Association of HbA1c and utilization of internal mammary arteries with wound infections in CABG

BackgroundDeep sternal wound infection (DSWI) remains a serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We herein aimed to stratify diabetic patients who underwent CABG using bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) for levels of glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and compare postoperative outcomes.MethodsBetween January 2010 and August 2020, 4,186 consecutive patients underwent isolated CABG at our center. In 3,229 patients, preoperative HbA1c levels were available. Primary endpoints were wound healing disorder (WHD), DSWI, and 30-day mortality. Patients were stratified according to preoperative HbA1c levels. Patients were further divided into subgroups according to utilization of BIMA.ResultsAfter adjustment, no differences in mortality and stroke rates were seen between group 1 (HbA1c < 6.5%) vs. group 2 (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%). WHD was more frequent in group 2 [2.8 vs. 5.6%; adjusted p = 0.002; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.853 (1.243–2.711)] but not DSWI [1.0 vs. 1.5%; adjusted p = 0.543; adjusted OR, 1.247 (0.612–2.5409)]. BIMA use showed a higher rate of WHD [no BIMA: 3.0%; BIMA: 7.7%; adjusted p = 0.002; adjusted OR, 4.766 (1.747–13.002)] but not DSWI [no BIMA: 1.1%; BIMA: 1.8%; adjusted p = 0.615; adjusted OR, 1.591 (0.260–9.749)] in patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.ConclusionsIntraoperative utilization of BIMA is not connected with an increase of DSWI but higher rates of WHD in patients with poor diabetic status and HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. Therefore, application of BIMA should be taken into consideration even in patients with poor diabetic status, while identification of special subsets of patients who are at particular high risk for DSWI is of paramount importance to prevent this serious complication

Case-matched comparison of cardiovascular outcome in Loeys-Dietz syndrome versus Marfan syndrome

Background: Pathogenic variants in TGFBR1, TGFBR2 and SMAD3 genes cause Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and pathogenic variants in FBN1 cause Marfan syndrome. Despite their similar phenotypes, both syndromes may have different cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Three expert centers performed a case-matched comparison of cardiovascular outcomes. The Loeys-Dietz group comprised 43 men and 40 women with a mean age of 34 +/- 18 years. Twenty-six individuals had pathogenic variants in TGFBR1, 40 in TGFBR2, and 17 in SMAD3. For case-matched comparison we used 83 age and sex-frequency matched individuals with Marfan syndrome. Results: In Loeys-Dietz compared to Marfan syndrome, a patent ductus arteriosus (p = 0.014) was more prevalent, the craniofacial score was higher (p < 0.001), the systemic score lower (p < 0.001), and mitral valve prolapse less frequent (p = 0.003). Mean survival for Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndrome was similar (75 +/- 3 versus 73 +/- 2 years; p = 0.811). Cardiovascular outcome was comparable between Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndrome, including mean freedom from proximal aortic surgery (53 +/- 4 versus 48 +/- 3 years; p = 0.589), distal aortic repair (72 +/- 3 versus 67 +/- 2 years; p = 0.777), mitral valve surgery (75 +/- 4 versus 65 +/- 3 years; p = 0.108), and reintervention (20 +/- 3 versus 14 +/- 2 years; p = 0.112). In Loeys-Dietz syndrome, lower age at initial presentation predicted proximal aortic surgery (HR = 0.748; p < 0.001), where receiver operating characteristic analysis identified <= 33.5 years with increased risk. In addition, increased aortic sinus diameters (HR = 6.502; p = 0.001), and higher systemic score points at least marginally (HR = 1.175; p = 0.065) related to proximal aortic surgery in Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Conclusions: Cardiovascular outcome of Loeys-Dietz syndrome was comparable to Marfan syndrome, but the severity of systemic manifestations was a predictor of proximal aortic surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery: Where Do We Stand?

&lt;jats:title&gt;Abstract&lt;/jats:title&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Purpose of Review&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal and multi-professional strategies to enhance postoperative convalescence and thereby reduce the length of hospital stay and hospital-associated complications. This review provides an up-to-date overview about basic principles of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, their transfer into cardiac surgery, and their current state of evidence. It is supposed to offer clinical implications for further adaptations and implementations of such protocols in cardiac surgery.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Recent Findings&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;ERAS protocols are a story of success in numerous surgical disciplines and led to a paradigm shift in perioperative care and the establishment of ERAS Cardiac Society, a non-profit organization that provides evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for further development of enhanced recovery protocols, trying to harmonize the many existing efforts of individual approaches for cardiac surgery.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Summary&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;Promising results from comprehensive ERAS protocols in cardiac surgery emerged. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of high-quality data about holistic approaches in cardiac surgery and further efforts need to be promoted.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt

