First isolation of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 from a patient with severe persistent diarrhoea in Hungary

A recent Supplement to Clinical Microbiology and Infection entitled ‘Infection control measures to limit the spread of C. difficile’ pointed out that the incidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) has been increasing worldwide, and stressed the importance of research in the fields of epidemiology and infection control [1]. Since 2003, one of the main causes of the increasing prevalence of CDAD has been claimed to be the emergence of PCR ribotype 027/NAP1, which has caused epidemics in North America, the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium and France. The presence of PCR ribotype 027 in Austria, Japan, Ireland, Germany and Switzerland has also been reported recently [2,3]. The majority of publications have emphasized that the presence of this strain is usually associated with more severe symptoms and signs than those associated with the other more common toxinpositive strains [4,5]. Whereas PCR ribotype 027 was present in the population earlier, the majority of the historic strains were fluoroquinolone sensitive [6]. The overuse of antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones may lead to the selection and emergence of resistant strains, and may contribute to the spread of PCR ribotype 027, which is usually resistant to erythromycin. Here, the Eastern European spread of C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 is reported

Population policies and education: exploring the contradictions of neo-liberal globalisation

The world is increasingly characterised by profound income, health and social inequalities (Appadurai, 2000). In recent decades development initiatives aimed at reducing these inequalities have been situated in a context of increasing globalisation with a dominant neo-liberal economic orthodoxy. This paper argues that neo-liberal globalisation contains inherent contradictions regarding choice and uniformity. This is illustrated in this paper through an exploration of the impact of neo-liberal globalisation on population policies and programmes. The dominant neo-liberal economic ideology that has influenced development over the last few decades has often led to alternative global visions being overlooked. Many current population and development debates are characterised by polarised arguments with strongly opposing aims and views. This raises the challenge of finding alternatives situated in more middle ground that both identify and promote the socially positive elements of neo-liberalism and state intervention, but also to limit their worst excesses within the population field and more broadly. This paper concludes with a discussion outling the positive nature of middle ground and other possible alternatives