17 research outputs found
Phenotype in combination with genotype improves outcome prediction in acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children’s Oncology Group protocol AAML0531
Diagnostic biomarkers can be used to determine relapse risk in acute myeloid leukemia, and certain genetic aberrancies have prognostic relevance. A diagnostic immunophenotypic expression profile, which quantifies the amounts of distinct gene products, not just their presence or absence, was established in order to improve outcome prediction for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The immunophenotypic expression profile, which defines each patient’s leukemia as a location in 15-dimensional space, was generated for 769 patients enrolled in the Children’s Oncology Group AAML0531 protocol. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering grouped patients with similar immunophenotypic expression profiles into eleven patient cohorts, demonstrating high associations among phenotype, genotype, morphology, and outcome. Of 95 patients with inv(16), 79% segregated in Cluster A. Of 109 patients with t(8;21), 92% segregated in Clusters A and B. Of 152 patients with 11q23 alterations, 78% segregated in Clusters D, E, F, G, or H. For both inv(16) and 11q23 abnormalities, differential phenotypic expression identified patient groups with different survival characteristics (
CD74 is expressed in a subset of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients and is a promising target for therapy: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group
As curative therapies for pediatric AML remain elusive, identifying potential new treatment targets is vital. We assessed the cell surface expression of CD74, also known as the MHC-II invariant chain, by multidimensional flow cytometry in 973 patients enrolled in the Children’s Oncology Group AAML1031 clinical trial. 38% of pediatric AML patients expressed CD74 at any level and a comparison to normal hematopoietic cells revealed a subset with increased expression relative to normal myeloid progenitor cells. Pediatric AML patients expressing high intensity CD74 typically had an immature immunophenotype and an increased frequency of lymphoid antigen expression. Increased CD74 expression was associated with older patients with lower WBC and peripheral blood blast counts, and was enriched for t(8;21), trisomy 8, and CEBPA mutations. Overall, high CD74 expression was associated with low-risk status, however 26% of patients were allocated to high-risk protocol status and 5-year event free survival was 53%, indicating that a significant number of high expressing patients had poor outcomes. In vitro pre-clinical studies indicate that anti-CD74 therapy demonstrates efficacy against AML cells but has little impact on normal CD34+ cells. Together, we demonstrate that CD74 is expressed on a subset of pediatric AMLs at increased levels compared to normal hematopoietic cells and is a promising target for therapy in expressing patients. Given that nearly half of patients expressing CD74 at high levels experience an adverse event within 5 years, and the availability of CD74 targeting drugs, this represents a promising line of therapy worthy of additional investigation
Comprehensive molecular and clinical characterization of NUP98 fusions in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia
NUP98 fusions comprise a family of rare recurrent alterations in AML, associated with adverse outcomes. In order to define the underlying biology and clinical implications of this family of fusions, we performed comprehensive transcriptome, epigenome, and immunophenotypic profiling of 2,235 children and young adults with AML and identified 160 NUP98 rearrangements (7.2%), including 108 NUP98-NSD1 (4.8%), 32 NUP98-KDM5A (1.4%) and 20 NUP98-X cases (0.9%) with 13 different fusion partners. Fusion partners defined disease characteristics and biology; patients with NUP98-NSD1 or NUP98-KDM5A had distinct immunophenotypic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic profiles. Unlike the two most prevalent NUP98 fusions, NUP98-X variants are typically not cryptic. Furthermore, NUP98-X cases are associated with WT1 mutations, and have epigenomic profiles that resemble either NUP98-NSD1 or NUP98-KDM5A. Cooperating FLT3-ITD and WT1 mutations define NUP98-NSD1, and chromosome 13 aberrations are highly enriched in NUP98-KDM5A. Importantly, we demonstrate that NUP98 fusions portend dismal overall survival, with the noteworthy exception of patients bearing abnormal chromosome 13 (clinicaltrials gov. Identifiers: NCT00002798, NCT00070174, NCT00372593, NCT01371981).</p
Comprehensive molecular and clinical characterization of NUP98 fusions in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia
NUP98 fusions comprise a family of rare recurrent alterations in AML, associated with adverse outcomes. In order to define the underlying biology and clinical implications of this family of fusions, we performed comprehensive transcriptome, epigenome, and immunophenotypic profiling of 2,235 children and young adults with AML and identified 160 NUP98 rearrangements (7.2%), including 108 NUP98-NSD1 (4.8%), 32 NUP98-KDM5A (1.4%) and 20 NUP98-X cases (0.9%) with 13 different fusion partners. Fusion partners defined disease characteristics and biology; patients with NUP98-NSD1 or NUP98-KDM5A had distinct immunophenotypic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic profiles. Unlike the two most prevalent NUP98 fusions, NUP98-X variants are typically not cryptic. Furthermore, NUP98-X cases are associated with WT1 mutations, and have epigenomic profiles that resemble either NUP98-NSD1 or NUP98-KDM5A. Cooperating FLT3-ITD and WT1 mutations define NUP98-NSD1, and chromosome 13 aberrations are highly enriched in NUP98-KDM5A. Importantly, we demonstrate that NUP98 fusions portend dismal overall survival, with the noteworthy exception of patients bearing abnormal chromosome 13 (clinicaltrials gov. Identifiers: NCT00002798, NCT00070174, NCT00372593, NCT01371981).</p
Acute myeloid leukemia with RAM immunophenotype: a pediatric case with unusual morphologic features
The RAM immunophenotype has been recently described as a subtype of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) that is characterized clinically by extremely poor prognosis. We present a case of AML with RAM immunophenotype in a 5-year-old patient that resulted in poor outcome despite early hematopoietic cell transplant. We describe the unusual morphologic features that, along with the distinct immunophenotype, may provide initial diagnostic clues and further justify the classification of this AML variant as a rather distinct subtype
Multicenter prospective evaluation of diagnostic potential of flow cytometric aberrancies in myelodysplastic syndromes by the ELN iMDS flow working group
Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a diagnostic challenge. This prospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate pre-defined flow cytometric markers in the diagnostic work-up of MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Methods: Thousand six hundred and eighty-two patients with suspected MDS/CMML were analyzed by both cytomorphology according to WHO 2016 criteria and flow cytometry according to ELN recommendations. Flow cytometric readout was categorized ‘non-MDS’ (i.e. no signs of MDS/CMML and limited signs of MDS/CMML) and ‘in agreement with MDS’ (i.e., in agreement with MDS/CMML). Results: Flow cytometric readout categorized 60% of patients in agreement with MDS, 28% showed limited signs of MDS and 12% had no signs of MDS. In 81% of cases flow cytometric readouts and cytomorphologic diagnosis correlated. For high-risk MDS, the level of concordance was 92%. A total of 17 immunophenotypic aberrancies were found independently related to MDS/CMML in ≥1 of the subgroups of low-risk MDS, high-risk MDS, CMML. A cut-off of ≥3 of these aberrancies resulted in 80% agreement with cytomorphology (20% cases concordantly negative, 60% positive). Moreover, >3% myeloid progenitor cells were significantly associated with MDS (286/293 such cases, 98%). Conclusion: Data from this prospective multicenter study led to recognition of 17 immunophenotypic markers allowing to identify cases ‘in agreement with MDS’. Moreover, data emphasizes the clinical utility of immunophenotyping in MDS diagnostics, given the high concordance between cytomorphology and the flow cytometric readout. Results from the current study challenge the application of the cytomorphologically defined cut-off of 5% blasts for flow cytometry and rather suggest a 3% cut-off for the latter