Gochlear implants from model to patients

Cochlear implants (CI) are by now an accepted form of rehabilitation for profoundly deaf patients. CI users regain part of their hearing by direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. With modern cochlear implants most users are able to achieve open-set speech understanding and are able to use the telephone. There are, however, still a lot of unanswered questions regarding the optimal design, stimulation paradigms, fitting methods and objective measurements. With the development of a realistic computer model of the implanted cochlea, as described in this thesis, these questions are analyzed from a fundamental perspective. This realistic model enables the analysis of clinical devices and gives insight in discrepancies between human and animal results. Insights gained from the model are used to improve clinical practice. Based on the model outcomes presented the characteristics of an improved electrode design were defined, and finally tested in a temporal bone study.UBL - phd migration 201

Residual hearing affects contralateral routing of signals in cochlear implant users

Introduction: Contralateral routing of signals (CROS) can be used to eliminate the head shadow effect. In unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, CROS can be achieved with placement of a microphone on the contralateral ear, with the signal streamed to the CI ear. CROS was originally developed for unilateral CI users without any residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear. However, the criteria for implantation are becoming progressively looser, and the nonimplanted ear can have substantial residual hearing. In this study, we assessed how residual hearing in the contralateral ear influences CROS effectiveness in unilateral CI users. Methods: In a group of unilateral CI users (N = 17) with varying amounts of residual hearing, we deployed free-field speech tests to determine the effects of CROS on the speech reception threshold (SRT) in amplitude-modulated noise. We compared 2 spatial configurations: (1) speech presented to the CROS ear and noise to the CI ear (SCROSNCI) and (2) the reverse (SCINCROS). Results: Compared with the use of CI only, CROS improved the SRT by 6.4 dB on average in the SCROSNCI configuration. In the SCINCROS configuration, however, CROS deteriorated the SRT by 8.4 dB. The benefit and disadvantage of CROS both decreased significantly with the amount of residual hearing. Conclusion: CROS users need careful instructions about the potential disadvantage when listening in conditions where the CROS ear mainly receives noise, especially if they have residual hearing in the contralateral ear. The CROS device should be turned off when it is on the noise side (SCINCROS). CI users with residual hearing in the CROS ear also should understand that contralateral amplification (i.e., a bimodal hearing solution) will yield better results than a CROS device. Unilateral CI users with no functional contralateral hearing should be considered the primary target population for a CROS device.Disorders of the head and nec

The temporal fine structure of background noise determines the benefit of bimodal hearing for recognizing speech

Cochlear implant (CI) users have more difficulty understanding speech in temporally modulated noise than in steady-state (SS) noise. This is thought to be caused by the limited low-frequency information that CIs provide, as well as by the envelope coding in CIs that discards the temporal fine structure (TFS). Contralateral amplification with a hearing aid, referred to as bimodal hearing, can potentially provide CI users with TFS cues to complement the envelope cues provided by the CI signal. In this study, we investigated whether the use of a CI alone provides access to only envelope cues and whether acoustic amplification can provide additional access to TFS cues. To this end, we evaluated speech recognition in bimodal listeners, using SS noise and two amplitude-modulated noise types, namely babble noise and amplitude-modulated steady-state (AMSS) noise. We hypothesized that speech recognition in noise depends on the envelope of the noise, but not on its TFS when listening with a CI. Secondly, we hypothesized that the amount of benefit gained by the addition of a contralateral hearing aid depends on both the envelope and TFS of the noise. The two amplitude-modulated noise types decreased speech recognition more effectively than SS noise. Against expectations, however, we found that babble noise decreased speech recognition more effectively than AMSS noise in the CI-only condition. Therefore, we rejected our hypothesis that TFS is not available to CI users. In line with expectations, we found that the bimodal benefit was highest in babble noise. However, there was no significant difference between the bimodal benefit obtained in SS and AMSS noise. Our results suggest that a CI alone can provide TFS cues and that bimodal benefits in noise depend on TFS, but not on the envelope of the noise.Disorders of the head and nec

Learning Effects in Psychophysical Tests of Spectral and Temporal Resolution

Disorders of the head and nec

An iterative deconvolution model to extract the temporal firing properties of the auditory nerve fibers in human eCAPs

The electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) has been widely studied for its clinical value for the evaluation of the surviving auditory nerve (AN) cells. However, many unknowns remain about the temporal firing properties of the AN fibers that underlie the eCAP in CI recipients. These temporal properties may contain valuable information about the condition of the AN. Here, we propose an iterative deconvolution model for estimating the human evoked unitary response (UR) and for extracting the compound discharge latency distribution (CDLD) from eCAP recordings, under the assumption that all AN fibers have the same UR. In this model, an eCAP is modeled by convolving a parameterized UR and a parameterized CDLD model. Both the UR and CDLD are optimized with an iterative deconvolution fitting error minimization routine to minimize the error between the modeled eCAP and the recorded eCAP.This method first estimates the human UR from eCAP recordings. The human eCAP is unknown at the time of this writing. The UR is subsequently used to extract the underlying temporal neural excitation pattern (the CDLD) that reflects the contributions from individual AN fibers in human eCAPs.By calculating the CDLD, the synchronicity of AN fibers can be evaluated. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.Disorders of the head and nec

Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor

A multi-center self-assessment survey was conducted to evaluate patient satisfaction with the Advanced Bionics Neptune™ waterproof sound processor used with the AquaMic™ totally submersible microphone. Subjective satisfaction with the different Neptune™ wearing options, comfort, ease of use, sound quality and use of the processor in a range of active and water related situations were assessed for 23 adults and 73 children, using an online and paper based questionnaire. Upgraded subjects compared their previous processor to the Neptune™. The Neptune™ was most popular for use in general sports and in the pool. Subjects were satisfied with the sound quality of the sound processor outside and under water and following submersion. Seventy-eight percent of subjects rated waterproofness as being very useful and 83% of the newly implanted subjects selected waterproofness as one of the reasons why they chose the Neptune™ processor. Providing a waterproof sound processor is considered by cochlear implant recipients to be useful and important and is a factor in their processor choice. Subjects reported that they were satisfied with the Neptune™ sound quality, ease of use and different wearing options