41 research outputs found

    Interaction between dietary iron overload and aflatoxin B1 in hepatocarcinogenesis using an experimental rat model

    Get PDF
    Student Number : 9902006N - MSc(Med) Dissertation - School of Medicine - Faculty of Health SciencesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumour of the liver. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a potent hepatocarcinogen, and dietary iron overload has been shown to contribute to HCC development in black africans. Both are well studied hepatotoxins. The aim of this study was to use a Wistar rat model over a 12 month period to investigate synergy and the extent thereof between AFB1 ingestion and dietary iron overload. 25ug/day of AFB1, reconstituted in DMSO, was administered by gavaging the animals, over a period of 10 days with a 2 day interval in between. The chow diet was supplemented with 0.75% (w/w) ferrocene iron. Experimental subjects were divided into 4 groups. Group 1 was fed the normal chow diet. Group 2 was fed 0.75% (w/w) ferrocene iron alone. Group 3 was gavaged 250μg AFB1 alone. Group 4 was fed the 0.75% (w/w) ferrocene iron and gavaged 250μg AFB1. A number of assays were conducted to investigate synergy. Colorimetric assays were used to measure serum iron, total-iron binding capacity, ALT, AST, GGT, nitrite production, lipid peroxidation and hydroxyproline concentrations. ELISA’s were used to determine ferritin, 8-isoprostane and 8-hydroxyguanosine concentrations. Nontransferrin bound iron was measured using an HPLC method. A chemiluminescent assay was used to measure superoxide anion production. Cytokines were measured using a suspension array system. Mutagenicity was assessed using the Ames mutagenicity assay using salmonella typhimirium strains TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA102. Iron profiling indicated that iron overloading occurred with the ingestion of the ferrocene diet. Biomarkers of oxidative stress, as illustrated by the measurement of 8-hydroxyguanosine and lipid peroxidation, showed additive synergistic effects between the two carcinogens. The anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 was shown to be markedly elevated with the co-administration of the two carcinogens, indicating the elevated inflammatory processes. Additive synergistic effects were noted in terms of the liver disease marker ALT. The salmonella typhimirium strain TA102 used in the Ames mutagenicity test showed increased colony counts with respect to the coadministration of carcinogens (P<0.05), although no synergistic effect was noted. In a few of the presented parameters, the AFB1 group was not significantly different to the control group, although significant differences between the Fe group and the Fe + AFB1 groups were noted. The implication of which is that the presence of AFB1 is increasing the activity of Fe as a carcinogen, thereby acting as a co-carcinogen. Examples of such parameters illustrating this are presented in the results section including serum ALT, serum nitrite, liver and serum lipid peroxidation, liver and serum 8-hydroxyguanosine, some of the mutagenicity assays, and interleukin-10. The conclusion of this study suggests that AFB1 acts as a co-carcinogen in the presence of iron overloading, implying that a synergistic relationship between these two toxins exists

    HIV-1 Phenotypic Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Drug Resistance Test Interpretation Is Not Dependent on the Subtype of the Virus Backbone

    Get PDF
    To date, the majority of HIV-1 phenotypic resistance testing has been performed with subtype B virus backbones (e.g. HXB2). However, the relevance of using this backbone to determine resistance in non-subtype B HIV-1 viruses still needs to be assessed. From 114 HIV-1 subtype C clinical samples (36 ARV-naïve, 78 ARV-exposed), pol amplicons were produced and analyzed for phenotypic resistance using both a subtype B- and C-backbone in which the pol fragment was deleted. Phenotypic resistance was assessed in resulting recombinant virus stocks (RVS) for a series of antiretroviral drugs (ARV's) and expressed as fold change (FC), yielding 1660 FC comparisons. These Antivirogram® derived FC values were categorized as having resistant or sensitive susceptibility based on biological cut-off values (BCOs). The concordance between resistance calls obtained for the same clinical sample but derived from two different backbones (i.e. B and C) accounted for 86.1% (1429/1660) of the FC comparisons. However, when taking the assay variability into account, 95.8% (1590/1660) of the phenotypic data could be considered as being concordant with respect to their resistance call. No difference in the capacity to detect resistance associated with M184V, K103N and V106M mutations was noted between the two backbones. The following was concluded: (i) A high level of concordance was shown between the two backbone phenotypic resistance profiles; (ii) Assay variability is largely responsible for discordant results (i.e. for FC values close to BCO); (iii) Confidence intervals should be given around the BCO's, when assessing resistance in HIV-1 subtype C; (iv) No systematic resistance under- or overcalling of subtype C amplicons in the B-backbone was observed; (v) Virus backbone subtype sequence variability outside the pol region does not contribute to phenotypic FC values. In conclusion the HXB2 virus backbone remains an acceptable vector for phenotyping HIV-1 subtype C pol amplicons

