35 research outputs found
A Case Report of Intraoperatively Diagnosed Cholangiocarcinoma after Unsuccessful Conservative Treatment of ERCP Complicated with Hemorrhage
[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]
Background
Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant tumor arising from the epithelium of the bile ducts. Most of these tumors are adenocarcinomas [1]. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma accounts for 10% of all cholangiocarcinomas, hilar cholangiocarcinoma for 25%, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for 65% [2, 3]. Cholangiocarcinoma can develop in any part of the extrahepatic duct, occurring in 50β75% of reported cases in the upper third of the duct including the hepatic hilum, in 10β25% in the middle third, and in 10β20% in the lower third [4β6]. Approximately 95% of cases show extrahepatic obstruction at the time of diagnosis [7]. In a meta-analysis of 21 prospective trials, the rate of hemorrhage as a complication of ERCP was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.2%β1.5%) with 70% of the bleeding episodes classiο¬ed as mild [8]. Hemorrhagic complications may be immediate or delayed, with recognition of occurring up to 2 weeks after the procedure. The risk of severe hemorrhage (ie, requiring >5 units of blood, surgery or angiography) is estimated to occur in fewer than1 per 1 000 sphincterotomies [9]. Despite new and advanced diagnostic methods, sometimes this type of tumor is finally diagnosed from pathological findings on excised tissue.
Case report
We present one case with cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed after surgical treatment of hemorrhage as post procedural complication from ERCP. With MRCP intraluminal stenosis of the upper part of common bile duct has been noticed and suspicious presence of substrate with consecutive dilatation of the upper billiary tract. ERCP was performed and sphincterotomy have been made without evacuation of any intraluminal substrate from common bile duct. Insufficient ERCP cholangiography was made and biopsy of the part with stenosis could not be taken due to permanent bleeding from performed sphincterotomy.
Despite all attempts for conservative treatment of the hemorrhage, patient was still with permanent decreases of hemoglobin levels and with persistent hemorrhagic anemia. With decision from medical council the patient has been transferred to the Department of abdominal surgery for further immediate surgical treatment.
Conclusion
Patient with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma initially diagnosed as a calculus in the common bile duct. Looking back, the patient had symptoms which differential diagnosis for bile duct cholangiocarcinoma should be established. Clinical symptoms such as right hypochondrium pain, itchy skin, vomiting and diarrhea. The laboratory findings showed constantly elevated bilirubin and liver enzymes also elevated tumor markers as CA19-9 and CEA. Hemorrhage that occurs after ERCP sphincterotomy and attempt for biopsy could not been controlled with conservative measures. Patient with consequently caused hemorrhagic anemia has been transferred for surgical treatment, which stopped the bleeding, made final diagnosis and treatment of proximal stenosis of common bile duct
Low - dose CT of the chest as a screening method for early detection of pulmonary cancer
Dose limitation is one of the vital principles in
radiation protection regulation. The use of that Low-dose chest CT can be a screening
method of choice for early detection of pulmonary cancer
Asessment of coronary arteries with ECG GATED 64-multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with suspected aortic dissection Stanford type A
The purpose of our study is to show the value of ECG gated 64-MDCT as an non - invasive and reliable method for simultaneous assessment of coronary arteries as part of the aortic root evaluation. Methods and Materials. From February 2009 until March 2010 we performed 46 ECG - gated, 64 MDCT examinations to confirm a diagnosis of suspected aorta ascendens dissection . A transthoracic (TTE) and/or transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography was initially performed in all patients ( mostly TEE) Patients (pts) with arrhythmia and non-stable haemodynamic conditions were excluded. All MDCT scans were performed with retrospectively ECG gated technique (0,625mm slice thickness). Premedicaton with i.v. betaBlocker (propranolol) was administrated in all with heart rate> 70 bpm
Π’ΠΈΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΆΠ»Π΅Π·Π΄Π°, Π°Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°
ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π°Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ²Π° ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΌΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½ΡΠ²Π° Π½ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ°ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°
-Π’ΠΈΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΆΠ»Π΅Π·Π΄Π° Π΅ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡ Π²Π΅Π΄Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΠΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠ°Π²ΠΎΡΠΎ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎ, Π²ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°Ρ
Π΅Π°. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ±ΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π΅ΠΊΡoΠΏΠΈΡΠ½Π° ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°
-Π‘ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π½Π° Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄ Π΄Π²Π° Π»ΠΎΠ±ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π΅Π½ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ β ΠΈΡΡΠΌΡΡ.ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°Π²Π°Ρ Π²ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΆΠ»Π΅Π·Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΎΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
ΠΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠΊΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈ ΡΠΎ Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°
Π¨ΡΠΎ Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ²Π°- MΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠΊΡΠ»ΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈ, Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈ, ΠΌΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π·Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ°
Π€Π»Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°
Π€Π»Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° βΠΊΠΎΠ½Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½Π° ΠΈ 64 ΠΠ‘ΠΠ’, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ²Π°Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρa ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π΄Π°Π²Π°Π°Ρ ΡΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Π²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
64 ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ°
-Π’Π΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ ΡΠΎ 64 ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Ρ.
-ΠΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ ΡΠΎ 64 ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Ρ.
-64 ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Ρ Π΄Π°Π²Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π· Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΊΡΠ²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ².........
64-Π‘Π»ΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Ρija- Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡ
64 Π‘Π»ΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Ρija;64 ΠΠ’ Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°; Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ; ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ; Π¦Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ°Π»Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°; ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π° Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΈ
Pre-operative 64-row-detector angiography for carotid artery stenosis in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery
the emphasize the need of performing pre-operative row-detector angiography of carotid artery stenosis discovered on preoperative clinical and Doppler evaluation in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° 64-ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ
64 ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°:
-Π’Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ° -0,625 ΠΌΠΌ, -Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ
-ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π±ΡΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅, ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡ
-ΠΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π° Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π²ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ (ΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½Π°, ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ·Π°Π»Π½Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½Π°)
-KΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½Π° 3Π Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°
-ΠΠΠ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅
-Π‘ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ 3Π ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ
-ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»Π½Π° Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