43 research outputs found

    Dataset for worldwide survey of cerebrospinal total protein upper reference values

    No full text
    This article reports data pertaining to a worldwide web-based survey referenced in the publication “Adult CSF Total Protein: Higher upper reference limits should be considered worldwide ” (P.R. Bourque, et al., 2019). This survey was distributed to corresponding authors of the journal Neurology and the Journal of neurological sciences for the period of Jan–Dec 2017. The response rate was 36.9%. Additional results were collated through networking and national associations. There were 473 unique responses from clinical hospital laboratories in 69 countries: North America 178, South America 26, Europe 139, Africa 20, Asia 102 and Oceania 8. The upper reference limit for cerebrospinal fluid total protein ranged from 0.2 g/L to 0.8 g/L. 86.8% of the survey responses were 0.45 g/L or less. Data is presented separately for tertiary/academic and non-university/community centers

    The characteristics of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in patients with and without diabetes--an observational study.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine whether the clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic classification of nerve injury, and response to treatment differed in patients diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) with and without diabetes. METHODS: CIDP patients with diabetes (CIDP+DM) (n = 67) and without diabetes (CIDP-DM) (n = 67) underwent clinical examination and nerve conduction studies (NCS). CIDP-DM patients were selected using age and gender matching with the existing CIDP+DM cohort. Patients treated with immunotherapies were classified as responders (R) (n = 46) or non-responders (NR) (n = 54) based on clinical response to treatment. The groups were compared using analysis of variance, contingency tables and Kruskal-Wallis analyses. RESULTS: CIDP+DM subjects had more severe neuropathy based on higher lower limb vibration potential thresholds (VPT)(p = 0.004), higher Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) (p = 0.0009), more proximal weakness (p = 0.03), more gait abnormality (p = 0.03) and more abnormal NCS. CIDP+DM subjects had more abnormal sural NCS with lower sural sensory nerve action potential amplitudes (2.4±3.0 ”V, 6.6±6.0 ”V, p<0.0001) and slower sural nerve conduction velocities (38.6±5.4 m/s, 41.0±5.3 m/s, p = 0.04). CIDP-DM subjects were more likely to receive immune therapies (93% vs 57%, p = <0.0001), despite no significant differences in treatment responder rates (p = 0.71). Patients who responded to therapy had shorter duration of CIDP than non-responders (8.0±6.0 y vs 11.9±7.6 y, p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: The clinical phenotype and electrophysiological profile of CIDP patients differs according to the presence or absence of diabetes. Despite CIDP+DM patients having more severe clinical and electrophysiological neuropathy, they are less likely to receive disease-modifying/specific therapy, yet have similar response rates to treatment as those without diabetes. Specifically, the duration of neuropathy - not diabetes status - was associated with treatment response

    Measurement of cooling detection thresholds for identification of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Compared to recently-studied novel morphological measures, conventional small nerve fiber functional tests have not been systematically studied for identification of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP). We aimed to determine and compare the diagnostic performance of cooling detection thresholds (CDT) in a cross-sectional type 1 diabetes cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 136 subjects with type 1 diabetes and 52 healthy volunteers underwent clinical and electrophysiological examination for DSP classification concomitantly with the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) and three small fiber function tests: CDT, heart rate variability (HRV), and laser doppler imaging of axon-mediated neurogenic flare responses to cutaneous heating (LDIFLARE). Area under the curve (AUC) and optimal thresholds were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the type 1 diabetes cohort. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetes subjects were 42±17 years of age with mean HbA1c 7.9±1.7%. Fifty-nine (45%) met the case definition for DSP. CDT values were lowest in cases with DSP (18.3±8.4°C) compared to controls without DSP (28.4±3.5°C) and to healthy volunteers (29.6±1.8°C; p-value for both comparisons<0.0001). AUCCDT was 0.863 which was similar to AUCTCNS (0.858, p = 0.24) and AUCHRV (0.788, p = 0.05), but exceeded AUCLDIFLARE (0.750, p = 0.001). The threshold of <25.1°C was equivalent to the lower bound of the healthy volunteer 95% distribution [25.1, 30.8°C] and performed with 83% sensitivity and 82% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Akin to novel small fiber morphological measures, CDT is a functional test that identifies DSP with very good diagnostic performance. These findings support further research that revisits the role of CDT in early DSP detection

    Treatment Responsiveness in CIDP Patients with Diabetes Is Associated with Higher Degrees of Demyelination.

    No full text
    Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is one of several chronic treatable acquired demyelinating neuropathies.To explore the association between the degree of demyelination in CIDP, and treatment responsiveness.A retrospective chart review of CIDP subjects assessed between 1997 and 2013 was performed to compare treatment responsiveness using different sets of criteria.99 CIDP patients were included, 34 with diabetes mellitus (DM). Treatment responsiveness was higher in CIDP-DM fulfilling 1 or more EFNS/PNS criteria, (63% vs. 31%, p = 0.03), and in CIDP+DM fulfilling 2 or more criteria (89% vs. 36%, p = 0.01). Nonetheless, treatment responsiveness in CIDP+DM had the highest odds ratio (3.73, p = 0.01). Similar results were also shown in simplified uniform study criteria, with 10% cut off values for CIDP-DM, compared to 30% for CIDP+DM.In CIDP+DM, higher degrees of demyelination are associated with treatment responsiveness, implying the need to adjust current criteria in these patients

    Clinical and electrodiagnostic features of 67 CIDP-DM and 67 CIDP+DM subjects.

    No full text
    <p>Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated.</p><p>Differences in categorical variables were assessed in three-group comparisons using the χ<sup>2</sup>-test, while differences in continuous variables were assessed using the ANOVA except in the case of TCNS in which the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied.</p><p>*The mean age for the 134 CIDP-DM and CIDP+DM subjects was 65.8±13.5 years.</p>†<p>Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) is a clinical indicator of the severity of neuropathy, with 0–4, 5–8, and ≄9 indicating no, mild, and moderate to severe neuropathy. Values less than 5 are normal. For the deep tendon reflex (DTR) segment of the TCNS, the normal value is 0. For TCNS, median and interquartile range (IQR) are shown and IQR are compared.</p>‡<p>The mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, indicating the percentage of haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub>, for 71 of the 134 CIDP-DM and CIDP+DM subjects was 7.1±1.9%.</p>§<p>Below the NCS mean parameter values, the range for that parameter is shown in brackets.</p><p>BMI = body mass index; DM = diabetes mellitus; PNP = polyneuropathy; VPT = vibration perception threshold; DTR = deep tendon reflexes of the lower limb; NR = non-recordable.</p><p><b>„ Bonferroni corrected p-value for significance = 0.001.</b></p

    Treatment details of 67 CIDP-DM and 67 CIDP+DM subjects.

    No full text
    <p>Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated.</p><p>Differences in categorical variables were assessed in three-group comparisons using the χ<sup>2</sup>-test, while differences in continuous variables were assessed using the ANOVA.</p><p>*Below the number of treatment mean values, the range for that treatment number is shown in brackets.</p><p>CIDP = chronic immune demyelinating polyneuropathy; DM = diabetes mellitus; IVIG = intravenous immunoglobulin; PLEX = plasma exchange; NCS = nerve conduction studies.</p><p><b>„ Bonferroni corrected p-value for significance = 0.003.</b></p
    corecore