    A comparative analysis of HIV drug resistance interpretation based on short reverse transcriptase sequences versus full sequences

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) becomes more accessible in resource-limited settings (RLS), the need for more affordable monitoring tools such as point-of-care viral load assays and simplified genotypic HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) tests increases substantially. The prohibitive expenses of genotypic HIVDR assays could partly be addressed by focusing on a smaller region of the HIV reverse transcriptase gene (RT) that encompasses the majority of HIVDR mutations for people on ART in RLS. In this study, an <it>in silico </it>analysis of 125,329 RT sequences was performed to investigate the effect of submitting short RT sequences (codon 41 to 238) to the commonly used virco<sup>®</sup>TYPE and Stanford genotype interpretation tools.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Pair-wise comparisons between full-length and short RT sequences were performed. Additionally, a non-inferiority approach with a concordance limit of 95% and two-sided 95% confidence intervals was used to demonstrate concordance between HIVDR calls based on full-length and short RT sequences.</p> <p>The results of this analysis showed that HIVDR interpretations based on full-length versus short RT sequences, using the Stanford algorithms, had concordance significantly above 95%. When using the virco<sup>®</sup>TYPE algorithm, similar concordance was demonstrated (>95%), but some differences were observed for d4T, AZT and TDF, where predictions were affected in more than 5% of the sequences. Most differences in interpretation, however, were due to shifts from fully susceptible to reduced susceptibility (d4T) or from reduced response to minimal response (AZT, TDF) or vice versa, as compared to the predicted full RT sequence. The virco<sup>®</sup>TYPE prediction uses many more mutations outside the RT 41-238 amino acid domain, which significantly contribute to the HIVDR prediction for these 3 antiretroviral agents.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study illustrates the acceptability of using a shortened RT sequences (codon 41-238) to obtain reliable genotype interpretations by virco<sup>®</sup>TYPE and Stanford algorithms. Implementation of this simplified protocol could significantly reduce the cost of both resistance testing and ARV treatment monitoring in RLS.</p

    In vitro HIV-1 drug resistance phenotyping, genotyping and novel virological failure detection tools for clinical patient management.

