Technical comparison of four different extracorporeal photopheresis systems

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a therapeutic technique that combines leukapheresis and ultraviolet (UV)A irradiation of the leukapheresate after 8-methoxypsoralen treatment with subsequent retransfusion. It can be achieved with a single device (online) or by combining an apheresis machine with a separate UVA light source (offline). The comparability of both established methods is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective setting, four ECP systems were evaluated: one with integrated UVA irradiation for online ECP (Therakos) and three with external UVA irradiation for offline ECP (Amicus, Optia, and Cobe Spectra). Apheresis variables and cell counts were determined by methods including flow cytometry. RESULTS: The duration of apheresis ranged from 120 minutes (Amicus, Optia) to 275 minutes (Therakos). Mononuclear cell (MNC) counts in the treatment bags were comparable between offline ECP methods and lower for online ECP. CD16+ monocytes were abundant in online ECP (82%) but rarer in offline ECP (median, 14% – 19%). Hematocrit ranged from 0.1% (Therakos) to 8% (Amicus). There were no side effects in any patients. DISCUSSION: All offline ECP systems studied yielded comparable cellular compositions and highly enriched populations of MNCs. In contrast, white blood cells from online ECP displayed enrichment of nonclassical monocytes. The relevance of these findings is unknown as there is no established biomarker to predict the therapeutic efficacy of these procedures

Multistep screening and selection of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma donors at the early stage of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: A retrospective analysis

Background and Aims The COVID-19 pandemic reached Bavaria in February 2020. Almost simultaneously, Chinese physicians published reports on the first successful treatments with plasma from COVID-19 convalescent donors. With these silver linings on the horizon, we decided to establish the manufacturing of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody-containing plasma from COVID-19 convalescent donors at our site. Here we describe our donor selection process, built from the ground up, which enabled us to cope with the immense resonance after our social media call for donors. Methods As a first step, we created a specific questionnaire for telephone interviews applied by trained students to filter the wave of callers interested in plasma donation. Afterward, the medical staff evaluated the hotline questionnaires and chose eligible donors to be invited for on-site donor evaluation. Data documentation was performed with MS Excel, and statistical analyses were calculated with GraphPad Prism 8. A quantitative in-house ELISA was used to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and determine specific titers. Results Out of 1465 calls from potential plasma donors, we could register 420 persons with a completed questionnaire. Evaluation of questionnaires identified 222 of 420 persons as eligible for donation, and 55 were directly asked for on-site donor qualification. Subsequently, as anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers ≥1:800 were required, we invited 89 of 222 potential donors for an antibody screening. This procedure resulted in another 28 potential donors for an on-site evaluation. Finally, 12 donors qualified with a titer of 1:400 and 24 with ≥1:800. Conclusion Identifying suitable COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors was expected to be highly time-consuming. Implementing a screening procedure with our hotline questionnaire helped us streamline the donor selection process and reduce the workload for the staff. We propose combining the described selection process with the later introduced on-site antibody screening as an effective strategy

Apoptosis induction by extracorporeal photopheresis is enhanced by increasing the 8‐methoxypsoralen concentration and by replacing plasma with saline

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an apheresis-based therapy for various immunological diseases, works mainly by inducing apoptosis in lymphocytes. Several factors influence the efficacy of ECP with the photosensitizer 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and ultraviolet light A (UVA). This study aimed to optimize treatment by varying the 8-MOP starting concentration and the cell suspension medium. Materials and Methods All patients (n = 13) included in this study received photopheresis as medically indicated. Cells collected with a Spectra Optia apheresis system were suspended in plasma or physiological saline (NaCl) and incubated with 200 ng/ml versus 340 ng/ml photosensitizer before UVA irradiation (Macogenic G2 or UVA PIT system). Lymphocyte apoptosis and caspase activity were analyzed by flow cytometry and fluorimetry, and residual 8-methoxypsoralen concentrations by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Results Raising the 8-MOP starting concentration significantly increased lymphocyte apoptosis, with values of 22% versus 35% (plasma) and 28%–46% (NaCl) at 24 h post-ECP and 37% versus 86% (plasma) and 74% versus 97% (NaCl) at 48 h for 200 ng/ml versus 340 ng/ml. Pre-transfusion residual 8-MOP levels were 168 ng/ml (plasma) and 162 ng/ml (NaCl) versus 290 ng/ml (plasma) and 266 ng/ml (NaCl) for the lower versus higher dose, respectively. Discussion Hence, 8-MOP concentration influences the efficacy of photopheresis as lymphocyte apoptosis rates were significantly higher with the higher starting concentration and with NaCl versus plasma. This indicates that increased 8-MOP starting doses and saline as additional suspension medium could help in improving ECP's efficacy

Granulocyte concentrate splitting does not affect phenotype and function

Background: More granulocyte concentrates (GCs) could be produced for more patients from the same donor if apheresis bags were split and stored for longer periods of time. Hence, we tested the hypothesis that splitting and extension of storage of GCs do not impair granulocyte function or viability. Study Design and Methods: Granulocyte apheresis concentrates were produced using modified fluid gelatin as a separation enhancer, split into two portions, and stored for 24 and 48 h. Granulocyte function, represented by cell migration, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), was measured by live-cell imaging. ROS production, adhesive surface protein expression, and viability were measured by flow cytometry. Results: Splitting had no effect on any of the tested parameters. After 24 h of storage, live-cell imaging showed no significant difference in migration, time to maximum ROS production, time to half-maximum NETosis, viability, or CD11b expression, but ROS production induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) decreased from an initial median fluorescence intensity of 1775–590 artificial units. After 48 h, PMA-induced ROS production, viability, and migration declined, as reflected by decreases in median total distance (119 vs. 63.5 μm) and median Euclidean distance (30.75 vs. 14.3 μm). Conclusion: Splitting GC products has no effect on granulocyte viability or function, but extended storage >24 h does compromise granulocyte function. The findings confirm that GCs should be transfused within 24 h of collection. Longer storage cannot be recommended

