Health Status in Long-Term Survivors of Hepatoblastoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the health status of children cured from hepatoblastoma. Forty-five patients with hepatoblastoma treated between 1996–2014 were assessed. The recorded data included sex, age at diagnosis, disease stage, treatment methods, time since diagnosis, and the evaluation of health status domains which included performance status, growth development, hearing, cardiovascular, skeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, neurological, and hematological function. There were 30 boys and 15 girls. The age at diagnosis ranged from one month to 14 years (median one year). At the time of the health status evaluation, the youngest patient was 5.5 years old and the oldest was 21 years of age (median—10 years). All patients were treated according to the Childhood Liver Tumors Strategy Group—SIOPEL recommendations, though they were not active participants of the studies. The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 520 mg/m2 and 360 mg/m2 for doxorubicin. Thirty-six patients underwent partial hepatectomy, and nine total hepatectomy and liver transplantation. At a median of nine years from diagnosis, 68% of hepatoblastoma survivors had experienced at least one chronic health condition of any grade. The most frequent late complication was ototoxicity (28.8%), and the most serious were second malignancies (6.6%) and cardiomyopathy (4.4%). Conclusion: Survivors of hepatoblastoma are at risk for long-term complications. They require long-term monitoring for late effects

Acute liver failure in children-Is living donor liver transplantation justified?

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) has become an acceptable alternative to transplantation from deceased donors (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of LDLT in pediatric patients with ALF based on our center's experience.We enrolled 63 children (at our institution) with ALF who underwent liver transplantation between 1997 and 2016. Among them 24 (38%) underwent a LDLT and 39 (62%) received a DDLT. Retrospectively analyzed patient clinical data included: time lapse between qualification for transplantation and transplant surgery, graft characteristics, postoperative complications, long-term results post-transplantation, and living donor morbidity. Overall, we have made a comparison of clinical results between LDLT and DDLT groups.Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 182 months (median 109 months) for LDLT patients and 12 to 183 months (median 72 months) for DDLT patients. The median waiting time for a transplant was shorter in LDLT group than in DDLT group. There was not a single case of primary non-function (PNF) in the LDLT group and 20 out of 24 patients (83.3%) had good early graft function; 3 patients (12.5%) in the LDLT group died within 2 months of transplantation but there was no late mortality. In comparison, 4 out of 39 patients (10.2%) had PNF in DDLT group while 20 patients (51.2%) had good early graft function; 8 patients (20.5%) died early within 2 months and 2 patients (5.1%) died late after transplantation. The LDLT group had a shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) of 4 hours in comparison to 9.2 hours in the DDLT group (p<0.0001).LDLT is a lifesaving procedure for pediatric patients with ALF. Our experience showed that it may be performed with very good results, and with very low morbidity and no mortality among living donors when performed by experienced teams following strict procedures

Risk for Recurrence in Long-Term Follow-Up of Children after Liver Transplantation for Hepatoblastoma or Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results of liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric patients with unresectable hepatoblastoma (HB) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with special reference to the risk of tumor recurrence. We retrospectively analyzed data from 46 HB and 26 HCC patients who underwent LT between 1990 and 2022. In HCC patients, we compared outcomes depending on donor type. We evaluated the impact of a number of risk factors on recurrence-free survival after LT. Estimated patient survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was 82%, 73%, and 73% in the HB group and 79%, 75%, and 75% in the HCC group, respectively (p = 0.76). In the HCC group, living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT) provided similar patient survival (p = 0.09). Estimated recurrence-free survival in patients who had three or fewer risk factors was significantly better than in patients with more than three risk factors (p = 0.0001). Adequate patient selection is necessary when considering LT for primary liver tumors in children. The presence of more than three risk factors is associated with a very high risk of recurrence and indicates poor prognosis, whereas extrahepatic disease may be considered a contraindication for transplantation

Patients’ survival after LDLT and DDLT in the ALF group with the Kaplan-Meier comparison.

<p>Patients’ survival after LDLT and DDLT in the ALF group with the Kaplan-Meier comparison.</p

ABO compatibility and cold ischemia time (CIT)–comparison between living and deceased donor transplantation in ALF patients.

<p>ABO compatibility and cold ischemia time (CIT)–comparison between living and deceased donor transplantation in ALF patients.</p

Selected clinical data of LDLT and DDLT patients.

<p>Selected clinical data of LDLT and DDLT patients.</p

Graft survival after LDLT and DDLT in ALF groups as evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier comparison.

<p>Graft survival after LDLT and DDLT in ALF groups as evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier comparison.</p

Summary of outcomes of patients and grafts after LDLT and DDLT.

<p>Summary of outcomes of patients and grafts after LDLT and DDLT.</p