    No full text
    Of the 22.5 million individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in sub-Saharan Africa, 62% of patients requiring treatment had access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 2011. The delivery of HAART and the appropriate laboratory monitoring of HIV positive individuals in sub-Saharan African countries has become a public health priority, an intervention which has and will continue to dramatically reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality. Routine laboratory monitoring of HIV infected individuals should ideally include CD4+ T cell testing to assess when to start ART, viral load monitoring to assess virological failure on ART and when indicated, HIVDR genotyping.However, this is often not implemented in resource limited settings due to challenges such as inadequate infrastructure and laboratory capacity, amongst others. Thus the Affordable Resistance Testing for Africa (ART-A) initiative was established to develop an affordable HIV drug resistance testing (HIVDR) algorithm applicable to Africa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of in vitro HIVDR phenotyping in the context of HIV-1 subtype C (the most prevalent circulating subtype in sub-Saharan Africa), genotyping and genotypic interpretation tools using existing algorithms, as well as novel virological failure detection tools for clinical patient management. Current gold standard HIVDR phenotyping technologies use an HIV-1 subtype B backbone to create recombinant viruses with patient-derived polymerase (protease and partial reverse transcriptase). This backbone could impact on the in vitro phenotyping results of non-B subtypes, and therefore it was deemed necessary to establish the applicability of HIVDR phenotypic testing of subtype C polymerase when a commercially available subtype B backbone is used. One hundred and fourteen HIV-1 subtype C samples were HIVDR phenotyped against 17 antiretroviral drugs using both subtype B and C backbones and showed a high level of concordance between the two backbone phenotypic resistance profiles (95.8%; 1590 of 1660 fold change comparisons). Natural assay variability was largely responsible for discordant results. Results confirmed that HIV-1 phenotypic reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug resistance test interpretation is independent of the virus backbone subtype. No conclusions could be made for protease inhibitor resistance since limited samples from 2nd line failure were available. Subsequently, the HIVDR genotypic and phenotypic results of the 114 patient samples were compared to determine whether genotyping is a viable alternative to phenotyping. Results showed a 92.3% concordance between genotyping and phenotyping of individual drug comparisons for a number of HIVDR profiles. Discrepancies were attributed to phenotypic assay variability in addition to the role of mutation mixtures, which impacted genotypic interpretations. Overall, HIVDR genotyping is a reliable tool to detect and interpret antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 subtype C infected patients, and can thus be used for clinical patient management. Once the accuracy of HIVDR genotyping was established, the development, validation and evaluation of a potential virological failure assay (ARTA-VFA) and a simplified HIVDR (ARTA-HIVDRultralight) assay was undertaken. A simplified and conceptually novel approach using a qualitative viral load assay with a pre-determined cut-off that gives a threshold above which virological failure (VF) could be confirmed and below which treatment success was likely, was tested. A real-time PCR (ARTA-VFA) assay was developed which involved the amplification of a short sequence of the HIV-1 LTR region from RNA extracted either from plasma and/or dried blood spots (DBS). The ARTA-VFA was tested on 409 patient samples,and successfully amplified samples from all major HIV-1 group M subtypes with equal specificity. The VF was qualitatively classified as a viral load >1000 RNA copies/ml in plasma samples, and >5000 RNA copies/ml in DBS samples. Comparative testing yielded accurate VF determination for therapy-switching in approximately 93% of clinical cases tested, compared to current gold standard quantitative viral load assays. A simplified HIVDR genotyping assay (ARTA-HIVDRultralight) targeting the region of RT harboring all major RT inhibitor resistance mutation positions, thus providing all relevant susceptibility data for first-line regimen failures was developed and assessed. The ARTAHIVDRultralight assay was designed to be practical, faster, and more affordable, show flexibility with respect to equipment (open platform), use DBS or plasma as starting material and amplify and sequence a smaller amplicon (RT). The assay performed well when compared to the in-house assay used in the laboratory at the time for both 212 plasma and 25 DBS samples, yielding identical mutations and subsequent resistant profiles. Furthermore, a theoretical in silico exercise to investigate the consequences of using 125,329 shortened RT genotype (ARTA-HIVDRultralight) as compared to full-length RT sequences showed >95% and >90% concordance when using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm and the virco®TYPE tool, respectively. Differences noted were minor and unlikely to have any impact on clinical decision-making. Overall, this study illustrated that the short RT sequences can be reliably used to generate HIVDR genotypes using the Stanford HIVdb and virco®TYPE algorithms and reduce sequencing costs substantially. A field evaluation using the ARTA-VFA and ARTA-HIVDRultralight on 288 clinical samples was conducted, showing that the accuracy and precision of both assays (using 248 plasma or 40 DBS sampling methods) compared well to the reference methodology, thereby extending access of testing to more remote settings.These assays were designed to either be used as a testing strategy of initially assessing VF,and once confirmed performing an HIVDR assay, or alternatively to be used separately as stand-alone, or within different laboratory tiers in resource limited settings. It is envisaged that the ARTA-VFA could be used in the middle laboratory tier, and if confirmatory, patient samples can be referred to a reference laboratory with the available infrastructure for HIVDR testing using the ARTA-HIVDRultralight. Lastly, an automated sequence analysis and editing software for use in correct base calling of nucleotide/mutation mixtures in HIVDR genotyping was validated on 1624 sequences. Compared to reference software, where interpretation is often operator dependent, this software performed extremely well, with minor discrepancies noted. The automated software can be used to reduce subjectivity, time taken for analysis which is often the rate-limiting step and thus improving the turn-around time and clinical relevance of HIVDR genotyping. Overall, the results obtained describe the validation of using HIVDR genotyping as an alternative tool to phenotyping, and the subsequent development and validation of simple, affordable, "open-platform" alternatives to currently used methods for virological failure monitoring, and accommodate a centralized approach to HIVDR with DBS testing in resource limited settings

    High-level cross-resistance to didanosine observed in South African children failing an abacavir- or stavudine-based 1st-line regimen.

    No full text
    The knowledge-base of emerging drug resistance profiles in children exposed to abacavir-based antiretroviral regimens in South Africa is very limited. This study investigated the suitability of didanosine-based 2nd-line regimens for children in the context of antiretroviral drug resistance patterns emerging after 1st-line virologic failure.A retrospective dataset of 354 antiretroviral drug resistant genotypes from children failing either abacavir (n = 81) or stavudine (n = 273) based 1st-line regimens, was analysed. Samples were sent to the HIV genotyping laboratory at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, for routine testing. Pol sequences were submitted to the Stanford HIV drug resistance database for genotypic predictions.Children were exposed to abacavir or stavudine-based 1st-line regimens for an average of 21 and 36 months, respectively. The frequency of reduced susceptibility to didanosine was substantial in the abacavir-exposed group (69.1%).This reduced susceptibility was commonly attributed to L74V/I (n = 44) and to a lesser extent K65R (n = 10) mutations. Didanosine resistance was observed in 43.2% of patients exposed to stavudine-based regimens. In contrast, most children remained susceptible to stavudine regardless of exposure to abacavir (77.8%) or stavudine (74.7%). At least 80% of children remained susceptible to zidovudine irrespective of stavudine or abacavir-exposure. The presence of the K65R mutation was more common after abacavir pressure (12.3% vs 1.8%).Analysis revealed that didanosine-based 2nd-line regimens have limitations for South African children, given the high frequency of mutations that confer cross-resistance to didanosine; especially after abacavir-exposure. This data has influenced South African paediatric treatment guidelines, which now recommend zidovudine-based 2nd-line regimens

