6 research outputs found

    Campus-Based Organizing: Academic and Student Activism

    No full text

    A photonumeric scale for the assessment of atrophic facial photodamage

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Photonumeric scales have consistently shown superiority over descriptive equivalents. They have the advantage of providing a consistent visual frame of reference by minimising variability in perception and subjectivity. A photonumeric scale to assess hypertrophic facial photodamage already exists. However, there is currently no objective measure for atrophic facial photodamage. To address this, we have devised a nine-point photonumeric standardised scale.OBJECTIVES: To design, test and validate a photonumeric scale for the assessment of atrophic facial photodamage against a descriptive scale for the same indication.METHODS: A pool of 393 facial photographs (en face and 45º oblique) from 131 individuals with atrophic facial photodamage was created. Five photographic standards were selected and assigned grades 0 through 8, where 0 is no photodamage and 8 is severe atrophic photodamage, thus making a nine-point scale. Twenty photographs spanning the entire range of values were selected to test the scale. Testing was performed alongside a descriptive equivalent. A panel of 10 dermatologists, 10 non-dermatology clinicians and 14 dermatology scientists marked the two scales; marking was repeated one week later.RESULTS: There was a significantly greater agreement between the graders using the photonumeric scale than the descriptive scale (kappa values 0.71 and 0.37 with standardised errors of 0.57 and 0.17 respectively) with no significant difference in repeatability between the two methods (p &lt; 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The study describes a new photonumeric scale for atrophic photodamage. This would be a useful adjunct in both the clinical and research settings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p

    The management of solitary trichoepithelioma versus basal cell carcinoma

    No full text
    Currently, all lesions diagnosed clinically as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are treated by the excision of the lesion with 3–4 mm margins followed by histopathological examination to assess clearance and confirm the diagnosis. We present the findings of surgical incisional and excisional biopsy of three young patients diagnosed on clinical examination as having BCC, who were found on histological examination to have trichoepithelioma. Whilst it may be possible to distinguish the features of trichoepithelioma in incisional biopsy specimens on morphological grounds alone it is often difficult, and immunohistochemical staining, to delineate the features of the basement membrane, provides useful additional information in the histological diagnosis. As trichoepithelioma is more common in the young it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in young patients presenting with BCC-like lesions of the periocular tissues. This subgroup of patients should have incisional biopsy carried out, and if the diagnosis of trichoepithelioma is confirmed the lesion may be excised with a small margin of healthy tissue, thereby facilitating surgical repair
    corecore