Anti-Ro52 antibodies positivity in antisynthetase syndrome: a single centre cohort study

Objectives: Although antisynthetase antibodies (ARS) are the established markers of the so-called antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD), in these patients the concomitant positivity of anti-Ro52 antibodies, reported in up to the 50% of cases, is not rare. Several studies focused on the effect of different ARS specificities on the evolution of ASSD, the most recent showing no effects. On the contrary, the role of co-occurring anti-Ro52 antibodies in ASSD is still debated. We investigated the potential of anti-Ro52 antibodies in identifying a clinical phenotype of ASSD or influencing prognosis, irrespectively to the underlying ARS specificity. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical, imaging and laboratory characteristics, therapeutic approaches and outcome at baseline and at last follow-up, of 60 ASSD patients progressively enrolled at our Hospital. Results: We identified 34 anti-Ro+ and 26 anti-Ro- ASSD patients. Classic triad prevalence at baseline was similar between the two groups, whereas interstitial lung disease (ILD) (p value=0.01) and myositis (p value=0.03) were significantly more prevalent in anti-Ro52+ and in anti-Ro52- patients at last follow up, respectively. No differences in therapeutic approaches, oxygen need and ILD patterns were observed. Overall mortality was 25% (15 subjects). No differences in mortality, overall and disease related, between anti-Ro52+ and anti-Ro52- patients were observed (p value=0.764), despite the more frequent ILD occurrence in anti-Ro52+ patients. Survival curves were not different at any time point (Log-rank test, p value 0.98). Conclusions: Anti-Ro52 antibodies affect time course and clinical characteristics of ASSD. Although ILD is significantly more associated to anti-Ro52 antibodies, no difference in mortality was observed compared to anti-Ro52 negative patients

Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression and COVID-19: Results from a Multidisciplinary Cohort of Patients in Northern Italy

The role of immunosuppression in SARS-CoV-2-related disease (COVID-19) is a matter of debate. We here describe the course and the outcome of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients undergoing treatment with calcineurin inhibitors. In this monocentric cohort study, data were collected from the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy up to April 28th 2020. Patients were followed at our hospital for solid organ transplantation or systemic rheumatic disorders (RMDs) and were on calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based therapy. Selected patients were referred from the North of Italy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical course of COVID-19 in this setting. We evaluated 385 consecutive patients (220 males, 57%; median age 61 years, IQR 48-69); 331 (86%) received solid organ transplantation and 54 (14%) had a RMD. CNIs were the only immunosuppressant administered in 47 patients (12%). We identified 14 (4%) COVID-19 patients, all transplanted, mainly presenting with fever (86%) and diarrhea (71%). Twelve patients were hospitalized and two of them died, both with severe comorbidities. No patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome or infectious complications. The surviving 10 patients are now fully recovered. The clinical course of COVID-19 patients on CNIs is generally mild, and the risk of superinfection seems low

Established rheumatoid arthritis. The pathogenic aspects.

The development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), at least in its autoantibody-positive subset, evolves through a series of events starting well before the appearance of synovitis. The distinction between 'early' and 'established' RA is, therefore, an evolving concept. In routine practice, however, the management of RA still starts with the occurrence of clinically detectable synovitis. As such, the synovial membrane remains a major target for the exploitation of possible stage-specific drivers of the disease. The recognition of a 'window of opportunity', in which treatment is more likely to succeed, raises the hypothesis that there might be a period in which the biological processes of RA are less mature and potentially reversible. The present review aims to provide a general picture of the modifications occurring in RA synovium, analysing the contribution of both infiltrating immune cells and stromal cells. When available, differences between early and established RA will be discussed

Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: one year in review 2023

: In the past 20 years, earlier diagnosis and more intensive management have considerably improved the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with milder disease course achieved in particular in seropositive patients. In contrast, seronegative RA has remained largely neglected, and continues to be surrounded by uncertainties regarding its correct diagnosis, clinical phenotype, optimal treatment strategies and relevant outcomes.The purpose of this review is to summarise new insights about the pathogenic, clinical and prognostic peculiarities of seronegative RA that emerged during 2022, and that make this disease subset at least partially different from its seropositive counterpart

Janus kinase inhibitors effectively improve pain across different disease activity states in rheumatoid arthritis

: Pain remains one of the most difficult-to-treat domains in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In clinical trials, the Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have demonstrated good efficacy in pain relief. Aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of JAKis in improving pain in patients with RA in different states of baseline disease activity. A monocentric prospective cohort of 181 RA patients starting treatment with JAKis was studied. Pain was evaluated on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinically meaningful improvements over 24 weeks were defined as follows: proportion of patients achieving ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% pain relief, and remaining pain ≤ 20 or ≤ 10 mm. Results were analysed after stratification for baseline inflammatory activity; patients with swollen joints and C-reactive protein ≤ 1 at treatment start were considered pauci-inflammatory. Proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 30%, ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% pain improvement at 24 weeks was 61.4%, 49.3% and 32.9%. Furthermore, 40.6% and 28.5% of the patients achieved thresholds of remaining pain equivalent to mild pain or no/limited pain. Pain improvements were more evident in patients naive to previous biologics, although nearly 30% of multiple failures achieved VAS ≤ 20 mm. No significant differences were observed in relation to monotherapy. Pauci-inflammatory patients at treatment start achieved good outcomes, with 40.4% experiencing ≥ 70% pain improvement, and 35.7% VAS ≤ 10 mm. JAKis show efficacy in pain relief in real life. The improvement of painful symptoms also in those patients with limited objective inflammation may open new perspectives on the management of difficult-to-treat RA

Insights Into the Concept of Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare

Identification of a pathological change in the course of systemic chronic immune-inflammatory diseases is key to delivering effective treatment strategies. In this context, one of the most compelling issues is the concept of flare. The multifaceted expression of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) makes it challenging to provide an omni-comprehensive definition of flare, encompassing the pathology's different objective and subjective domains. Our incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this process contributes to the partial comprehension of its potential clinical expression. This review focuses on the proposed pathophysiological processes underlying disease recrudescence in RA and the variable definitions adopted to capture flare in clinical practice through its objective, subjective, and temporal domains. Overall, what emerges is a complex landscape far from being unraveled