    Performance and Logistical Challenges of Alternative HIV-1 Virological Monitoring Options in a Clinical Setting of Harare, Zimbabwe

    No full text
    We evaluated a low-cost virological failure assay (VFA) on plasma and dried blood spot (DBS) specimens from HIV-1 infected patients attending an HIV clinic in Harare. The results were compared to the performance of the ultrasensitive heat-denatured p24 assay (p24). The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test, version 2.0, served as the gold standard. Using a cutoff of 5,000 copies/mL, the plasma VFA had a sensitivity of 94.5% and specificity of 92.7% and was largely superior to the VFA on DBS (sensitivity = 61.9%; specificity = 99.0%) or to the p24 (sensitivity = 54.3%; specificity = 82.3%) when tested on 302 HIV treated and untreated patients. However, among the 202 long-term ART-exposed patients, the sensitivity of the VFA decreased to 72.7% and to 35.7% using a threshold of 5,000 and 1,000 RNA copies/mL, respectively. We show that the VFA (either on plasma or on DBS) and the p24 are not reliable to monitor long-term treated, HIV-1 infected patients. Moreover, achieving acceptable assay sensitivity using DBS proved technically difficult in a less-experienced laboratory. Importantly, the high level of virological suppression (93%) indicated that quality care focused on treatment adherence limits virological failure even when PCR-based viral load monitoring is not available

    High prevalence of the K65R mutation in HIV-1 subtype C infected patients failing tenofovir-based first-line regimens in South Africa.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND:Tenofovir (TDF) has replaced stavudine (d4T) as the preferred nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in first-line regimens in South Africa, but limited information is available on the resistance patterns that develop after the introduction of TDF. This study investigated the antiretroviral drug resistance patterns in South African HIV-1 subtype C-infected patients failing stavudine- (d4T) and tenofovir- (TDF) based first-line regimens and assess the suitability of TDF as the preferred first-line nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). METHODS:Resistance patterns of HIV-1 from 160 adult patients virologically failing TDF- (n = 80) and d4T- (n = 80) based first-line regimens were retrospectively analyzed. The pol gene was sequenced using an in-house protocol and mutations were analysed using the IAS-USA 2014 Drug Resistance Mutation list. RESULTS:Compared to d4T-exposed patients (n = 7), patients failing on a TDF-containing regimen (n = 43) were almost 5 times more likely to present with a K65R mutation (aRR 4.86 95% CI 2.29 - 10.34). Y115F was absent in the d4T group, and detected in 13.8% (n = 11) of TDF-exposed patients, p = 0.0007. Virus from 9 of the 11 patients (82.0%) who developed the Y115F mutation also developed K65R. Intermediate or high-level resistance to most NRTIs was common in the TDF-treatment group, but these patients twice more likely to remain susceptible to AZT as compared to those exposed to d4T (aRR 2.09 95% CI 1.13 - 3.90). CONCLUSION:The frequency of the TDF induced K65R mutation was higher in our setting compared to non-subtype C dominated countries. However, despite the higher frequency of cross-resistance to NRTIs, most patients remained susceptible to AZT, which is reflected in the South African treatment guidelines that recommend AZT as an essential component of second-line regimens

    Prevalence of resistance to protease inhibitors.

    No full text
    <p>Prevalence of susceptible (S, white), intermediate (I, grey) or high-level resistance (R, black) to PIs at failure of a PI-based (n = 93) regimen. Fifteen (15) children failing NNRTI-based regimens, with known prior exposure to PIs were included in this group. The numbers represent percentages. Abbreviations: IDV/r: boosted indinavir, TPV/r: boosted tipranavir, APV/r: boosted fosamprenavir, LPV/r: boosted lopinavir, SQV/r: boosted saquinavir, DRV/r: boosted darunavir, ATZ/r: boosted atazanavir, NFV/r: boosted nelfinavir.</p
    corecore