First in Human Implantation of the Thoracoflo Graft: A New Hybrid Device for Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic RepairWhat this paper adds

Introduction: Despite a high rate of success when performed in specialised centres, current techniques for thoraco-abdominal aortic repair are associated with serious complications. The problem of spinal cord ischaemia remains unsolved. Surgical technique: The new hybrid graft for thoraco-abdominal aortic repair was developed based on the frozen elephant trunk principle. The device consists of a proximal stent graft for transabdominal retrograde delivery to the descending thoracic aorta, combined with a distal six branched abdominal device for open aortic repair. An additional seventh branch is provided for possible lumbar artery re-implantation. Because the stent graft is implanted via a transabdominal approach, it avoids the need for thoracotomy and extracorporeal circulation. A 56 year old patient with Loeys–Dietz syndrome was placed in a supine position. The aorto-iliac axis was exposed via a midline transperitoneal approach. Following an end to side anastomosis of the iliac branch to the left common iliac artery, the stent graft portion was inserted into the thoracic aorta via the coeliac trunk ostium. After stent implantation and graft de-airing by needle puncture, retrograde blood flow to the abdominal aortic segment, and the lumbar and visceral arteries was established via the end to side iliac anastomosis creating an extra-anatomic bypass. Subsequently, the visceral and renal arteries were anastomosed to the branches. Finally, the aorta was opened and surgical graft attached via the collar. The reconstruction ended with end to end anastomoses of both common iliac arteries to the graft branches. Discussion: The first and successful implantation of the new Thoracoflo hybrid device via a novel surgical technique is reported, eliminating the need for thoracotomy and extracorporeal circulation for thoraco-abdominal aortic repair

The impact of a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery.

BackgroundAn enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal and multi-professional strategy aiming to accelerate postoperative convalescence. Pre-, intra- and postoperative measures might furthermore reduce postoperative complications and hospital length of stay (LOS) in a cost-effective way. We hypothesized that our unique ERAS protocol leads to shorter stays on the intensive care unit (ICU) and a quicker discharge without compromising patient safety.MethodsThis retrospective single center cohort study compares data of n = 101 patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery receiving a comprehensive ERAS protocol and n = 111 patients receiving routine care. Hierarchically ordered primary endpoints are postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and ICU LOS.ResultsPatients risk profiles and disease characteristics were comparably similar. Age was relevantly different between the groups (56 (17) vs. 57.5 (13) years, p = 0.015) and therefore adjusted. Postoperative LOS was significantly lower in ERAS group (6 (2) days vs. 7 (1) days, pConclusionThe ERAS protocol for minimally invasive heart valve surgery is safe and feasible in an elective setting and leads to a quicker hospital discharge without compromising patient safety. However, further investigation in a randomized setting is needed

Pre-surgery optimization of patients' expectations to improve outcome in heart surgery: Study protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center PSY-HEART-II trial

The PSY-HEART-I trial indicated that a brief expectation-focused intervention prior to heart surgery improves disability and quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, to investigate the clinical utility of such an intervention, a large multi-center trial is needed to generalize the results and their implications for the health care system. The PSY-HEART-II study aims to examine whether a preoperative psychological intervention targeting patients' expectations (EXPECT) can improve outcomes 6 months after CABG (with or without heart valve replacement). EXPECT will be compared to Standard of Care (SOC) and an intervention providing emotional support without targeting expectations (SUPPORT). In a 3-arm multi-center randomized, controlled, prospective trial (RCT), N = 567 patients scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC and EXPECT or SOC and SUPPORT. Patients will be randomized with a fixed unbalanced ratio of 3:3:1 (EXPECT: SUPPORT: SOC) to compare EXPECT to SOC and EXPECT to SUPPORT. Both psychological interventions consist of 2 in-person sessions (a 50 minute), 2 phone consultations (a 20 minute) during the week prior to surgery, and 1 booster phone consultation post-surgery 6 weeks later. Assessment will occur at baseline approx. 3-10 days before surgery, preoperatively the day before surgery, 4-6 days later, and 6 months after surgery. The study's primary end point will be patients' illness-related disability 6 months after surger y. Secondar y outcomes will be patients' expectations, subjective illness beliefs, quality of life, length of hospital stay and blood sample parameters (eg, inflammatory parameters such as IL-6, IL-8, CRP). This large multi-center trial has the potential to corroborate and generalize the promising results of the PSY-HEART-I trial for routine care of cardiac surgery patients, and to stimulate revisions of treatment guidelines in heart surgery. (Am Heart J 2022;254:1-11.