Creating a unique, multi-stakeholder paediatric oncology platform to improve drug development for children and adolescents with cancer

Seven years after the launch of the European Paediatric Medicine Regulation, limited progress in paediatric oncology drug development remains a major concern amongst stakeholders – academics, industry, regulatory authorities, parents, patients and caregivers. Restricted increases in early phase paediatric oncology trials, legal requirements and regulatory pressure to propose early Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs), missed opportunities to explore new drugs potentially relevant for paediatric malignancies, lack of innovative trial designs and no new incentives to develop drugs against specific paediatric targets are some unmet needs. Better access to new anti-cancer drugs for paediatric clinical studies and improved collaboration between stakeholders are essential. The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF), previously Biotherapy Development Association (BDA), with Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Consortium (ITCC), European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) and European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents (ENCCA) has created a unique Paediatric Oncology Platform, involving multiple stakeholders and the European Union (EU) Commission, with an urgent remit to improve paediatric oncology drug development. The Paediatric Oncology Platform proposes to recommend immediate changes in the implementation of the Regulation and set the framework for its 2017 revision; initiatives to incentivise drug development against specific paediatric oncology targets, and repositioning of drugs not developed in adults. Underpinning these changes is a strategy for mechanism of action and biology driven selection and prioritisation of potential paediatric indications rather than the current process based on adult cancer indications. Pre-competitive research and drug prioritisation, early portfolio evaluation, cross-industry cooperation and multi-compound/sponsor trials are being explored, from which guidance for innovative trial designs will be provided

Transplantation-Related Mortality, Graft Failure, and Survival after Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in 100 Consecutive Pediatric Recipients

AbstractAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning is associated with a 10%-40% risk of day +100 transplantation-related mortality (TRM). We evaluated the feasibility and safety of reduced-toxicity conditioning and allo-HSCT in 100 consecutive children and adolescent recipients (mean age, 9.2 ± 6.8 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 1278 ± 1042 days. Fifty patients had malignant disease. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 18 days, and the median time to platelet recovery was 43 days. Median donor chimerism in engrafted patients was 98% on day +100 and 98% on day +365. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1%-27.9%), and that of chronic GVHD was 13.5% (95% CI, 6.6%-20.4%). TRM was 3% (95% CI, 0%-6.4%) by day +100 and 13.6% (95% CI, 6.7%-20.5%) for the entire study period. The incidence of primary graft failure (PGF) was 16% overall, 31.4% after umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT), and 0% after allo-HSCT with matched unrelated or matched sibling donors (P < .0001). The incidence of PGF in UCBT recipients was 46.7% (14 of 30) in chemotherapy-naive recipients, versus 9.5% (2 of 21) in non–chemotherapy-naive recipients (P = .019). Five-year event-free survival was 59.5% ± 5%, and 5-year overall survival was 72.9% ± 5%. Only PGF and poor-risk disease status were significantly associated with decreased overall survival (P = .03). Reduced-toxicity conditioning allo-HSCT in pediatric recipients is associated with low TRM; however, chemotherapy-naive UCBT recipients have a significantly higher incidence of PGF