A clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and imatinib

Purpose: Cyclosporine A (CsA) and imatinib are both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates. Concomitant use after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) may therefore result in a pharmacokinetic interaction. Although case reports and a recent small study in children indeed suggested there is a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction, a larger study in adults is lacking. In this study, we assessed the presence and extent of this interaction in patients with CML or Ph+ ALL undergoing HSCT. Methods: From a large database containing data of all patients receiving HSCT in our center between 2005 and 2015, we selected 16 patients using this drug combination. The average dose-corrected CsA concentration was calculated before and after initiation of imatinib. Results: The average dose-corrected CsA concentration increased during imatinib use in all patients, on average by 94 % (p < 0.001). Based on measured drug con

Etanercept for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Background: Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is an important complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). High dose glucocorticosteroids, are currently recommended as first-line treatment for grade II-IV aGVHD resulting in overall complete responses (CR) in 40%-50% of patients. No standard second-line regimen has been established. Different options have been reported, including anti-TNFα antibodies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 15 patients with steroid-refractory (SR) aGVHD treated with etanercept at our institution. Patients were transplanted for a hematological malignancy and received either a myeloablative or a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen. Prophylaxis of GVHD consisted of cyclosporin A and mycophenolic acid. Results: Acute GVHD was diagnosed at a median of 61 days post-transplantation. All patients had grade III aGVHD of the gut. Second-line treatment with etanercept was started at a median of 13 days after initiation of first-line therapy. Overall response rate was 53%, with CR in 3 patients and PR in 5 patients. Median overall survival after initiation of treatment with etanercept was 66 days (range 5–267) for the entire group. Median overall survival was 99 days (range 47–267 days) for responders and 17 days (range 5–66 days) for non-responders (p<0.01). Nevertheless, all patients died. Causes of death were progressive GVHD in 7 patients (47%), infection in 6 patients (40%), cardiac death in 1 patient (6.7%) and relapse in 1 patient (6,7%). Conclusion: Second-line treatment with etanercept does induce responses in SR-aGVHD of the gut but appears to be associated with poor long-term survival even in responding patients

Converting cyclosporine A from intravenous to oral administration in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and the role of azole antifungals

Purpose: Cyclosporine A (CsA) is the most widely used immunosuppressive agent after a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although recommendations for CsA dose conversion from intravenous to oral administration differ from 1:1 to 1:3, most studies did not consider the role of azole antifungals as an important confounder. Therefore, we assess the optimal conversion rate of CsA from intravenous to oral administration in HSCT recipients, taking into account the concomitant use of azole antifungals. Methods: We retrospectively included patients from a large database of 483 patients who underwent a HSCT and received intravenous CsA as part of the conditioning regimen and peritransplant immunosuppression. All patients were converted from intravenous to oral administration in a 1:1 conversion rate. We collected for each patient three CsA trough concentrations during intravenous and oral administration, directly before and after conversion to oral administration. Results: We included 71 patients; 50 patients co-treated with fluconazole, 10 with voriconazole, and 11 without azole co-medication. In patients with voriconazole, the dose-corrected CsA concentration (CsA concentration divided by CsA dosage) was not different between intravenous and oral administration (2.6% difference, p = 0.754), suggesting a CsA oral bioavailability of nearly 100%. In patients with fluconazole and without azole co-medication, the dose-corrected CsA concentration was respectively 21.5% (p < 0.001) and 25.2% (p = 0.069) lower during oral administration. Conclusions: In patients with voriconazole, CsA should be converted 1:1 from intravenous to oral administration. In patients with fluconazole and without azole co-medication, a 1:1.3 substitution is advised to prevent subtherapeutic CsA concentrations

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in High-Risk Hematological Patients: A Phase II Study Focusing on the Mechanism of Graft Predominance

Immunobiology of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and immunotherapy of hematological disease