respectively. Considering its clinical implications, thrombophilia testing should address hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S in patients with first venous thrombosis at young age and/or a strong family history of venous thrombosis