Hospitalization at the end of life in patients with multiple myeloma

A grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.Background Despite advances in treatment, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Further research investigating where MM patients die and characterization of end-of-life hospitalizations is needed. Methods We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to explore the hospitalization burden of MM patients at the end of their lives. Results The percent of patients dying in the hospital as a percent of overall MM deaths ranged from 54% in 2002 to 41.4% in 2017 (p < 0.01). Blood transfusions were received in 32.7% of these hospitalizations and infections were present in 47.8% of patients. Palliative care and/or hospice consultations ranged from 5.3% in 2002 to 31.4% in 2017 (p < 0.01). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that patients with MM dying in the hospital have a significant requirement for blood transfusions and have a high infection burden. We also show that palliative care and hospice involvement at the end of life has increased over time but remains low, and that ultimately, inpatient mortality has decreased over time, but MM patients die in the hospital at a higher rate than the general population

Lenalidomide after Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Data are lacking on whether lenalidomide maintenance therapy prolongs the time to disease progression after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Quality of control groups in randomised trials of multiple myeloma enrolling in the USA: a systematic review.

To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the quality of control groups in randomised controlled trials of multiple myeloma. We aimed to do a systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple myeloma to ascertain the quality of the control groups used. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and CinicalTrials.gov were searched for articles of randomised controlled trials of multiple myeloma based in the USA that initiated participant enrolment between Jan 1, 2010, and June 30, 2020. A control group regimen was considered to be inferior if a previous randomised controlled trial had shown an improved progression-free survival versus the control group before enrolment. Of 49 identified randomised controlled trials, seven (14%) began enrolling patients into inferior control groups after an existing superior regimen to the control had already been published. Nine (18%) of the 49 trials continued enrolment on substandard control groups after data emerged during the study enrolment period. The median time that newer data emerged regarding inferiority of the control group from the time a trial first enrolled a patient was 13 months (IQR 8-29 months). 12 (75%) of these 16 randomised controlled trials are published, and nine (75%) of the 12 published trials had overlapping investigators with trials that had previously shown the inferiority of the control group being used. Greater scrutiny on the quality of control groups in randomised controlled trials of multiple myeloma is needed