Granulocyte concentrate splitting does not affect phenotype and function

Background: More granulocyte concentrates (GCs) could be produced for more patients from the same donor if apheresis bags were split and stored for longer periods of time. Hence, we tested the hypothesis that splitting and extension of storage of GCs do not impair granulocyte function or viability. Study Design and Methods: Granulocyte apheresis concentrates were produced using modified fluid gelatin as a separation enhancer, split into two portions, and stored for 24 and 48 h. Granulocyte function, represented by cell migration, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), was measured by live-cell imaging. ROS production, adhesive surface protein expression, and viability were measured by flow cytometry. Results: Splitting had no effect on any of the tested parameters. After 24 h of storage, live-cell imaging showed no significant difference in migration, time to maximum ROS production, time to half-maximum NETosis, viability, or CD11b expression, but ROS production induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) decreased from an initial median fluorescence intensity of 1775–590 artificial units. After 48 h, PMA-induced ROS production, viability, and migration declined, as reflected by decreases in median total distance (119 vs. 63.5 μm) and median Euclidean distance (30.75 vs. 14.3 μm). Conclusion: Splitting GC products has no effect on granulocyte viability or function, but extended storage >24 h does compromise granulocyte function. The findings confirm that GCs should be transfused within 24 h of collection. Longer storage cannot be recommended

Central Suppression of the GH/IGF Axis and Abrogation of Exercise-Related mTORC1/2 Activation in the Muscle of Phenotype-Selected Male Marathon Mice (DUhTP)

The somatotropic axis is required for a number of biological processes, including growth, metabolism, and aging. Due to its central effects on growth and metabolism and with respect to its positive effects on muscle mass, regulation of the GH/IGF-system during endurance exercise is of particular interest. In order to study the control of gene expression and adaptation related to physical performance, we used a non-inbred mouse model, phenotype-selected for high running performance (DUhTP). Gene expression of the GH/IGF-system and related signaling cascades were studied in the pituitary gland and muscle of sedentary males of marathon and unselected control mice. In addition, the effects of three weeks of endurance exercise were assessed in both genetic groups. In pituitary glands from DUhTP mice, reduced expression of Pou1f1 (p = 0.002) was accompanied by non-significant reductions of Gh mRNA (p = 0.066). In addition, mRNA expression of Ghsr and Sstr2 were significantly reduced in the pituitary glands from DUhTP mice (p ≤ 0.05). Central downregulation of Pou1f1 expression was accompanied by reduced serum concentrations of IGF1 and coordinated downregulation of multiple GH/IGF-signaling compounds in muscle (e.g., Ghr, Igf1, Igf1r, Igf2r, Irs1, Irs2, Akt3, Gskb, Pik3ca/b/a2, Pten, Rictor, Rptor, Tsc1, Mtor; p ≤ 0.05). In response to exercise, the expression of Igfbp3, Igfbp 4, and Igfbp 6 and Stc2 mRNA was increased in the muscle of DUhTP mice (p ≤ 0.05). Training-induced specific activation of AKT, S6K, and p38 MAPK was found in muscles from control mice but not in DUhTP mice (p ≤ 0.05), indicating a lack of mTORC1 and mTORC2 activation in marathon mice in response to physical exercise. While hormone-dependent mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways in marathon mice were repressed, robust increases of Ragulator complex compounds (p ≤ 0.001) and elevated sirtuin 2 to 6 mRNA expression were observed in the DUhTP marathon mouse model (p ≤ 0.05). Activation of AMPK was not observed under the experimental conditions of the present study. Our results describe coordinated downregulation of the somatotropic pathway in long-term selected marathon mice (DUhTP), possibly via the pituitary gland and muscle interaction. Our results, for the first time, demonstrate that GH/IGF effects are repressed in a context of superior running performance in mice

Feasibility of peripheral blood stem cell collection from sickle cell trait donors with an intensified G‐CSF regimen

Objectives Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for SCD and bone marrow from an HLA-matched sibling is currently the standard of care. Haploidentical HSCT from a family donor with a TCR αβ/CD19 depleted graft (T-haplo) is an increasingly successful alternative, which requires the generation of G-CSF stimulated peripheral stem cell (PBSC) from haploidentical relatives. These sickle cell trait (SCT) donors reported to develop SCD-related complications in conditions of severe stress. Methods In this retrospective analysis, we compared the safety and efficacy of PBSC mobilization with a G-CSF intensified mobilization regimen in SCT donors with a conventional G-CSF mobilization regimen in healthy donors. Results The reported adverse events were similar during intensified G-CSF mobilization, apheresis, and shortly after stem cell apheresis in SCT and control donors. In SCT and control donors, we were able to mobilize high yields of CD34+ stem cells and the harvested CD34+ cell count was comparable with control donors. Conclusions Peripheral stem cell mobilization using an intensified G-CSF regimen is safe, and well tolerated among SCT donors. SCT donors are a valid alternative for collection of peripheral CD34+ stem cells for T-cell-depleted haploidentical stem cell transplantation